Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gravitational laser: the stimulated radiation of gravitational waves from the clouds of ultralight bosons

Published 29 Jan 2024 in gr-qc and astro-ph.CO | (2401.16096v1)

Abstract: Stimulated radiation and gravitational waves (GWs) are two of the most important predictions made by Albert Einstein. In this work, we demonstrate that stimulated GW radiation can occur within gravitational atoms, which consist of Kerr black holes and the surrounding boson clouds formed through superradiance. The presence of GWs induces mixing between different states of the gravitational atoms, leading to resonant transitions between two states when the GW wavenumber closely matches the energy difference. Consequently, the energy and angular momentum released from these transitions lead to the amplification of GWs, resulting in an exponential increase in the transition rate. Remarkably, the transitions complete within a much shorter time compared to the lifetime of the cloud. These stimulated transitions give rise to a novel GW signal that is strong and directed, distinguished from the previously predicted continuous GWs originating from clouds of ultralight bosons.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  2. I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018), arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph] .
  3. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166, 196 (1986).
  4. W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Cold and fuzzy dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003365 .
  5. R. Essig et al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (2013) arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph] .
  6. T. J. M. Zouros and D. M. Eardley, INSTABILITIES OF MASSIVE SCALAR PERTURBATIONS OF A ROTATING BLACK HOLE, Annals Phys. 118, 139 (1979).
  7. S. L. Detweiler, KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION AND ROTATING BLACK HOLES, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2323 (1980).
  8. S. R. Dolan, Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 76, 084001 (2007), arXiv:0705.2880 [gr-qc] .
  9. A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044026 (2011), arXiv:1004.3558 [hep-th] .
  10. R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys. 906, pp.1 (2015), arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc] .
  11. S. Endlich and R. Penco, A Modern Approach to Superradiance, JHEP 05, 052, arXiv:1609.06723 [hep-th] .
  12. S. Bao, Q. Xu, and H. Zhang, Improved analytic solution of black hole superradiance, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064016 (2022), arXiv:2201.10941 [gr-qc] .
  13. H. Yoshino and H. Kodama, Gravitational radiation from an axion cloud around a black hole: Superradiant phase, PTEP 2014, 043E02 (2014), arXiv:1312.2326 [gr-qc] .
  14. A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, and X. Huang, Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084011 (2015), arXiv:1411.2263 [hep-ph] .
  15. C. Palomba et al., Direct constraints on ultra-light boson mass from searches for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 171101 (2019), arXiv:1909.08854 [astro-ph.HE] .
  16. C. Yuan, Y. Jiang, and Q.-G. Huang, Constraints on an ultralight scalar boson from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs using the stochastic gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023020 (2022), arXiv:2204.03482 [astro-ph.CO] .
  17. D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, and R. A. Porto, Probing Ultralight Bosons with Binary Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 99, 044001 (2019b), arXiv:1804.03208 [gr-qc] .
  18. J. Zhang and H. Yang, Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064018 (2019), arXiv:1808.02905 [gr-qc] .
  19. J. Zhang and H. Yang, Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043020 (2020), arXiv:1907.13582 [gr-qc] .
  20. T. Takahashi and T. Tanaka, Axion clouds may survive the perturbative tidal interaction over the early inspiral phase of black hole binaries, JCAP 10, 031, arXiv:2106.08836 [gr-qc] .
  21. X. Tong, Y. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhu, Termination of superradiance from a binary companion, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043002 (2022), arXiv:2205.10527 [gr-qc] .
  22. Y. Cao and Y. Tang, Signatures of ultralight bosons in compact binary inspiral and outspiral, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123017 (2023), arXiv:2307.05181 [gr-qc] .
  23. A. Guo, J. Zhang, and H. Yang, Superradiant clouds may be relevant for close compact object binaries,   (2024), arXiv:2401.15003 [gr-qc] .
  24. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  25. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc] .
  26. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,   (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM] .
  27. L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  28. J. Antoniadis et al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals,   (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE] .
  29. D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE] .
  30. H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE] .
  31. A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdc91 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE] .
  32. R. A. Konoplya, Massive vector field perturbations in the Schwarzschild background: Stability and unusual quasinormal spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024009 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0509026 .
  33. J. G. Rosa and S. R. Dolan, Massive vector fields on the Schwarzschild spacetime: quasi-normal modes and bound states, Phys. Rev. D 85, 044043 (2012), arXiv:1110.4494 [hep-th] .
  34. S. R. Dolan, Instability of the Proca field on Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104006 (2018), arXiv:1806.01604 [gr-qc] .
  35. E. Babichev and A. Fabbri, Instability of black holes in massive gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 152001 (2013), arXiv:1304.5992 [gr-qc] .
  36. R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Partially massless gravitons do not destroy general relativity black holes, Phys. Rev. D 87, 124024 (2013), arXiv:1306.0908 [gr-qc] .
  37. R. Brito, S. Grillo, and P. Pani, Black Hole Superradiant Instability from Ultralight Spin-2 Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 211101 (2020), arXiv:2002.04055 [gr-qc] .
  38. M. Richartz and A. Saa, Superradiance without event horizons in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044008 (2013), arXiv:1306.3137 [gr-qc] .
  39. V. Cardoso, R. Brito, and J. L. Rosa, Superradiance in stars, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124026 (2015), arXiv:1505.05509 [gr-qc] .
  40. F. V. Day and J. I. McDonald, Axion superradiance in rotating neutron stars, JCAP 10, 051, arXiv:1904.08341 [hep-ph] .
  41. L. K. Wong, Superradiant scattering by a black hole binary, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044051 (2019), arXiv:1905.08543 [hep-th] .
  42. D. C. Ribeiro, M. Zilhão, and V. Cardoso, Binary superradiance: A numerical study, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084004 (2022), arXiv:2201.13407 [gr-qc] .

