Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Synergy between DUNE and T2HKK to probe Invisible Neutrino Decay

Published 20 Feb 2024 in hep-ph | (2402.13235v2)

Abstract: We address the consequence of invisible neutrino decay within the framework of two long base-line neutrino experiments: T2HKK (Tokai-to-Hyper-Kamiokande-to-Korea) and DUNE (Deep Underground Neutrino experiment). Our primary objective is to bring out the aspects of CC (charged current) and NC (neutral current) measurements at DUNE in the context of invisible neutrino decay. We find that the inclusion of NC measurements with the CC measurements enhances its ability to constrain invisible neutrino decay. Further, the synergy between DUNE and T2HKK improves the constraints on invisible neutrino decay. At 3$\sigma$ C.L. (confidence level) the derived constraint is $\tau_{3}/m_{3}\geq6.21\times10{-11}$ s/eV. Additionally, if nature prefers $\nu_{3}$ to be unstable and the decay width is $\tau_{3}/m_{3}= 2.2\times10{-11}$ s/eV, this combination can exclude the no-decay scenario at more than 5$\sigma$ C.L. Although the CP sensitivity is not much hindered in the presence of invisible neutrino decay, the measurements of $\theta_{23}$ and the ability to resolve octant of $\theta_{23}$ is significantly influenced in these individual experiments. In the presence of invisible neutrino decay, the synergy between DUNE and T2HKK can exclude the wrong octant somewhat more effectively than either experiment alone.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. K. Abe et al. (T2K), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 151801 (2017), arXiv:1701.00432 [hep-ex] .
  2. P. Adamson et al. (NOvA), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 151806 (2016), arXiv:1601.05022 [hep-ex] .
  3. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE),   (2015), arXiv:1512.06148 [physics.ins-det] .
  4. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-), PTEP 2015, 053C02 (2015), arXiv:1502.05199 [hep-ex] .
  5. E. Baussan et al. (ESSnuSB), Nucl. Phys. B 885, 127 (2014), arXiv:1309.7022 [hep-ex] .
  6. F. An et al. (JUNO), J. Phys. G 43, 030401 (2016), arXiv:1507.05613 [physics.ins-det] .
  7. S. Ahmed et al. (ICAL), Pramana 88, 79 (2017), arXiv:1505.07380 [physics.ins-det] .
  8. A. Margiotta (KM3NeT), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 766, 83 (2014), arXiv:1408.1392 [astro-ph.IM] .
  9. A. Acker and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Lett. B 320, 320 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9310207 .
  10. J. M. LoSecco,   (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809499 .
  11. P. Lipari and M. Lusignoli, Phys. Rev. D 60, 013003 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901350 .
  12. Y. Ashie et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 101801 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0404034 .
  13. S. Choubey and S. Goswami, Astropart. Phys. 14, 67 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9904257 .
  14. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Phys. Lett. B 663, 405 (2008), arXiv:0802.3699 [hep-ph] .
  15. P. Coloma and O. L. G. Peres,   (2017), arXiv:1705.03599 [hep-ph] .
  16. P. B. Denton and I. Tamborra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 121802 (2018), arXiv:1805.05950 [hep-ph] .
  17. T. Alion et al. (DUNE),  (2016), arXiv:1606.09550 [physics.ins-det] .
  18. C. Adams et al. (LBNE), in Snowmass 2013: Workshop on Energy Frontier (2013) arXiv:1307.7335 [hep-ex] .
  19. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande), PTEP 2018, 063C01 (2018), arXiv:1611.06118 [hep-ex] .
  20. S. K. Raut, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, 1350093 (2013), arXiv:1209.5658 [hep-ph] .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.