Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Efficient Solvers for Wyner Common Information with Application to Multi-Modal Clustering

Published 22 Feb 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2402.14266v1)

Abstract: We propose two novel extensions of the Wyner common information optimization problem. Each relaxes one fundamental constraints in Wyner's formulation. The \textit{Variational Wyner Common Information} relaxes the matching constraint to the known distribution while imposing conditional independence to the feasible solution set. We derive a tight surrogate upper bound of the obtained unconstrained Lagrangian via the theory of variational inference, which can be minimized efficiently. Our solver caters to problems where conditional independence holds with significantly reduced computation complexity; On the other hand, the \textit{Bipartite Wyner Common Information} relaxes the conditional independence constraint whereas the matching condition is enforced on the feasible set. By leveraging the difference-of-convex structure of the formulated optimization problem, we show that our solver is resilient to conditional dependent sources. Both solvers are provably convergent (local stationary points), and empirically, they obtain more accurate solutions to Wyner's formulation with substantially less runtime. Moreover, them can be extended to unknown distribution settings by parameterizing the common randomness as a member of the exponential family of distributions. Our approaches apply to multi-modal clustering problems, where multiple modalities of observations come from the same cluster. Empirically, our solvers outperform the state-of-the-art multi-modal clustering algorithms with significantly improved performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. A. Wyner, “The common information of two dependent random variables,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 163–179, 1975.
  2. G. Xu, W. Liu, and B. Chen, “A lossy source coding interpretation of Wyner’s common information,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 754–768, 2016.
  3. G. R. Kumar, C. T. Li, and A. El Gamal, “Exact common information,” in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.   IEEE, 2014, pp. 161–165.
  4. L. Yu, “Gray–Wyner and mutual information regions for doubly symmetric binary sources and Gaussian sources,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 6251–6268, 2023.
  5. O. A. Hanna, X. Li, S. Diggavi, and C. Fragouli, “Common information dimension,” in 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 2023, pp. 406–411.
  6. S.-L. Huang, X. Xu, L. Zheng, and G. W. Wornell, “A local characterization for Wyner common information,” in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 2020, pp. 2252–2257.
  7. B. N. Vellambi and J. Kliewer, “New results on the equality of exact and Wyner common information rates,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 2018, pp. 151–155.
  8. L. Yu and V. Y. F. Tan, “On exact and ∞\infty∞-Rényi common informations,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 3366–3406, 2020.
  9. E. Sula and M. Gastpar, “The Gray-Wyner network and Wyner’s common information for Gaussian sources,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1369–1384, 2021.
  10. E. Sula and M. C. Gastpar, “Common information components analysis,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 151, 2021.
  11. T.-H. Huang and H. El Gamal, “Efficient alternating minimization solvers for Wyner multi-view unsupervised learning,” in 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 2023, pp. 707–712.
  12. Y. Uğur, I. E. Aguerri, and A. Zaidi, “Vector Gaussian CEO problem under logarithmic loss and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 4183–4202, 2020.
  13. W. Guo, J. Wang, and S. Wang, “Deep multimodal representation learning: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 63 373–63 394, 2019.
  14. J. Gao, P. Li, Z. Chen, and J. Zhang, “A survey on deep learning for multimodal data fusion,” Neural Computation, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 829–864, 2020.
  15. J. Ngiam, A. Khosla, M. Kim, J. Nam, H. Lee, and A. Y. Ng, “Multimodal deep learning,” in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11), 2011, pp. 689–696.
  16. Y. Li, M. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “A survey of multi-view representation learning,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1863–1883, 2019.
  17. S. Sun, “A survey of multi-view machine learning,” Neural computing and applications, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2031–2038, 2013.
  18. Y. Yang and H. Wang, “Multi-view clustering: A survey,” Big Data Mining and Analytics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–107, 2018.
  19. R. Bekkerman and J. Jeon, “Multi-modal clustering for multimedia collections,” in 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007, pp. 1–8.
  20. X. Cai, F. Nie, H. Huang, and F. Kamangar, “Heterogeneous image feature integration via multi-modal spectral clustering,” in CVPR 2011, 2011, pp. 1977–1984.
  21. T. M. Sutter, I. Daunhawer, and J. E. Vogt, “Generalized multimodal ELBO,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02470, 2021.
  22. Y. Shi, B. Paige, P. Torr et al., “Variational mixture-of-experts autoencoders for multi-modal deep generative models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  23. J. Xu, H. Tang, Y. Ren, L. Peng, X. Zhu, and L. He, “Multi-level feature learning for contrastive multi-view clustering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 16 051–16 060.
  24. E. Palumbo, I. Daunhawer, and J. E. Vogt, “MMVAE+: Enhancing the generative quality of multimodal VAEs without compromises,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.   s.l.: OpenReview, 2023, Conference Paper, 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2023); Conference Location: Kigali, Rwanda; Conference Date: May 1-5, 2023.
  25. H. Hwang, G.-H. Kim, S. Hong, and K.-E. Kim, “Multi-view representation learning via total correlation objective,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 12 194–12 207, 2021.
  26. M. Wu and N. Goodman, “Multimodal generative models for scalable weakly-supervised learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  27. M. A. Lee, Y. Zhu, P. Zachares, M. Tan, K. Srinivasan, S. Savarese, L. Fei-Fei, A. Garg, and J. Bohg, “Making sense of vision and touch: Learning multimodal representations for contact-rich tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 582–596, 2020.
