Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Non-contact photoacoustic imaging with a silicon photonics-based Laser Doppler Vibrometer

Published 14 Feb 2024 in eess.IV, physics.app-ph, and physics.optics | (2402.10966v1)

Abstract: Photoacoustic imaging has emerged as a powerful, non-invasive modality for various biomedical applications. Conventional photoacoustic systems require contact-based ultrasound detection and expensive and bulky high-power lasers for the excitation. The use of contact-based detectors involves the risk of contamination, which is undesirable for most biomedical applications. While other non-contact detection methods can be bulky, in this paper, we demonstrate compact and contactless detection of photoacoustic signals on silicone samples embedded with ink-filled channels, mimicking tissue with blood-carrying veins. A silicon photonics-based Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) detects the acoustic waves excited by a compact pulsed laser diode. By scanning the LDV beam over the surface of the sample, 2D photoacoustic images were reconstructed of the sample. Photoacoustic signals with absorption coefficients within the physiological range were detected by this setup.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs. \JournalTitleScience 335, 1458–1462, DOI: 10.1126/science.1216210 (2012).
  2. Photoacoustic microscopy. \JournalTitleLaser and Photonics Reviews 7, 758–778, DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201200060 (2013).
  3. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. \JournalTitleNature Biotechnology 24, 848–851, DOI: 10.1038/nbt1220 (2006).
  4. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. \JournalTitleReview of Scientific Instruments 77, 041101, DOI: 10.1063/1.2195024 (2006).
  5. Kim, C. et al. In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bioconjugated gold nanocages. \JournalTitleACS Nano 4, 4559–4564, DOI: 10.1021/nn100736c (2010).
  6. Seeing through the skin: Photoacoustic tomography of skin vasculature and beyond. \JournalTitleJID Innovations 1, 100039, DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100039 (2021).
  7. Sun, N. et al. Photoacoustic microscopy of vascular adaptation and tissue oxygen metabolism during cutaneous wound healing. \JournalTitleBiomedical Optics Express 13, 2695, DOI: 10.1364/boe.456198 (2022).
  8. Na, S. et al. Massively parallel functional photoacoustic computed tomography of the human brain. \JournalTitleNature Biomedical Engineering 6, 584–592, DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00735-8 (2022).
  9. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Principle and Technical Realization (Springer, 2019).
  10. Xu, G. et al. Acoustic characterization of polydimethylsiloxane for microscale acoustofluidics. \JournalTitlePhysical Review Applied 13, 054069, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.054069 (2020).
  11. Qiu, Y. et al. Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (pmut) arrays for integrated sensing, actuation and imaging. \JournalTitleSensors 15, 8020–8041, DOI: 10.3390/s150408020 (2015).
  12. Khuri-Yakub, B. T. & Ömer Oralkan. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy. \JournalTitleJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 21, 054004, DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/21/5/054004 (2011).
  13. Sartoretti, T. et al. Bacterial contamination of ultrasound probes in different radiological institutions before and after specific hygiene training: do we have a general hygienical problem? \JournalTitleEuropean Radiology 27, 4181–4187, DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4812-1 (2017).
  14. Westerveld, W. J. et al. Sensitive, small, broadband and scalable optomechanical ultrasound sensor in silicon photonics. \JournalTitleNature Photonics 15, 341–345, DOI: 10.1038/s41566-021-00776-0 (2021).
  15. Looking at sound: optoacoustics with all-optical ultrasound detection. \JournalTitleLight: Science and Applications 7, DOI: 10.1038/s41377-018-0036-7 (2018).
  16. Tian, C. et al. Non-contact photoacoustic imaging using a commercial heterodyne interferometer. \JournalTitleIEEE Sensors Journal 16, 8381–8388, DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2611569 (2016).
  17. Wang, Y. et al. Complete-noncontact photoacoustic microscopy by detection of initial pressures using a 3×3 coupler-based fiber-optic interferometer. \JournalTitleBiomedical Optics Express 11, 505, DOI: 10.1364/boe.381129 (2020).
  18. Li, Y. et al. Six-beam homodyne laser doppler vibrometry based on silicon photonics technology. \JournalTitleOptics Express 26, 3638, DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.003638 (2018).
  19. Homodyne laser doppler vibrometer on silicon-on-insulator with integrated 90 degree optical hybrids. \JournalTitleOptics Express 21, 13342, DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.013342 (2013).
  20. Portable and affordable light source-based photoacoustic tomography. \JournalTitleSensors 20, 1–29, DOI: 10.3390/s20216173 (2020).
  21. Siew, S. Y. et al. Review of silicon photonics technology and platform development. \JournalTitleJournal of Lightwave Technology 39, 4374–4389, DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3066203 (2021).
  22. High-performance 90° hybrid based on a silicon-on-insulator multimode interference coupler. \JournalTitleOptics Letters 36, 178–180, DOI: 10.1364/OL.36.000178 (2011).
  23. A compensation method for nonlinearity errors in optical interferometry. \JournalTitleSensors 23, 7942, DOI: 10.3390/s23187942 (2023).
  24. Variation in the viscoelastic properties of polydimethylsiloxane (pdms) with the temperature at ultrasonic frequencies. \JournalTitlePolymer Testing 124, 108067, DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108067 (2023).
  25. Non-contact photoacoustic tomography and ultrasonography for tissue imaging. \JournalTitleBiomed. Opt. Express 3, 16–25, DOI: 10.1364/BOE.3.000016 (2012).
  26. k-wave: Matlab toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. \JournalTitleJournal of Biomedical Optics 15, 021314, DOI: 10.1117/1.3360308 (2010).
  27. Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. \JournalTitlePhotoacoustics 2, 87–101, DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002 (2014).
  28. Beard, P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. \JournalTitleInterface Focus 1, 602–631, DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028 (2011).
  29. Analytic explanation of spatial resolution related to bandwidth and detector aperture size in thermoacoustic or photoacoustic reconstruction. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 67, 15, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.056605 (2003).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.