On the Arrow of Inference
Abstract: Just as the arrow of time structures physics, the arrow of inference organizes cognition, directing the flow of information in perception, action, and memory. The Context-Content Uncertainty Principle (CCUP) formalizes this asymmetry, between high-entropy context and low-entropy content, and frames inference as a cycle that aligns the two through selective, bidirectional interaction. Cycle formation resolves the Information Bottleneck (IB) in Optimal Transport (OT) by coordinating bottom-up contextual disambiguation with top-down content reconstruction, a process neurobiologically mirrored in the cyclical interplay between dorsal (context) and ventral (content) streams. Local inference cycles extend into memory chains that simulate goals, support counterfactual reasoning, and scaffold internal model refinement across time. By operating on delta-seeded goal manifolds, each level of the hierarchy circumvents the curse of dimensionality through structured diffusion guided by priors and context. This mechanism generalizes across timescales, from perception-action loops to the sleep-wake cycle-and scales socially through language, which externalizes inference by transmitting latent content across minds. Thus, CCUP provides a unifying framework for understanding cognition as cycle-consistent inference, anchoring both individual thought and collective intelligence.
- D. Hebb, “The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory.” 1949.
- H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, “Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons,” Biophysical journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1972.
- G.-q. Bi and M.-m. Poo, “Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type,” Journal of neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 10 464–10 472, 1998.
- N. Caporale and Y. Dan, “Spike timing–dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 31, pp. 25–46, 2008.
- E. M. Izhikevich, “Polychronization: computation with spikes,” Neural computation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 245–282, 2006.
- V. B. Mountcastle, “Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat’s somatic sensory cortex,” Journal of neurophysiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 408–434, 1957.
- A. M. Bastos, W. M. Usrey, R. A. Adams, G. R. Mangun, P. Fries, and K. J. Friston, “Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding,” Neuron, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 695–711, 2012.
- “On the computational architecture of the neocortex: Ii the role of cortico-cortical loops,” Biological cybernetics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 1992.
- J. C. Horton and D. L. Adams, “The cortical column: a structure without a function,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 360, no. 1456, pp. 837–862, 2005.
- D. Marr, “A theory of cerebellar cortex,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 437–470, 1969.
- ——, “A theory for cerebral neocortex,” Proceedings of the Royal society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, vol. 176, no. 1043, pp. 161–234, 1970.
- ——, “Simple memory: A theory for archicortex,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, pp. 23–81, 1971.
- A. R. Damasio, “Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition,” Cognition, vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 25–62, 1989.
- R. P. Rao and D. H. Ballard, “Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 1999.
- K. Friston, “The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?” Nature reviews neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127–138, 2010.
- A. Zador, S. Escola, B. Richards, B. Ölveczky, Y. Bengio, K. Boahen, M. Botvinick, D. Chklovskii, A. Churchland, C. Clopath et al., “Catalyzing next-generation artificial intelligence through neuroai,” Nature communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1597, 2023.
- J. Pei, L. Deng, S. Song, M. Zhao, Y. Zhang, S. Wu, G. Wang, Z. Zou, Z. Wu, W. He et al., “Towards artificial general intelligence with hybrid tianjic chip architecture,” Nature, vol. 572, no. 7767, pp. 106–111, 2019.
- P. Cisek and B. Y. Hayden, “Neuroscience needs evolution,” p. 20200518, 2022.
- W. R. Ashby, “An introduction to cybernetics,” 1956.
- J. K. O’regan, “Solving the” real” mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory.” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 461, 1992.
- R. A. Brooks, “Intelligence without representation,” Artificial intelligence, vol. 47, no. 1-3, pp. 139–159, 1991.
- J. W. Krakauer, A. A. Ghazanfar, A. Gomez-Marin, M. A. MacIver, and D. Poeppel, “Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias,” Neuron, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 480–490, 2017.
- P. W. Anderson, “More is different: Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science.” Science, vol. 177, no. 4047, pp. 393–396, 1972.
- J. J. Hopfield, “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.” Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2554–2558, 1982.
- M. G. Dissanayake, P. Newman, S. Clark, H. F. Durrant-Whyte, and M. Csorba, “A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (slam) problem,” IEEE Transactions on robotics and automation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 2001.
- G. B. Keller and T. D. Mrsic-Flogel, “Predictive processing: a canonical cortical computation,” Neuron, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 424–435, 2018.