  28. H. A. Le Thi and T. Pham Dinh, “DC programming and DCA: thirty years of developments,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 5–68, 2018.
  29. T.-H. Huang, A. E. Gamal, and H. E. Gamal, “A linearly convergent Douglas-Rachford splitting solver for Markovian information-theoretic optimization problems,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3372–3399, 2023.
  30. P. Fränti and S. Sieranoja, “How much can k-means be improved by using better initialization and repeats?” Pattern Recognition, vol. 93, pp. 95–112, 2019.
  31. D. F. Crouse, “On implementing 2D rectangular assignment algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1679–1696, 2016.
  32. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational Bayes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  33. J. Xu, Y. Ren, H. Tang, X. Pu, X. Zhu, M. Zeng, and L. He, “Multi-VAE: Learning disentangled view-common and view-peculiar visual representations for multi-view clustering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 9234–9243.
  34. P. Indyk and R. Motwani, “Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality,” in Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 1998, pp. 604–613.
  35. Y. Tian, D. Krishnan, and P. Isola, “Contrastive multiview coding,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XI 16.   Springer, 2020, pp. 776–794.
  36. P. Viola and W. M. Wells III, “Alignment by maximization of mutual information,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 137–154, 1997.
  37. F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, “Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information,” IEEE transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187–198, 1997.
  38. R. D. Hjelm, A. Fedorov, S. Lavoie-Marchildon, K. Grewal, P. Bachman, A. Trischler, and Y. Bengio, “Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06670, 2018.
  39. B. Poole, S. Ozair, A. Van Den Oord, A. Alemi, and G. Tucker, “On variational bounds of mutual information,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2019, pp. 5171–5180.
  40. S. Chiu, “A cluster estimation method with extension to fuzzy model identification,” in Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference, 1994, pp. 1240–1245 vol.2.
  41. Z. He, A. Cichocki, S. Xie, and K. Choi, “Detecting the number of clusters in n-way probabilistic clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2006–2021, 2010.
  42. M. Syakur, B. Khotimah, E. Rochman, and B. D. Satoto, “Integration K-Means clustering method and elbow method for identification of the best customer profile cluster,” in IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol. 336.   IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 012017.
  43. E. Becht, L. McInnes, J. Healy, C.-A. Dutertre, I. W. Kwok, L. G. Ng, F. Ginhoux, and E. W. Newell, “Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using umap,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2019.
  44. A. v. d. Oord, Y. Li, and O. Vinyals, “Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018.
  45. X. Peng, Z. Huang, J. Lv, H. Zhu, and J. T. Zhou, “COMIC: Multi-view clustering without parameter selection,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, Eds., vol. 97.   PMLR, 09–15 Jun 2019, pp. 5092–5101. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/peng19a.html
  46. L. Deng, “The MNIST database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research [best of the web],” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 141–142, 2012.
  47. J. Hull, “A database for handwritten text recognition research,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 550–554, 1994.
  48. H. Xiao, K. Rasul, and R. Vollgraf, “Fashion-MNIST: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747, 2017.
  49. X. Cai, H. Wang, H. Huang, and C. Ding, “Joint stage recognition and anatomical annotation of drosophila gene expression patterns,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. i16–i24, 2012.
  50. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona, “Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories,” in 2004 conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshop.   IEEE, 2004, pp. 178–178.
  51. Y. Li, F. Nie, H. Huang, and J. Huang, “Large-scale multi-view spectral clustering via bipartite graph,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.
  52. J. Wu and J. M. Rehg, “CENTRIST: A visual descriptor for scene categorization,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1489–1501, 2011.
  53. T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa, “Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 971–987, 2002.
  54. A. Oliva and A. Torralba, “Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 42, pp. 145–175, 2001.
  55. N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection,” in 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), vol. 1, 2005, pp. 886–893 vol. 1.
  56. Y.-G. Jiang, G. Ye, S.-F. Chang, D. Ellis, and A. C. Loui, “Consumer video understanding: A benchmark database and an evaluation of human and machine performance,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 2011, pp. 1–8.
  57. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 60, pp. 91–110, 2004.
  58. Laptev and Lindeberg, “Space-time interest points,” in Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2003, pp. 432–439 vol.1.
  59. G. Ke, Z. Hong, Z. Zeng, Z. Liu, Y. Sun, and Y. Xie, “CONAN: Contrastive fusion networks for multi-view clustering,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2021, pp. 653–660.
  60. Y. Asano, M. Patrick, C. Rupprecht, and A. Vedaldi, “Labelling unlabelled videos from scratch with multi-modal self-supervision,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 4660–4671, 2020.
  61. H. Alwassel, D. Mahajan, B. Korbar, L. Torresani, B. Ghanem, and D. Tran, “Self-supervised learning by cross-modal audio-video clustering,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 9758–9770, 2020.
  62. A. Kumar, P. Rai, and H. Daume, “Co-regularized multi-view spectral clustering,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 24, 2011.
  63. X. Zhu, S. Zhang, W. He, R. Hu, C. Lei, and P. Zhu, “One-step multi-view spectral clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2022–2034, 2019.
  64. Y. Wang, L. Wu, X. Lin, and J. Gao, “Multiview spectral clustering via structured low-rank matrix factorization,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 4833–4843, 2018.
  65. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “ADAM: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.