Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Generalized Rate Operator Quantum Jumps via Realization-Dependent Transformations

Published 19 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.12445v2)

Abstract: The dynamics of open quantum systems is often solved by stochastic unravellings where the average over the state vector realizations reproduces the density matrix evolution. We focus on quantum jump descriptions based on the rate operator formalism. In addition to displaying and exploiting different equivalent ways of writing the master equation, we introduce state-dependent rate operator transformations within the framework of stochastic pure state realizations, allowing us to extend and generalize the previously developed formalism. As a consequence, this improves the controllability of the stochastic realizations and subsequently greatly benefits when searching for optimal simulation schemes to solve open system dynamics. At a fundamental level, intriguingly, our results show that it is possible to have positive unravellings -- without reverse quantum jumps and avoiding the use of auxiliary degrees freedom -- in a number of example cases even when the corresponding dynamical map breaks the property of P-divisibility, thus being in the strongly non-Markovian regime.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University PressOxford, 2007).
  2. Á. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  3. I. Percival, Quantum State Diffusion (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
  4. K. Luoma, W. T. Strunz, and J. Piilo, Diffusive Limit of Non-Markovian Quantum Jumps, Physical Review Letters 125, 150403 (2020), arXiv:2004.12072 .
  5. M. Caiaffa, A. Smirne, and A. Bassi, Stochastic unraveling of positive quantum dynamics, Physical Review A 95, 062101 (2017), arXiv:1612.04546 .
  6. M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 101 (1998).
  7. J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Physical Review Letters 68, 580 (1992).
  8. A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Advances in Physics 63, 77 (2014).
  9. R. Dum, P. Zoller, and H. Ritsch, Monte Carlo simulation of the atomic master equation for spontaneous emission, Physical Review A 45, 4879 (1992a).
  10. J. Gambetta, T. Askerud, and H. M. Wiseman, Jumplike unravelings for non-Markovian open quantum systems, Physical Review A 69, 052104 (2004).
  11. I. Guevara and H. M. Wiseman, Completely positive quantum trajectories with applications to quantum state smoothing, Physical Review A 102, 052217 (2020).
  12. G. Perfetto, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Thermodynamics of quantum-jump trajectories of open quantum systems subject to stochastic resetting, SciPost Physics 13, 079 (2022).
  13. T. Basché, S. Kummer, and C. Bräuchle, Direct spectroscopic observation of quantum jumps of a single molecule, Nature 373, 132 (1995).
  14. S. Peil and G. Gabrielse, Observing the Quantum Limit of an Electron Cyclotron: QND Measurements of Quantum Jumps between Fock States, Physical Review Letters 83, 1287 (1999).
  15. R. Vijay, D. H. Slichter, and I. Siddiqi, Physical Review Letters 106, 110502 (2011).
  16. Á. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions, Physical Review Letters 105, 050403 (2010), arXiv:0911.4270 .
  17. A. Smirne, M. Caiaffa, and J. Piilo, Rate Operator Unraveling for Open Quantum System Dynamics, Physical Review Letters 124, 190402 (2020), arXiv:2004.09537 .
  18. L. Diósi, Orthogonal jumps of the wavefunction in white-noise potentials, Physics Letters A 112, 288 (1985), arXiv:1501.00274 .
  19. L. Diósi, Stochastic pure state representation for open quantum systems, Physics Letters A 114, 451 (1986), arXiv:1609.09636 .
  20. L. Diósi, Quantum stochastic processes as models for state vector reduction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 21, 2885 (1988).
  21. L. Diósi, New results on non-CP dynamics unearthed from urtexts of quantum state diffusion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 16LT01 (2017).
  22. M. Busse and K. Hornberger, Pointer basis induced by collisional decoherence, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43, 015303 (2010).
  23. L. Diósi and C. Kiefer, Robustness and Diffusion of Pointer States, Physical Review Letters 85, 3552 (2000).
  24. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N -level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 821 (1976).
  25. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976).
  26. D. Chruściński and A. Kossakowski, Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics: Local versus Nonlocal, Physical Review Letters 104, 070406 (2010).
  27. D. Chruściński, Dynamical maps beyond markovian regime, Physics Reports 992, 1 (2022).
  28. E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H.-P. Breuer, Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes, Physical Review A 81, 062115 (2010), arXiv:1002.2583 .
  29. A. Kossakowski, On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 247 (1972).
  30. A. Imamog¯lu, Stochastic wave-function approach to non-markovian systems, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3650 (1994).
  31. B. M. Garraway, Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2290 (1997a).
  32. B. M. Garraway, Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4636 (1997b).
  33. H.-P. Breuer, Genuine quantum trajectories for non-markovian processes, Phys. Rev. A 70, 012106 (2004).
  34. T. Becker, C. Netzer, and A. Eckardt, Quantum Trajectories for Time-Local Non-Lindblad Master Equations, Physical Review Letters 131, 160401 (2023), arXiv:2306.14876 .
  35. B. Donvil and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, Quantum trajectory framework for general time-local master equations., Nature communications 13, 4140 (2022).
  36. F. Settimo, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Entropic and trace-distance-based measures of non-Markovianity, Physical Review A 106, 042212 (2022), arXiv:2207.13183 .
  37. S. N. Filippov, A. N. Glinov, and L. Leppäjärvi, Phase Covariant Qubit Dynamics and Divisibility, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 41, 617 (2020), arXiv:1911.09468 .
  38. The code used for the simulations is available at https://github.com/federicoSettimo/Rate-operator.git.
  39. J. Teittinen and S. Maniscalco, Quantum Speed Limit and Divisibility of the Dynamical Map, Entropy 23, 331 (2021), arXiv:2101.11900 .
  40. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.