Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

I came, I saw, I certified: some perspectives on the safety assurance of cyber-physical systems (2401.16633v1)

Published 30 Jan 2024 in cs.SE and cs.AI

Abstract: The execution failure of cyber-physical systems (e.g., autonomous driving systems, unmanned aerial systems, and robotic systems) could result in the loss of life, severe injuries, large-scale environmental damage, property destruction, and major economic loss. Hence, such systems usually require a strong justification that they will effectively support critical requirements (e.g., safety, security, and reliability) for which they were designed. Thus, it is often mandatory to develop compelling assurance cases to support that justification and allow regulatory bodies to certify such systems. In such contexts, detecting assurance deficits, relying on patterns to improve the structure of assurance cases, improving existing assurance case notations, and (semi-)automating the generation of assurance cases are key to develop compelling assurance cases and foster consumer acceptance. We therefore explore challenges related to such assurance enablers and outline some potential directions that could be explored to tackle them.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Mithila Sivakumar (5 papers)
  2. Alvine B. Belle (7 papers)
  3. Kimya Khakzad Shahandashti (7 papers)
  4. Oluwafemi Odu (6 papers)
  5. Hadi Hemmati (37 papers)
  6. Segla Kpodjedo (3 papers)
  7. Song Wang (313 papers)
  8. Opeyemi O. Adesina (1 paper)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com