- J. C. Whittington, D. McCaffary, J. J. Bakermans, and T. E. Behrens, “How to build a cognitive map,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1257–1272, 2022.
- J. C. Whittington, T. H. Muller, S. Mark, G. Chen, C. Barry, N. Burgess, and T. E. Behrens, “The tolman-eichenbaum machine: unifying space and relational memory through generalization in the hippocampal formation,” Cell, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 1249–1263, 2020.
- R. V. Raju, J. S. Guntupalli, G. Zhou, M. Lázaro-Gredilla, and D. George, “Space is a latent sequence: Structured sequence learning as a unified theory of representation in the hippocampus,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01508, 2022.
- R. A. Andersen, L. H. Snyder, C.-S. Li, and B. Stricanne, “Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information,” Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 1993.
- A. Pouget and T. J. Sejnowski, “Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions,” Journal of cognitive neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 222–237, 1997.
- M. Graf, “Coordinate transformations in object recognition.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 132, no. 6, p. 920, 2006.
- A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, “A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,” The Journal of physiology, vol. 117, no. 4, p. 500, 1952.
- P. S. Churchland, V. S. Ramachandran, and T. J. Sejnowski, “A critique of pure vision,” 1993.
- C. F. Hockett and C. D. Hockett, “The origin of speech,” Scientific American, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 88–97, 1960.
- A. Chemero, “Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 625–647, 2000.
- P. Haselager, A. De Groot, and H. Van Rappard, “Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: a debate for the sake of appearance,” Philosophical psychology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2003.
- D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, R. J. Williams et al., “Learning internal representations by error propagation,” 1985.
- J. J. Gibson, “The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition,” 1979.
- Z. Durante, Q. Huang, N. Wake, R. Gong, J. S. Park, B. Sarkar, R. Taori, Y. Noda, D. Terzopoulos, Y. Choi et al., “Agent ai: Surveying the horizons of multimodal interaction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03568, 2024.
- D. A. Leopold and N. K. Logothetis, “Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception,” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 254–264, 1999.
- A. S. Pillai and V. K. Jirsa, “Symmetry breaking in space-time hierarchies shapes brain dynamics and behavior,” Neuron, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1010–1026, 2017.
- E. P. Frady and F. T. Sommer, “Robust computation with rhythmic spike patterns,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 36, pp. 18 050–18 059, 2019.
- J. J. DiCarlo, D. Zoccolan, and N. C. Rust, “How does the brain solve visual object recognition?” Neuron, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 415–434, 2012.
- Y. LeCun, S. Chopra, R. Hadsell, M. Ranzato, and F. Huang, “A tutorial on energy-based learning,” Predicting structured data, vol. 1, no. 0, 2006.
- E. T. Jaynes, “Information theory and statistical mechanics,” Physical review, vol. 106, no. 4, p. 620, 1957.
- E. N. Lorenz, “Deterministic nonperiodic flow,” Journal of atmospheric sciences, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 130–141, 1963.
- J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P. Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler, “The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 77, no. 1, p. 137, 2005.
- E. A. Martens, E. Barreto, S. H. Strogatz, E. Ott, P. So, and T. M. Antonsen, “Exact results for the kuramoto model with a bimodal frequency distribution,” Physical Review E, vol. 79, no. 2, p. 026204, 2009.
- P. Sterzer, A. Kleinschmidt, and G. Rees, “The neural bases of multistable perception,” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 310–318, 2009.
- R. Perin, T. K. Berger, and H. Markram, “A synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 13, pp. 5419–5424, 2011.
- G. Buzsaki and A. Draguhn, “Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks,” science, vol. 304, no. 5679, pp. 1926–1929, 2004.
- G. Buzsáki, “Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers,” Neuron, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 362–385, 2010.
- M. Dabagia, C. H. Papadimitriou, and S. S. Vempala, “Computation with sequences in the brain,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03812, 2023.
- H. C. Barron, R. Auksztulewicz, and K. Friston, “Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account,” Progress in neurobiology, vol. 192, p. 101821, 2020.
- T. e. a. Salvatori, “Associative memories via predictive coding,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 3874–3886, 2021.
- K. Friston, “A theory of cortical responses,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences, vol. 360, no. 1456, pp. 815–836, 2005.
