Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Perfectly Spherical Bloch Hyper-spheres from Quantum Matrix Geometry

Published 11 Feb 2024 in quant-ph, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, cond-mat.stat-mech, and hep-th | (2402.07149v2)

Abstract: Exploiting analogies between the precessing quantum spin system and the charge-monopole system, we construct Bloch hyper-spheres with $\it{exact}$ spherical symmetries in arbitrary dimensions. Such Bloch hyper-spheres are realized as a collection of the orbits of a precessing quantum spin. The geometry of Bloch hyper-spheres is exactly equal to the quantum Nambu geometry of higher dimensional fuzzy spheres. The stabilizer group symmetry of the Bloch hyper-sphere necessarily introduces degenerate spin-coherent states, giving rise to the Wilczek-Zee geometric phase of non-Abelian monopoles associated with the hyper-sphere holonomy. The degenerate spin-coherent states induce matrix-valued quantum geometric tensors. While the minimal spin Bloch hyper-spheres exhibit similar properties in even and odd dimensions, their large spin counterparts differ qualitatively depending on the parity of the dimensions. Exact correspondences between spin-coherent states and monopole harmonics in higher dimensions are established. We also investigate density matrices described by Bloch hyper-balls and elucidate their corresponding statistical and geometric properties, such as von Neumann entropies and Bures quantum metrics.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (94)
  1. Ingemar Bengtsson, Karol Zyczkowski, “Geometry of Quantum States”, Cambridge University Press (2006).
  2. Michael A. Nielsen, Issac L. Chuang, “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information”, Cambridge University Press (2005).
  3. Dariusz Chruściński, Andrzej Jamiolkowski, “Geometric Phases in Classical and Quantum Mechanics”, Birkhäuser (2004).
  4. Arno Bohm, Ali Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi, Qian Niu, Joseph Zwanziger, “The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems”, Springer (2003).
  5. Päivi Törmä, “Essay: Where Can Quantum Geometry Lead Us?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 240001; arXiv:2312.11516.
  6. J. Lambert, E. S. Sorensen, “From Classical to Quantum Information Geometry: A Guide for Physicists”, New J. Phys. 25 (2023) 081201; arXiv:2302.13515.
  7. Felix Bloch, “Nuclear Induction”, Phys. Rev. 70 (1946) 460.
  8. M. V. Berry, “Quantum phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392 (1984) 45-57.
  9. G. Herzberg, H. C. Longuet-Higgins, “Intersection of potential energy surfaces in polyatomic molecules”, Disc. Faraday Soc. 35 (1963) 77.
  10. Frank Wilczek, A. Zee, “Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 2111.
  11. Shaojie Ma, Hongwei Jia, Yangang Bi, Shangqiang Ning, Fuxin Guan, Hongchao Liu, Chenjie Wang, Shuang Zhang, “Gauge Field Induced Chiral Zero Mode in Five-Dimensional Yang Monopole Metamaterials”, Phys.Rev.Lett. 130 (2023) 243801; arXiv:2305.13566.
  12. Xingen Zheng, Tian Chen, Weixuan Zhang, Houjun Sun, Xiangdong Zhang, “Exploring topological phase transition and Weyl physics in five dimensions with electric circuits”, Phys.Rev.Res. 4 (2022) 033203; arXiv:2209.08492.
  13. S. Sugawa, F. Salces-Carcoba, A. R. Perry, Y. Yue, I. B. Spielman, “Second Chern number of a quantum-simulated non-Abelian Yang monopole”, Science 360 (2018) 1429-1434.
  14. Sh. Ma, Y. Bi, Q. Guo, B. Yang, O. You, J. Feng, H.-B. Sun, Sh. Zhang, “Linked Weyl surfaces and Weyl arcs in photonic metamaterials”, Science 373 (2021) 572-576.
  15. Tracy Li, Lucia Duca, Martin Reitter, Fabian Grusdt, Eugene Demler, Manuel Endres, Monika Schleier-Smith, Immanuel Bloch, Ulrich Schneider, “Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines”, Science 352 (2016) 1094; arXiv:1509.02185.
  16. Frank Wilczek, “Introduction to quantum matter”, Phys. Scr. B T146 (2012) 014001.
  17. H.M. Price, O. Zilberberg, T. Ozawa, I. Carusotto, N. Goldman, “Four-Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect with Ultracold Atoms”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 195303.
  18. H.M. Price, O. Zilberberg, T. Ozawa, I. Carusotto, N. Goldman, “Measurement of Chern numbers through center-of-mass responses”, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 245113.
  19. T. Ozawa, H.M. Price,N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, I. Carusotto, “Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics”, Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016) 043827.
