Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exploring freeze out and flow using exact solutions of conformal hydrodynamics

Published 5 Feb 2024 in nucl-th, hep-th, and nucl-ex | (2402.03568v1)

Abstract: Exact solutions to the equations of hydrodynamics provide valuable benchmark tests for numerical hydrodynamic codes and also provide useful insights into the nature of hydrodynamic flow. In this paper, we introduce two novel, closely related exact solutions with non-trivial rapidity dependence which are generalizations of the well-known Gubser flow solution to conformal hydrodynamics. We then use one of our solutions to explore the consequences of choosing between two different criteria for implementing the freeze out process in fluid dynamical simulations of nuclear collisions: freeze out at constant temperature vs. freeze out at constant Knudsen number. We find that, employing our exact solution, the differences between these freeze out criteria are heavily influenced by the presence of strong collective flow. Our results highlight the importance of accurately describing the freeze out process in collisions with large flow gradients, particularly in small systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. S. Jeon and U. Heinz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530010 (2015), arXiv:1503.03931 [hep-ph] .
  2. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th] .
  3. J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 211 (2018), arXiv:1801.03477 [nucl-ex] .
  4. J. Adolfsson et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 288 (2020), arXiv:2003.10997 [hep-ph] .
  5. P. Bozek and I. Wyskiel-Piekarska, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064915 (2012), arXiv:1203.6513 [nucl-th] .
  6. P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. C 88, 014903 (2013), arXiv:1304.3044 [nucl-th] .
  7. R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351 (2017), arXiv:1701.07145 [nucl-th] .
  8. D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 242301 (2021), arXiv:2010.03928 [hep-ph] .
  9. J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 222302 (2016), arXiv:1512.06104 [nucl-ex] .
  10. U. W. Heinz, in 2nd CERN-CLAF School of High Energy Physics (2004) pp. 165–238, arXiv:hep-ph/0407360 .
  11. C. Plumberg et al., in 30th International Conference on Ultrarelativstic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (2023) arXiv:2312.07415 [hep-ph] .
  12. H. Holopainen and P. Huovinen, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 389, 012018 (2012), arXiv:1207.7331 [hep-ph] .
  13. H. Niemi and G. S. Denicol,   (2014), arXiv:1404.7327 [nucl-th] .
  14. P. Huovinen and H. Holopainen, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 10, 913 (2017).
  15. U. W. Heinz and J. S. Moreland, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1271, 012018 (2019), arXiv:1904.06592 [nucl-th] .
  16. C. Plumberg, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054908 (2020a), arXiv:2008.01709 [nucl-th] .
  17. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983).
  18. S. S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. D 82, 085027 (2010), arXiv:1006.0006 [hep-th] .
  19. S. S. Gubser and A. Yarom, Nucl. Phys. B 846, 469 (2011), arXiv:1012.1314 [hep-th] .
  20. J. Weil et al. (SMASH), Phys. Rev. C 94, 054905 (2016), arXiv:1606.06642 [nucl-th] .
  21. C. Plumberg,   (2020b), arXiv:2010.11957 [nucl-th] .
  22. W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979).
  23. T. Kalaydzhyan and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054913 (2015), arXiv:1503.05213 [hep-ph] .
  24. F. Cooper and G. Frye, Phys. Rev. D 10, 186 (1974).
  25. M. P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072501 (2015), arXiv:1503.07514 [hep-th] .

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.