- B. Millidge, A. Seth, and C. L. Buckley, “Predictive coding: a theoretical and experimental review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12979, 2021.
- R. J. Douglas and K. Martin, “A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex.” The Journal of physiology, vol. 440, no. 1, pp. 735–769, 1991.
- S. Haeusler and W. Maass, “A statistical analysis of information-processing properties of lamina-specific cortical microcircuit models,” Cerebral cortex, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 149–162, 2007.
- M. Larkum, “A cellular mechanism for cortical associations: an organizing principle for the cerebral cortex,” Trends in neurosciences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 141–151, 2013.
- R. Smith, M. Self, and P. Cheeseman, “Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics,” in Autonomous robot vehicles. Springer, 1990, pp. 167–193.
- V. Fragoso, J. DeGol, and G. Hua, “gdls*: Generalized pose-and-scale estimation given scale and gravity priors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 2210–2219.
- L. F. Jacobs and F. Schenk, “Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function.” Psychological review, vol. 110, no. 2, p. 285, 2003.
- S. L. Bowman, N. Atanasov, K. Daniilidis, and G. J. Pappas, “Probabilistic data association for semantic slam,” in International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1722–1729.
- M. Stemmler, A. Mathis, and A. V. Herz, “Connecting multiple spatial scales to decode the population activity of grid cells,” Science Advances, vol. 1, no. 11, p. e1500816, 2015.
- C. L. Krumhansl and E. J. Kessler, “Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys.” Psychological review, vol. 89, no. 4, p. 334, 1982.
- G. Carlsson, T. Ishkhanov, V. De Silva, and A. Zomorodian, “On the local behavior of spaces of natural images,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 76, pp. 1–12, 2008.
- E. I. Moser, E. Kropff, and M.-B. Moser, “Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 31, pp. 69–89, 2008.
- A. TURING, “The chemical basis of mokphogenesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 237, no. 641, pp. 37–72, 1952.
- M. C. Fuhs and D. S. Touretzky, “A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 4266–4276, 2006.
- D. George, R. V. Rikhye, N. Gothoskar, J. S. Guntupalli, A. Dedieu, and M. Lázaro-Gredilla, “Clone-structured graph representations enable flexible learning and vicarious evaluation of cognitive maps,” Nature communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2392, 2021.
- J. C. Whittington, J. Warren, and T. E. Behrens, “Relating transformers to models and neural representations of the hippocampal formation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04035, 2021.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
- W. J. Johnston and S. Fusi, “Abstract representations emerge naturally in neural networks trained to perform multiple tasks,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1040, 2023.
- R. Davis, H. Shrobe, and P. Szolovits, “What is a knowledge representation?” AI magazine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 17–17, 1993.
- J. Yu, A. I. Cristea, A. Harit, Z. Sun, O. T. Aduragba, L. Shi, and N. Al Moubayed, “Language as a latent sequence: Deep latent variable models for semi-supervised paraphrase generation,” AI Open, vol. 4, pp. 19–32, 2023.
- R. Bottini and C. F. Doeller, “Knowledge across reference frames: Cognitive maps and image spaces,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 606–619, 2020.
- A. D. Redish and D. S. Touretzky, “Cognitive maps beyond the hippocampus,” Hippocampus, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15–35, 1997.
- T. B. Crapse and M. A. Sommer, “Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 587–600, 2008.
- I. Cone and C. Clopath, “Latent representations in hippocampal network model co-evolve with behavioral exploration of task structure,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 687, 2024.
- H. Sohn, N. Meirhaeghe, R. Rajalingham, and M. Jazayeri, “A network perspective on sensorimotor learning,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 170–181, 2021.
- S. Chung and L. Abbott, “Neural population geometry: An approach for understanding biological and artificial neural networks,” Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 70, pp. 137–144, 2021.
- M. JORDAN and D. RUMELHART, “Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher,” COGNITIVE SCIENCE, vol. 16, p. 307354, 1992.
- X. Liu, F. Zhang, Z. Hou, L. Mian, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Self-supervised learning: Generative or contrastive,” IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 857–876, 2021.
- M. Farrell, S. Recanatesi, and E. Shea-Brown, “From lazy to rich to exclusive task representations in neural networks and neural codes,” Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 83, p. 102780, 2023.
- I. Rish et al., “An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier,” in IJCAI 2001 workshop on empirical methods in artificial intelligence, vol. 3, no. 22, 2001, pp. 41–46.
