Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Testing the Exogeneity of Instrumental Variables and Regressors in Linear Regression Models Using Copulas

Published 27 Jan 2024 in stat.ME and econ.EM | (2401.15253v1)

Abstract: We provide a Copula-based approach to test the exogeneity of instrumental variables in linear regression models. We show that the exogeneity of instrumental variables is equivalent to the exogeneity of their standard normal transformations with the same CDF value. Then, we establish a Wald test for the exogeneity of the instrumental variables. We demonstrate the performance of our test using simulation studies. Our simulations show that if the instruments are actually endogenous, our test rejects the exogeneity hypothesis approximately 93% of the time at the 5% significance level. Conversely, when instruments are truly exogenous, it dismisses the exogeneity assumption less than 30% of the time on average for data with 200 observations and less than 2% of the time for data with 1,000 observations. Our results demonstrate our test's effectiveness, offering significant value to applied econometricians.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American statistical Association, 91(434):444–455.
  2. Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4):979–1014.
  3. Ashley, R. (2009). Assessing the credibility of instrumental variables inference with imperfect instruments via sensitivity analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(2):325–337.
  4. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American statistical association, 90(430):443–450.
  5. Caetano, C. (2015). A test of exogeneity without instrumental variables in models with bunching. Econometrica, 83(4):1581–1600.
  6. Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of economic literature, 48(2):424–455.
  7. Probability and Statistics. Pearson, 4 edition.
  8. Dufour, J.-M. (2003). Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 36(4):767–808.
  9. Durbin, J. (1954). Errors in variables. review of the international statistical institute 22: 23–32.
  10. Solving and testing for regressor-error (in) dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence for the effect of education on income. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3:365–392.
  11. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 1029–1054.
  12. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 1251–1271.
  13. Kitagawa, T. (2015). A test for instrument validity. Econometrica, 83(5):2043–2063.
  14. Kiviet, J. F. (2020). Testing the impossible: Identifying exclusion restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 218(2):294–316.
  15. Bayesian and classical approaches to instrumental variable regression. Journal of Econometrics, 114(1):29–72.
  16. Kraay, A. (2012). Instrumental variables regressions with uncertain exclusion restrictions: a bayesian approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(1):108–128.
  17. kinkyreg: Instrument-free inference for linear regression models with endogenous regressors. The Stata Journal, 21(3):772–813.
  18. Identification with imperfect instruments. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3):659–671.
  19. A cautionary note on tests of overidentifying restrictions. Economics Letters, 115(2):314–317.
  20. Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Science, 31(4):567–586.
  21. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Science, 22(3):304–328.
  22. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 393–415.
  23. Sklar, M. (1959). Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. In Annales de l’ISUP, volume 8, pages 229–231.
  24. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
  25. Wu, D.-M. (1973). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 733–750.
  26. Addressing endogeneity using a two-stage copula generated regressor approach. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.