Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Photoelectron Polarization Vortexes in Strong-Field Ionization

Published 19 Feb 2024 in physics.atom-ph and quant-ph | (2402.11825v1)

Abstract: The spin polarization of photoelectrons induced by an intense linearly polarized laser field is investigated using numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation in companion with our analytic treatment via the spin-resolved strong-field approximation and classical trajectory Monte Carlo simulations. We demonstrate that, even though the total polarization vanishes upon averaging over the photoelectron momentum, momentum-resolved spin polarization is significant, typically exhibiting a vortex structure relative to the laser polarization axis. The polarization arises from the transfer of spin-orbital coupling in the bound state to the spin-correlated quantum orbits in the continuum. The rescattering of photoelectrons at the atomic core plays an important role in forming the polarization vortex structure, while there is no significant effect of the spin-orbit coupling during the continuum dynamics. Furthermore, spin-polarized electron holography is demonstrated, feasible for extracting fine structural information about the atom.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. J. Kessler, Electron spin polarization by low-energy scattering from unpolarized targets, Reviews of Modern Physics 41, 3 (1969).
  2. B. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and its application to topological materials, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 609 (2019).
  3. U. Fano, Spin orientation of photoelectrons ejected by circularly polarized light, Physical Review 178, 131 (1969).
  4. P. Lambropoulos, Spin-orbit coupling and photoelectron polarization in multiphoton ionization of atoms, Physical Review Letters 30, 413 (1973).
  5. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Nonadiabatic tunneling in circularly polarized laser fields: Physical picture and calculations, Physical Review A 84, 063415 (2011).
  6. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Nonadiabatic tunneling in circularly polarized laser fields. ii. derivation of formulas, Physical Review A 87, 013433 (2013a).
  7. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Spin-polarized electrons produced by strong-field ionization, Physical Review A 88, 013401 (2013b).
  8. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Hole dynamics and spin currents after ionization in strong circularly polarized laser fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 47, 204020 (2014a).
  9. E. Yakaboylu, M. Klaiber, and K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, Above-threshold ionization with highly charged ions in superstrong laser fields. iii. spin effects and their dependence on laser polarization, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063407 (2015).
  10. P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
  11. M. W. Walser, C. Szymanowski, and C. H. Keitel, Influence of spin-laser interaction on relativistic harmonic generation, Europhysics Letters 48, 533 (1999).
  12. S. X. Hu and C. H. Keitel, Spin signatures in intense laser-ion interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4709 (1999).
  13. A. S. Maxwell and L. B. Madsen, Relativistic and spin-orbit dynamics at non-relativistic intensities in strong-field ionization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15374  (2023).
  14. N. Rohringer and R. Santra, Multichannel coherence in strong-field ionization, Physical Review A 79, 053402 (2009).
  15. I. Barth and O. Smirnova, Hole dynamics and spin currents after ionization in strong circularly polarized laser fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 47, 204020 (2014b).
  16. S. Carlström, M. Spanner, and S. Patchkovskii, General time-dependent configuration-interaction singles. i. molecular case, Physical Review A 106, 043104 (2022a).
  17. L. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965).
  18. F. H. M. Faisal, Multiple absorption of laser photons by atoms, J. Phys. B. 6, L89 (1973).
  19. H. R. Reiss, Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1786 (1980).
  20. See the Supplemental Materials for the details.
  21. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
  22. V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. Telegdi, Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field, Physical Review Letters 2, 435 (1959).
  23. A. M. Perelomov, V. S. Popov, and M. V. Terent’ev, Ionization of atoms in an alternating electric field, Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 924 (1966).
  24. N. B. Delone and V. P. Krainov, Energy and angular electron spectra for the tunnel ionization of atoms by strong low-frequency radiation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8, 1207 (1991).
  25. T. Keil, S. V. Popruzhenko, and D. Bauer, Laser-driven recollisions under the coulomb barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 243003 (2016).
  26. N. I. Shvetsov-Shilovski and M. Lein, Semiclassical two-step model with quantum input: Quantum-classical approach to strong-field ionization, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053411 (2019).
  27. P.-L. He, N. Takemoto, and F. He, Photoelectron momentum distributions of atomic and molecular systems in strong circularly or elliptically polarized laser fields, Physical Review A 91, 063413 (2015).
  28. X.-B. Bian and A. D. Bandrauk, Attosecond time-resolved imaging of molecular structure by photoelectron holography, Physical Review Letters 108, 263003 (2012).
  29. Y. Zhou, O. I. Tolstikhin, and T. Morishita, Near-forward rescattering photoelectron holography in strong-field ionization: Extraction of the phase of the scattering amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 173001 (2016).

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.