- A. Clark, “An embodied cognitive science?” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 345–351, 1999.
- A. A. Russo, S. R. Bittner, S. M. Perkins, J. S. Seely, B. M. London, A. H. Lara, A. Miri, N. J. Marshall, A. Kohn, T. M. Jessell et al., “Motor cortex embeds muscle-like commands in an untangled population response,” Neuron, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 953–966, 2018.
- S. Vyas, M. D. Golub, D. Sussillo, and K. V. Shenoy, “Computation through neural population dynamics,” Annual review of neuroscience, vol. 43, pp. 249–275, 2020.
- T. Ito and J. D. Murray, “Multitask representations in the human cortex transform along a sensory-to-motor hierarchy,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 306–315, 2023.
- J. C. Whittington, W. Dorrell, S. Ganguli, and T. Behrens, “Disentanglement with biological constraints: A theory of functional cell types,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
- T. Ito, T. Klinger, D. Schultz, J. Murray, M. Cole, and M. Rigotti, “Compositional generalization through abstract representations in human and artificial neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 32 225–32 239, 2022.
- M. Wilson, “Six views of embodied cognition,” Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 9, pp. 625–636, 2002.
- D. V. Buonomano and M. M. Merzenich, “Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps,” Annual review of neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 149–186, 1998.
- Y. Ma, D. Tsao, and H.-Y. Shum, “On the principles of parsimony and self-consistency for the emergence of intelligence,” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1298–1323, 2022.
- H. A. Simon, “The architecture of complexity,” Proceedings of the American philosophical society, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 467–482, 1962.
- A. Treisman, “The binding problem,” Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 1996.
- B. L. McNaughton, F. P. Battaglia, O. Jensen, E. I. Moser, and M.-B. Moser, “Path integration and the neural basis of the’cognitive map’,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 663–678, 2006.
- A. S. Etienne and K. J. Jeffery, “Path integration in mammals,” Hippocampus, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 180–192, 2004.
- A. Samsonovich and B. L. McNaughton, “Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 5900–5920, 1997.
- H. Ramsauer, B. Schäfl, J. Lehner, P. Seidl, M. Widrich, T. Adler, L. Gruber, M. Holzleitner, M. Pavlović, G. K. Sandve et al., “Hopfield networks is all you need,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02217, 2020.
- M. T. Ullman, “A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model,” Nature reviews neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 717–726, 2001.
- ——, “Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model,” Cognition, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 231–270, 2004.
- E. C. Tolman, “Cognitive maps in rats and men.” Psychological review, vol. 55, no. 4, p. 189, 1948.
- T. E. Behrens, T. H. Muller, J. C. Whittington, S. Mark, A. B. Baram, K. L. Stachenfeld, and Z. Kurth-Nelson, “What is a cognitive map? organizing knowledge for flexible behavior,” Neuron, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 490–509, 2018.
- A. Dedieu, N. Gothoskar, S. Swingle, W. Lehrach, M. Lázaro-Gredilla, and D. George, “Learning higher-order sequential structure with cloned hmms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00507, 2019.
- R. L. Klatzky, “Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections,” in Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge. Springer, 1998, pp. 1–17.
- R. M. Murray, Z. Li, and S. Shankar Sastry, “A mathmematical introduction to robotic manipulation,” 1994.
- C. F. Moss and S. R. Sinha, “Neurobiology of echolocation in bats,” Current opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 751–758, 2003.
- S. Toledo, D. Shohami, I. Schiffner, E. Lourie, Y. Orchan, Y. Bartan, and R. Nathan, “Cognitive map–based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system,” Science, vol. 369, no. 6500, pp. 188–193, 2020.
- L. Harten, A. Katz, A. Goldshtein, M. Handel, and Y. Yovel, “The ontogeny of a mammalian cognitive map in the real world,” Science, vol. 369, no. 6500, pp. 194–197, 2020.
- J. O’keefe and L. Nadel, “Précis of o’keefe & nadel’s the hippocampus as a cognitive map,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 487–494, 1979.
- J. Steckel and H. Peremans, “Batslam: Simultaneous localization and mapping using biomimetic sonar,” PloS one, vol. 8, no. 1, p. e54076, 2013.