  20. You Wang, Hannah M. Price, Baile Zhang, Y. D. Chong, “Circuit implementation of a four-dimensional topological insulator”, Nature Communications, 11 (2020) 2356; arXiv:2001.07427.
  21. John R. Klauder, “The action option and a Feynman quantization of spinor fields in terms of ordinary c-numbers”, Ann. Phys. 11 (1960) 123-168.
  22. J. M. Radcliffe “Some properties of coherent spin states”, J. Phys. A 4 (1971) 313.
  23. A. M. Perelomov, “Coherent States for Arbitrary Lie Group”, Commun. Math. Phys. 26 (1972) 222-236.
  24. F. A. Arecchi, Eric Courtens, Robert Gilmore, Harry Thomas, “Atomic coherent states in quantum optics’, Phys. Rev. A 6 (1972) 2211.
  25. P.A.M. Dirac, “Quantized singularities in the electromagnetic field”, Proc. Royal Soc. London, A133 (1931) 60-72.
  26. T.T. Wu, C.N. Yang, “Dirac Monopoles without Strings: Monopole Harmonics”, Nucl.Phys. B107 (1976) 365-380.
  27. F. T. Hioe and J. H. Eberly, “N𝑁Nitalic_N-Level Coherence Vector and Higher Conservation Laws in Quantum Optics and Quantum Mechanics”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 838.
  28. Gen Kimura, “The Bloch Vector for N-Level Systems”, Phys. Lett. A 314 (2003) 339; arXiv:quant-ph/0301152.
  29. Mark S. Byrd, Navin Khaneja, “Characterization of the positivity of the density matrix in terms of the coherence vector representation”, Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 062322; arXiv:quant-ph/0302024.
  30. Ansgar Graf and Frédéric Piéchon, “Berry Curvature and Quantum Metric in N𝑁Nitalic_N-band systems : an Eigenprojector Approach”, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 085114; arXiv:2102.09899.
  31. Cameron J.D. Kemp, Nigel R. Cooper and F. Nur Ünal, “Nested-sphere description of the N-level Chern number and the generalized Bloch hypersphere”, Phys. Rev. Research 4 (2022) 023120; arXiv:2110.06934.
  32. J. Anandan, L. Stodolsky, “Some geometrical considerations of Berry’s phase”, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 2597-2600.
  33. D M Gitman and A L Shelepin, “Coherent states of SU(N) groups”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 26 (1993) 313-327; hep-th/9208017.
  34. Sven Gnutzmanny and Marek Kuś, “Coherent states and the classical limit on irreducible S⁢U3𝑆subscript𝑈3SU_{3}italic_S italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT representations”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998) 9871-9896.
  35. A. V. Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, A. M. Rey, “Two-orbital S⁢U⁢(N)𝑆𝑈𝑁SU(N)italic_S italic_U ( italic_N ) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms”, Nature Physics (2010) 289 - 295; arXiv:0905.2610.
  36. Mark S. Byrd, Luis J. Boya, Mark Mims, E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Geometry of n-state systems, pure and mixed”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 87 (2007) 012006.
  37. D. Uskov, A.R.P. Rau, “Geometric phase and Bloch-sphere construction for SU(N𝑁Nitalic_N) groups with a complete description of the SU(4444) group”, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 022331; arXiv:0801.2091.
  38. A. R. P. Rau, “Symmetries and Geometries of Qubits, and Their Uses”, Symmetry 13 (2021) 1732; arXiv:2103.14105.
  39. C. Alden Mead, “Molecular Kramers Degeneracy and Non-Abelian Adiabatic Phase Factors”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 161.
  40. J.E. Avron, L. Sadun, J. Segert, and B. Simon, “Topological Invariants in Fermi Systems with Time-Reversal Invariance”, Phys.Rev.Lett.61 (1988) 1329.
  41. J.E. Avron, L. Sadun, J. Segert, and B. Simon, “Chern Numbers, Quaternions, and Berry’s Phases in Fermi Systems”, Commun.Math.Phys.124 (1989) 124.
  42. C. Alden Mead, “The geometric phase in molecular systems”, Rev.Mod.Phys. 64 (1992) 51.
  43. S.E. Apsel, C.C. Chancey, M.C.M. O’Brien, “Berry phase and the Γ8⊗(τ2⊕ϵ)tensor-productsubscriptnormal-Γ8direct-sumsubscript𝜏2italic-ϵ\Gamma_{8}\otimes(\tau_{2}\oplus\epsilon)roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊗ ( italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊕ italic_ϵ ) Jahn-Teller system”, Phys.Rev. B 45 (1992) 5251.
