Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Catani's generalization of collinear factorization breaking

Published 22 Feb 2024 in hep-ph, hep-ex, and hep-th | (2402.14749v1)

Abstract: We consider the most general form of soft and collinear factorization for hard-scattering amplitudes to all orders in perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics. Specifically, we present the generalization of collinear factorization to configurations with several collinear directions, where the most singular behaviour is encoded by generalized collinear splitting amplitudes that manifestly embed the breaking of strict collinear factorization in space-like collinear configurations. We also extend the analysis to the simultaneous soft-collinear factorization with multiple collinear directions and show how na\"{\i}ve multiplicative factorization do not hold.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B 126, 298 (1977).
  2. S. Catani and M. H. Seymour, Nucl. Phys. B 485, 291 (1997), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 510, 503–504 (1998)], arXiv:hep-ph/9605323 .
  3. S. Frixione, Nucl. Phys. B 507, 295 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9706545 .
  4. G. Heinrich, Phys. Rept. 922, 1 (2021), arXiv:2009.00516 [hep-ph] .
  5. W. J. Torres Bobadilla et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 250 (2021), arXiv:2012.02567 [hep-ph] .
  6. T. Neumann and J. Campbell, Phys. Rev. D 107, L011506 (2023), arXiv:2207.07056 [hep-ph] .
  7. F. A. Berends and W. T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B 313, 595 (1989).
  8. J. M. Campbell and E. W. N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B 527, 264 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9710255 .
  9. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Nucl. Phys. B 570, 287 (2000a), arXiv:hep-ph/9908523 .
  10. Z. Bern and G. Chalmers, Nucl. Phys. B 447, 465 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9503236 .
  11. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Nucl. Phys. B 591, 435 (2000b), arXiv:hep-ph/0007142 .
  12. Y. J. Zhu,   (2020), arXiv:2009.08919 [hep-ph] .
  13. S. Catani and L. Cieri, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 97 (2022), arXiv:2108.13309 [hep-ph] .
  14. Y. Li and H. X. Zhu, JHEP 11, 080 (2013), arXiv:1309.4391 [hep-ph] .
  15. C. Duhr and T. Gehrmann, Phys. Lett. B 727, 452 (2013), arXiv:1309.4393 [hep-ph] .
  16. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Phys. Lett. B 446, 143 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810389 .
  17. D. A. Kosower and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B 563, 477 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9903515 .
  18. M. Czakon and S. Sapeta, JHEP 07, 052 (2022), arXiv:2204.11801 [hep-ph] .
  19. S. D. Badger and E. W. N. Glover, JHEP 07, 040 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405236 .
  20. T. C. Rogers and P. J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. D 81, 094006 (2010), arXiv:1001.2977 [hep-ph] .
  21. T. C. Rogers, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014002 (2013), arXiv:1304.4251 [hep-ph] .
  22. J. Keates and M. H. Seymour, JHEP 04, 040 (2009), arXiv:0902.0477 [hep-ph] .
  23. I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105020 (2014), arXiv:1403.6472 [hep-ph] .
  24. G. Sterman, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2207.06507 [hep-ph] .
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.