- L. Pessoa, E. Thompson, and A. Noë, “Finding out about filling-in: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception,” Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 723–748, 1998.
- D. H. Ballard, “Generalizing the hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes,” Pattern recognition, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 1981.
- J. Hawkins, M. Lewis, M. Klukas, S. Purdy, and S. Ahmad, “A framework for intelligence and cortical function based on grid cells in the neocortex,” Frontiers in neural circuits, vol. 12, p. 121, 2019.
- T. DeWolf and C. Eliasmith, “The neural optimal control hierarchy for motor control,” Journal of neural engineering, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 065009, 2011.
- R. Bellman, “Dynamic programming,” Science, vol. 153, no. 3731, pp. 34–37, 1966.
- T. Poggio and E. Bizzi, “Generalization in vision and motor control,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7010, pp. 768–774, 2004.
- L. G. Ungerleider and J. V. Haxby, “‘what’and ‘where’in the human brain,” Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 1994.
- B. Amirikian and A. P. Georgopoulos, “Modular organization of directionally tuned cells in the motor cortex: is there a short-range order?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 100, no. 21, pp. 12 474–12 479, 2003.
- G. E. Loeb, I. E. Brown, and E. J. Cheng, “A hierarchical foundation for models of sensorimotor control,” Experimental brain research, vol. 126, pp. 1–18, 1999.
- K. Fukushima, “A hierarchical neural network model for associative memory,” Biological cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 105–113, 1984.
- D. Krotov, “Hierarchical associative memory,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06446, 2021.
- J. J. DiCarlo and D. D. Cox, “Untangling invariant object recognition,” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 333–341, 2007.
- O. Sacks, “The man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales,” 1970.
- D. H. Ballard, “Animate vision,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 57–86, 1991.
- N. Tishby, F. C. Pereira, and W. Bialek, “The information bottleneck method,” arXiv preprint physics/0004057, 2000.
- J. Cui, Y. N. Wu, and T. Han, “Learning hierarchical features with joint latent space energy-based prior,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 2218–2227.
- S. Hedayati, R. E. O’Donnell, and B. Wyble, “A model of working memory for latent representations,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 709–719, 2022.
- B. e. a. Millidge, “Universal hopfield networks: A general framework for single-shot associative memory models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 15 561–15 583.
- V. Di Lollo, “The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem,” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 317–321, 2012.
- J. Theeuwes, “Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis,” Acta psychologica, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 93–154, 1993.
- G. R. Mangun, “Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention,” Psychophysiology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–18, 1995.
- L. Itti and C. Koch, “Computational modelling of visual attention,” Nature reviews neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 194–203, 2001.
- A. Thiele and M. A. Bellgrove, “Neuromodulation of attention,” Neuron, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 769–785, 2018.
- R. Khalitov, T. Yu, L. Cheng, and Z. Yang, “Sparse factorization of square matrices with application to neural attention modeling,” Neural Networks, vol. 152, pp. 160–168, 2022.
- J. M. Wolfe and T. S. Horowitz, “Five factors that guide attention in visual search,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 0058, 2017.
- S. Pinker and P. Bloom, “Natural language and natural selection,” Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 707–727, 1990.
- M. H. Fischer and R. A. Zwaan, “Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension,” Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 825–850, 2008.
- A. M. Glenberg and M. P. Kaschak, “Grounding language in action,” Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 558–565, 2002.
- D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan, “The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking,” Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, 2005.
- B. Hommel, J. Müsseler, G. Aschersleben, and W. Prinz, “The theory of event coding (tec): A framework for perception and action planning,” Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 849–878, 2001.
- Y. K. Shin, R. W. Proctor, and E. J. Capaldi, “A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.” Psychological bulletin, vol. 136, no. 6, p. 943, 2010.
- V. Gallese and A. Goldman, “Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading,” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 493–501, 1998.
- M. Jeannerod, “Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition,” Neuroimage, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. S103–S109, 2001.
- R. A. Zwaan and L. J. Taylor, “Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 135, no. 1, p. 1, 2006.
- J. Merel, M. Botvinick, and G. Wayne, “Hierarchical motor control in mammals and machines,” Nature communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5489, 2019.
- N. Chomsky, “Syntactic structures,” 1957.
- A. Pascual-Leone and F. Torres, “Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in braille readers,” Brain, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 1993.
- S. Schaal, “Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?” Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 233–242, 1999.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.