  44. Congjun Wu, Jiang-ping Hu, Shou-cheng Zhang, “Exact SO(5) Symmetry in the Spin-3=2 Fermionic System”, Phys.Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 186402.
  45. Jonas Larson, Erik Sjöqvist, Patrik Öhberg, “Conical Intersections in Physics”, Springer (2020).
  46. Shinsei Ryu, Andreas P. Schnyder, Akira Furusaki, Andreas W. W. Ludwig, “Topological insulators and superconductors: ten-fold way and dimensional hierarchy”, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 065010; arXiv:0912.2157.
  47. Péter Lévay, “Geometrical description of SU(2) Berry phases”, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2837 (1990).
  48. Péter Lévay, “Quaternionic gauge fields and the geometric phase”, J. Math. Phys. 32, 2347 (1991).
  49. M.T. Johnsson, J.R. Aitchison, “The S⁢U⁢(2)𝑆𝑈2SU(2)italic_S italic_U ( 2 ) instanton and the adiabatic evolution of two Kramers doublets”, Jour. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 (1997) 2085.
  50. Chen Ning Yang, “Generalization of Dirac’s monopole to SU2 gauge fields”, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978) 320.
  51. Chen Ning Yang, “SU2 monopole harmonics”, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978) 2622.
  52. A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, A.S. Schwartz and Yu. S. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations”, Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 85-87.
  53. Kazuki Hasebe, “Relativistic Landau Models and Generation of Fuzzy Spheres”, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 31 (2016) 1650117; arXiv:1511.04681.
  54. Goro Ishiki, Takaki Matsumoto, Hisayoshi Muraki,, “Kähler structure in the commutative limit of matrix geometry”, JHEP 08 (2016) 042; arXiv:1603.09146.
  55. Kazuki Hasebe, “S⁢O⁢(4)𝑆𝑂4SO(4)italic_S italic_O ( 4 ) Landau Models and Matrix Geometry”, Nucl.Phys. B 934 (2018) 149-211; arXiv:1712.07767.
  56. G. Ishiki, T. Matsumoto, H. Muraki, “Information metric, Berry connection, and Berezin-Toeplitz quantization for matrix geometry”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 026002; arXiv:1804.00900.
  57. Kaho Matsuura, Asato Tsuchiya, “Matrix geometry for ellipsoids”, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 033B05.
  58. V. P. Nair, “Landau-Hall states and Berezin-Toeplitz quantization of matrix algebras”, Phys.Rev. D 102 (2020) 025015; arXiv:2001.05040.
  59. Kazuki Hasebe, “SO(5) Landau models and nested matrix geometry”, Nucl.Phys. B 956 (2020) 115012; arXiv:2002.05010.
  60. Hiroyuki Adachi, Goro Ishiki, Takaki Matsumoto, Kaishu Saito, “The matrix regularization for Riemann surfaces with magnetic fluxes”, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 106009; arXiv:2002.02993.
  61. Kazuki Hasebe, “SO(5) Landau Model and 4D Quantum Hall Effect in The SO(4) Monopole Background”, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 065010; arXiv:2112.03038.
  62. Harold C. Steinacker, “Quantum (Matrix) Geometry and Quasi-Coherent States”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 (2021) 055401; arXiv:2009.03400.
  63. Hiroyuki Adachi, Goro Ishiki, Satoshi Kanno, “Vector bundles on fuzzy Kähler manifolds”, arXiv:2210.01397.
  64. Kazuki Hasebe, “Generating Quantum Matrix Geometry from Gauge Quantum Mechanics”, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 126023; arXiv:2310.01051.
  65. Wei Zhu, Chao Han, Emilie Huffman, Johannes S. Hofmann, and Yin-Chen He, “Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization”, Phys.Rev. X 13 (2023) 021009; arXiv:2210.13482.
  66. Yale Fan, Willy Fischler, and Eric Kubischta, “Quantum error correction in the lowest Landau level”, Phys.Rev. A 107 (2023) 032411; arXiv:2210.16957.
  67. Gabriel Cuomo, Zohar Komargodski, Márk Mezei, Avia Raviv-Moshe, “Spin Impurities, Wilson Lines and Semiclassics”, JHEP 06 (2022) 112; arXiv:2202.00040.
  68. Gabriel Cuomo, Anton de la Fuente, Alexander Monin, David Pirtskhalava, Riccardo Rattazzi, “Rotating superfluids and spinning charged operators in conformal field theory”, Phys.Rev. D 97 (2018) 045012; arXiv:1711.02108.
