Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Comment on a no-go theorem for $ψ$-ontic models

Published 20 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.13140v1)

Abstract: In a paper [Carcassi, Oldofredi and Aidala, Found Phys 54, 14 (2024)] it is claimed that the whole Harrigan--Spekkens framework of ontological models is inconsistent with quantum theory. They show this by showing that all pure quantum states in $\psi$-ontic models must be orthogonal. In this note, we identify some crucial mistakes in their argument to the extent that the main claim is incorrect.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. Gabriele Carcassi, Andrea Oldofredi and Christine A Aidala “On the reality of the quantum state once again: A no-go theorem for ψ𝜓\psiitalic_ψ-ontic models” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11842, 2022
  2. Nicholas Harrigan and Robert W Spekkens “Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states” In Foundations of Physics 40 Springer, 2010, pp. 125–157
  3. Matthew F Pusey, Jonathan Barrett and Terry Rudolph “On the reality of the quantum state” In Nature Physics 8.6 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2012, pp. 475–478
  4. Robert W Spekkens “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements” In Physical Review A 71.5 APS, 2005, pp. 052108
  5. Robert W Spekkens “The status of determinism in proofs of the impossibility of a noncontextual model of quantum theory” In Foundations of Physics 44 Springer, 2014, pp. 1125–1155
  6. David Schmid, Robert W Spekkens and Elie Wolfe “All the noncontextuality inequalities for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments with respect to any fixed set of operational equivalences” In Physical Review A 97.6 APS, 2018, pp. 062103
  7. “A structure theorem for generalized-noncontextual ontological models” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07161, 2020
  8. “Characterization of noncontextuality in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories” In PRX Quantum 2.1 APS, 2021, pp. 010331
  9. “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations” In Nature communications 7.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2016, pp. ncomms11780
  10. Ravi Kunjwal “Beyond the Cabello-Severini-Winter framework: Making sense of contextuality without sharpness of measurements” In Quantum 3 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2019, pp. 184
  11. Anubhav Chaturvedi, Máté Farkas and Victoria J Wright “Characterising and bounding the set of quantum behaviours in contextuality scenarios” In Quantum 5 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2021, pp. 484
  12. David Schmid, John H Selby and Robert W Spekkens “Addressing some common objections to generalized noncontextuality” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07282, 2023
  13. Mark M. Wilde “Quantum Information Theory” Cambridge University Press, 2013 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139525343
  14. “A classical extension of quantum mechanics” In Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 28.12 IOP Publishing, 1995, pp. 3329
  15. “A mathematical framework for operational fine tunings” In Quantum 7 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2023, pp. 948
  16. Christopher J Wood and Robert W Spekkens “The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning” In New Journal of Physics 17.3 IOP Publishing, 2015, pp. 033002
  17. Robert W Spekkens “The ontological identity of empirical indiscernibles: Leibniz’s methodological principle and its significance in the work of Einstein” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04628, 2019
  18. “Quantum prescriptions are more ontologically distinct than they are operationally distinguishable” In Quantum 4 Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften, 2020, pp. 345
  19. “Contextuality without incompatibility” In Physical Review Letters 130.23 APS, 2023, pp. 230201
  20. Matthew F Pusey “Robust preparation noncontextuality inequalities in the simplest scenario” In Physical Review A 98.2 APS, 2018, pp. 022112
  21. Massy Khoshbin, Lorenzo Catani and Matthew Leifer “Alternative robust ways of witnessing nonclassicality in the simplest scenario” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13474, 2023

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.