Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

TITAN: A Distributed Large-Scale Trapped-Ion NISQ Computer

Published 16 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and cs.ET | (2402.11021v1)

Abstract: Trapped-Ion (TI) technology offers potential breakthroughs for Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) computing. TI qubits offer extended coherence times and high gate fidelity, making them appealing for large-scale NISQ computers. Constructing such computers demands a distributed architecture connecting Quantum Charge Coupled Devices (QCCDs) via quantum matter-links and photonic switches. However, current distributed TI NISQ computers face hardware and system challenges. Entangling qubits across a photonic switch introduces significant latency, while existing compilers generate suboptimal mappings due to their unawareness of the interconnection topology. In this paper, we introduce TITAN, a large-scale distributed TI NISQ computer, which employs an innovative photonic interconnection design to reduce entanglement latency and an advanced partitioning and mapping algorithm to optimize matter-link communications. Our evaluations show that TITAN greatly enhances quantum application performance by 56.6% and fidelity by 19.7% compared to existing systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. M Akhtar et al. 2023. A high-fidelity quantum matter-link between ion-trap microchip modules. Nature Communications 14, 1 (2023), 531.
  2. Frank Arute et al. 2019. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 7779 (2019), 505–510.
  3. Jonathan M. Baker et al. 2020. Time-Sliced Quantum Circuit Partitioning for Modular Architectures. In ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers.
  4. R. B. Blakestad et al. 2009. High-Fidelity Transport of Trapped-Ion Qubits through an 𝐗𝐗\mathbf{X}bold_X-Junction Trap Array. Physical Review Letters 102 (2009), 153002. Issue 15.
  5. Kenneth R Brown et al. 2016. Co-designing a scalable quantum computer with trapped atomic ions. npj Quantum Information 2, 1 (2016), 1–10.
  6. Stefanie Castillo. 2023. The Electronic Control System of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor: a Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access (2023).
  7. Andrew J Daley et al. 2022. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature 607, 7920 (2022), 667–676.
  8. L Feng et al. 2020. Efficient ground-state cooling of large trapped-ion chains with an electromagnetically-induced-transparency tripod scheme. Physical Review Letters 125, 5 (2020), 053001.
  9. J. P. Gaebler et al. 2016. High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for Be+9superscriptsuperscriptBe9{{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT roman_Be start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Ion Qubits. Physical Review Letters 117 (Aug 2016), 060505. Issue 6.
  10. M Gutiérrez et al. 2019. Transversality and lattice surgery: Exploring realistic routes toward coupled logical qubits with trapped-ion quantum processors. Physical Review A 99, 2 (2019), 022330.
  11. Chenyi Huang et al. 2023. Enhancing adversarial robustness of quantum neural networks by adding noise layers. New Journal of Physics 25, 8 (2023), 083019.
  12. David Kielpinski et al. 2002. Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer. Nature 417, 6890 (2002), 709–711.
  13. William M. Mellette et al. 2015. Scaling Limits of MEMS Beam-Steering Switches for Data Center Networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology 33, 15 (2015).
  14. Nikolaj Moll et al. 2018. Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices. Quantum Science and Technology 3, 3 (2018), 030503.
  15. Christopher Monroe et al. 2014. Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic interconnects. Physical Review A 89, 2 (2014), 022317.
  16. Christopher Monroe and Jungsang Kim. 2013. Scaling the ion trap quantum processor. Science 339, 6124 (2013).
  17. S. A. Moses et al. 2023. A Race Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor. arXiv:2305.03828 [quant-ph]
  18. Prakash Murali et al. 2020. Architecting noisy intermediate-scale trapped ion quantum computers. In IEEE International Symposium on Computer Architecture.
  19. Towards simulation of the dynamics of materials on quantum computers. Physical Review B 101, 18 (2020), 184305.
  20. LJ Stephenson et al. 2020. High-rate, high-fidelity entanglement of qubits across an elementary quantum network. Physical review letters 124, 11 (2020), 110501.
  21. Pengfei Wang et al. 2021. Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour. Nature communications 12, 1 (2021), 233.
  22. Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer. Nature communications 10, 1 (2019), 5464.
  23. Anbang Wu et al. 2022. AutoComm: A Framework for Enabling Efficient Communication in Distributed Quantum Programs. In IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.