Towards early fault tolerance on a 2$\times$N array of qubits equipped with shuttling
Abstract: It is well understood that a two-dimensional grid of locally-interacting qubits is a promising platform for achieving fault tolerant quantum computing. However in the near-future, it may prove less challenging to develop lower dimensional structures. In this paper, we show that such constrained architectures can also support fault tolerance; specifically we explore a 2$\times$N array of qubits where the interactions between non-neighbouring qubits are enabled by shuttling the logical information along the rows of the array. Despite the apparent constraints of this setup, we demonstrate that error correction is possible and identify the classes of codes that are naturally suited to this platform. Focusing on silicon spin qubits as a practical example of qubits believed to meet our requirements, we provide a protocol for achieving full universal quantum computation with the surface code, while also addressing the additional constraints that are specific to a silicon spin qubit device. Through numerical simulations, we evaluate the performance of this architecture using a realistic noise model, demonstrating that both surface code and more complex qLDPC codes efficiently suppress gate and shuttling noise to a level that allows for the execution of quantum algorithms within the classically intractable regime. This work thus brings us one step closer to the execution of quantum algorithms that outperform classical machines.
- C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits, Quantum 5, 433 (2021).
- Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction, Nature 595, 383 (2021).
- S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary (1998).
- A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction, Russian Mathematical Surveys 52, 1191 (1997).
- P. Panteleev and G. V. Kalachev, Degenerate quantum ldpc codes with good finite length performance, Quantum 5, 585 (2019).
- O. Higgott and N. P. Breuckmann, Improved single-shot decoding of higher-dimensional hypergraph-product codes, PRX Quantum 4, 020332 (2023).
- C. A. Pattison, A. Krishna, and J. Preskill, Hierarchical memories: Simulating quantum ldpc codes with local gates (2023), arXiv:2303.04798 [quant-ph] .
- Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, One-dimensional quantum computing with a ‘segmented chain’ is feasible with today’s gate fidelities, npj Quantum Information 4, 10.1038/s41534-018-0074-2 (2018).
- D. Litinski and F. v. Oppen, Lattice surgery with a twist: Simplifying clifford gates of surface codes, Quantum 2, 62 (2018).
- D. Litinski, A game of surface codes: Large-scale quantum computing with lattice surgery, Quantum 3, 128 (2019).
- Y. Li, A magic state’s fidelity can be superior to the operations that created it, New Journal of Physics 17, 023037 (2015).
- B. Buonacorsi, B. Shaw, and J. Baugh, Simulated coherent electron shuttling in silicon quantum dots, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.125406 (2020).
- J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052325 (2016).
- Z. Cai and S. C. Benjamin, Constructing smaller pauli twirling sets for arbitrary error channels, Scientific Reports 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-46722-7 (2019).
- R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, and K. Goyal, Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation, New Journal of Physics 9, 199 (2007).
- A. Richards, University of oxford advanced research computing 10.5281/zenodo.22558 (2015).
- Y. Tomita and K. M. Svore, Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise, Physical Review A 90, 10.1103/physreva.90.062320 (2014).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.