Go Green: Selected Configuration Interaction as a More Sustainable Alternative for High Accuracy
Abstract: Recently, a new distributed implementation of the full configuration interaction (FCI) method has been reported [Gao et al. J. Chem Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 1185]. Thanks to a hybrid parallelization scheme, the authors were able to compute the exact energy of propane (\ce{C3H8}) in the minimal basis STO-3G. This formidable task involves handling an active space of 26 electrons in 23 orbitals or a Hilbert space of \SI{1.3d12} determinants. This is, by far, the largest FCI calculation reported to date. Here, we illustrate how, from a general point of view, selected configuration interaction (SCI) can achieve microhartree accuracy at a fraction of the computational and memory cost, via a sparse exploration of the FCI space. The present SCI calculations are performed with the \textit{Configuration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection made Iteratively} (CIPSI) algorithm, as implemented in a determinant-driven way in the \textsc{quantum package} software. The present study reinforces the common wisdom that among the exponentially large number of determinants in the FCI space, only a tiny fraction of them significantly contribute to the energy. More importantly, it demonstrates the feasibility of achieving comparable accuracy using more reasonable and sustainable computational resources, hence reducing the ever-growing carbon footprint of computational chemistry.
- J. J. Eriksen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 418 (2021).
- N. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 280 (1980).
- P. J. Knowles and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 111, 315 (1984).
- P. J. Knowles and N. C. Handy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 54, 75 (1989a).
- P. J. Knowles and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2396 (1989b).
- B. S. Fales and B. G. Levine, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4708 (2015).
- C. F. Bender and E. R. Davidson, Phys. Rev. 183, 23 (1969).
- J. L. Whitten and M. Hackmeyer, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 5584 (1969).
- R. J. Buenker and S. D. Peyerimhoff, Theor. Chim. Acta 35, 33 (1974).
- S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
- S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).
- G. K.-L. Chan and S. Sharma, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 62, 465 (2011).
- J. J. Eriksen and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 5180 (2018).
- J. J. Eriksen and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 4873 (2019a).
- J. J. Eriksen and J. Gauss, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 27, 7910 (2019b).
- M. Motta and S. Zhang, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1364 (2018).
- M. Caffarel, T. Applencourt, E. Giner, and A. Scemama, “Using CIPSI Nodes in Diffusion Monte Carlo,” in Recent Progress in Quantum Monte Carlo (2016) Chap. 2, pp. 15–46.
- J. B. Schriber and F. A. Evangelista, J. Chem. Phys. 144, 161106 (2016).
- Y. Yao and C. J. Umrigar, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 4183 (2021).
- W. Liu and M. Hoffmann, Theor. Chem. Acc. 133, 1481 (2014).
- W. Liu and M. R. Hoffmann, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 1169 (2016).
- J. P. Coe, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 5739 (2018).
- H. G. A. Burton and P.-F. Loos, “Rationale for the extrapolation procedure in selected configuration interaction,” (2024), arXiv:2312.12530 [physics.chem-ph] .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.