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel mechanism where gravitational waves stimulate resonant transitions in gravitational atoms formed by Kerr black holes and ultralight boson clouds.
  • It details numerical conditions for efficient stimulated emission, revealing a rapid, exponential amplification of gravitational waves compared to continuous emissions.
  • The study offers testable predictions that could enhance GW observatory strategies to probe ultralight boson dark matter and quantum gravitational phenomena.

Analysis of "Gravitational laser: the stimulated radiation of gravitational waves from the clouds of ultralight bosons"

The paper by Jing Liu presents a striking theoretical investigation into the mechanism of stimulated gravitational wave (GW) radiation within gravitational atoms—comprising Kerr black holes and ultralight boson clouds. Building upon Einstein's predictions of stimulated emissions and gravitational waves, the research elucidates a novel interaction where gravitational wave propagations incite resonant transitions in these gravitational atoms, analogous to electromagnetic stimulated emissions.

The context of this research is grounded in the landscape of ultralight particles, including axions and dark photons, which are potential dark matter candidates. When the Compton wavelengths of these particles approximate the event horizon of black holes, superradiance occurs, extracting angular momentum and energy and forming dense boson clouds. This system, termed a "gravitational atom," mimics a hydrogen atom wherein superradiance facilitates the atom-like structure.

Mechanism of GW Stimulated Transitions

The phenomenon described involves external gravitational waves inducing energy level transitions within these gravitational atoms. When the GW wavenumber is in resonance with the energy difference between the gravitational atom states, a transition is stimulated. This process leads to the efficient radiative emission of GWs, described in the paper as an exponential amplification that completes swiftly relative to the lifetime of the boson cloud. The stimulated GWs are notably strong and directed—attributes that differentiate them from the continuous emissions previously anticipated from ultralight boson clouds.

Critical Numerical Observations

Numerically, the paper provides critical findings on the conditions under which these stimulated transitions are most effective. It determines the alignment of certain quantum numbers and spin states between initial and transition states necessary for resonant mixing caused by GW interaction. Moreover, the authors identify that the physical timescale for this stimulated emission is much shorter than for continuous GW radiation, drawing parallels to superfluorescence phenomena in quantum systems.

Implications and Future Directions

This work extends the potential for gravitational wave detection to a broader spectrum of physical phenomena. Practically, the observational opportunities for detecting these GWs could weigh heavily on the capabilities of current and future GW observatories. The novel signatures predicted—strong, directed GWs—provide new methods for probing the dark sector and understanding the composition and behavior of ultralight boson clouds.

Theoretically, this research invites reconsideration of the GW production models and the fate of boson clouds surrounding astrophysical black holes. Furthermore, by introducing stimulated transitions akin to lasers in electromagnetic theory, it sets the groundwork for predicting other astrophysical phenomena observable with upcoming GW detection technologies.

The research outlines potential broader implications for quantum aspects of gravitation and expands the potential for exploring ultralight boson fields within a greater mass range than previously considered feasible by GW observatories. It further proposes intriguing applications to primordial black hole theories and posits hypotheses on GW phenomena that could contribute to a stochastic GW background.

Conclusion

The paper successfully navigates a complex theoretical landscape, enhancing our understanding of interactions between gravitational waves and ultralight boson clouds. It thoroughly demonstrates the conditions and consequences of stimulated GW radiation, enriching the field of astrophysics with testable predictions that fuse quantum mechanics and general relativity in innovative ways. Future inquiries may consider further elaboration on the impact of astrophysical binary companions in stimulating sample transitions and evaluate the role of diverse ultralight field types in such processes.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 265 likes about this paper.