Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Correcting Projection Effects in CMEs using GCS-based Large Statistics of Multi-viewpoint Observations

Published 11 Feb 2024 in astro-ph.SR | (2402.07961v1)

Abstract: This study addresses the limitations of single-viewpoint observations of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) by presenting results from a 3D catalog of 360 CMEs during solar cycle 24, fitted using the GCS model. The dataset combines 326 previously analyzed CMEs and 34 newly examined events, categorized by their source regions into active region (AR) eruptions, active prominence (AP) eruptions, and prominence eruptions (PE). Estimates of errors are made using a bootstrapping approach. The findings highlight that the average 3D speed of CMEs is ∼\sim1.3 times greater than the 2D speed. PE CMEs tend to be slow, with an average speed of 432 km s<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}. AR and AP speeds are higher, at 723 km s<sup>−1s<sup>{-1} and 813 km s<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}, respectively, with the latter having fewer slow CMEs. The distinctive behavior of AP CMEs is attributed to factors like overlying magnetic field distribution or geometric complexities leading to less accurate GCS fits. A linear fit of projected speed to width gives a gradient of 2 km s<sup>−1deg<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}deg<sup>{-1}, which increases to 5 km s<sup>−1deg<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}deg<sup>{-1} when the GCS-fitted `true' parameters are used. Notably, AR CMEs exhibit a high gradient of 7 km s<sup>−1deg<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}deg<sup>{-1}, while AP CMEs show a gradient of 4 km s<sup>−1deg<sup>−1s<sup>{-1}deg<sup>{-1}. PE CMEs, however, lack a significant speed-width relationship. We show that fitting multi-viewpoint CME images to a geometrical model such as GCS is important to study the statistical properties of CMEs, and can lead to a deeper insight into CME behavior that is essential for improving future space weather forecasting.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.