  69. Gabriel Cuomo, Luca V. Delacretaz, Umang Mehta, “Large Charge Sector of 3d Parity-Violating CFTs”, JHEP 05 (2021) 115; arXiv:
  70. F.D.M. Haldane, “Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: a hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 605-608.
  71. J. J. Sakurai, Jim Napolitano, “Modern Quantum Mechanics”, Cambridge University Press (2020).
  72. J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, “Riemannian Structure on Manifolds of Quantum States”, Commun. Math. Phys. 76 (1980) 289-301.
  73. Kazuki Hasebe, “A Unified Construction of Skyrme-type Non-linear sigma Models via The Higher Dimensional Landau Models”, Nucl.Phys. B 961 (2020) 115250; arXiv:2006.06152.
  74. S.C. Zhang and J.P. Hu, “A four dimensional generalization of the quantum Hall effect”, Science 294 (2001) 823; cond-mat/0110572.
  75. Judith Castelino, Sangmin Lee, Washington Taylor, “Longitudinal 5-branes as 4-spheres in Matrix theory”, Nucl.Phys.B526 (1998) 334-350; hep-th/9712105.
  76. H. Grosse, C. Klimcik, P. Presnajder, “On Finite 4D Quantum Field Theory in Non-Commutative Geometry”, Commun.Math.Phys. 180 (1996) 429-438; hep-th/9602115.
  77. Kazuki Hasebe, “Chiral topological insulator on Nambu 3-algebraic geometry”, Nucl.Phys. B 886 (2014) 681-690; arXiv:1403.7816.
  78. V.P. Nair, S. Randjbar-Daemi, “Quantum Hall effect on S3superscript𝑆3S^{3}italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, edge states and fuzzy S3/𝐙2superscript𝑆3subscript𝐙2S^{3}/{\bf Z}_{2}italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / bold_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT”, Nucl.Phys. B679 (2004) 447-463; hep-th/0309212.
  79. Z. Guralnik, S. Ramgoolam, “On the Polarization of Unstable D0-Branes into Non-Commutative Odd Spheres”, JHEP 0102 (2001) 032; hep-th/0101001.
  80. Sanjaye Ramgoolam, “Higher dimensional geometries related to fuzzy odd-dimensional spheres”, JHEP 0210 (2002) 064; hep-th/0207111.
  81. Anirban Basu, Jeffrey A. Harvey, “The M2-M5 Brane System and a Generalized Nahm’s Equation”, Nucl.Phys. B713 (2005) 136-150; hep-th/0412310.
  82. M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, M. Torabian, “Classification of All 1/2 BPS Solutions of the Tiny Graviton Matrix Theory”, JHEP 0504 (2005) 001; hep-th/0501001.
  83. K. Hasebe and Y. Kimura, “Dimensional Hierarchy in Quantum Hall Effects on Fuzzy Spheres”, Phys.Lett. B 602 (2004) 255; hep-th/0310274.
  84. Kazuki Hasebe, “Higher Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect as A-Class Topological Insulator”, Nucl.Phys. B 886 (2014) 952-1002; arXiv:1403.5066.
  85. Kazuki Hasebe, “Higher (Odd) Dimensional Quantum Hall Effect and Extended Dimensional Hierarchy”, Nucl.Phys. B 920 (2017) 475-520; arXiv:1612.05853.
  86. See for instance, F. Iachello, “Lie Algebras and Applications”, (Lecture Notes in Physics) Springer (2006).
  87. Kazuki Hasebe, “Hopf Maps, Lowest Landau Level, and Fuzzy Spheres”, SIGMA 6 (2010) 071; arXiv:1009.1192.
  88. Joshua DeBellis, Christian Saemann, Richard J. Szabo, “Quantized Nambu-Poisson Manifolds and n-Lie Algebras”, J.Math.Phys.51 (2010) 122303; arXiv:1001.3275.
  89. Takehiro Azuma, Maxime Bagnoud, “Curved-space classical solutions of a massive supermatrix model”, Nucl.Phys. B 651 (2003) 71-86; hep-th/0209057.
  90. Takehiro Azuma, “Matrix models and the gravitational interaction”, hep-th/0401120.
  91. Donald Bures, “An extension of Kakutani’s theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*-algebras”, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135 (1969) 199.
  92. Matthias Hübner, “Explicit computation of the Bures distance for density matrices”, Phys. Lett. A 163 (1992) 239.
  93. See for instance, Chap.8 in Steven Weinberg, “Gravitation and cosmology”, Wiley (1972).
  94. A.J. MacFarlane, “Generalizations of σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ-models and C⁢pN𝐶superscript𝑝𝑁Cp^{N}italic_C italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models, and instantons”, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 239.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free