Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Radical Realism

Published 25 Jan 2024 in q-bio.NC | (2401.14049v1)

Abstract: The ontogeny of cognitive neuroscience has emerged within the hegemony of substance ontology. Persistent physicalist influences are described through three developmental hallmarks that yielded epistemic attractors - promoters and perpetuators of material-discursive practices oriented toward reification and self-vindication across the interdisciplinary spectrum which, as a whole, has been driven away from its pretensions to scientific realism. In virtue of a desire for a radical return thereto, we adopt a metaphysic stance akin to pragmatism, and briefly make the case that such concerns have sociopolitical implications extending far beyond the realm of mere philosophical interest.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (90)
  1. Emil du Bois-Reymond. Darwin and copernicus. Nature, 27(702):557–558, 1883-04.
  2. Gabriel Finkelstein. Emil du Bois-Reymond: Neuroscience, Self, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Germany. The MIT Press, 2013.
  3. Albert Einstein. Geometry and experience (1921). Scientiae Studia, 3(4):665–675, 2005.
  4. Michel Foucault. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. Pantheon Books, 1971.
  5. Imre Lakatos. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  6. Ian Hacking. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press, 1983-10-20.
  7. David S. Oderberg. Real Essentialism. Routledge, 2007-11-13.
  8. Anthony Chemero. Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, 17(2):145–150, 2013-06.
  9. Sensorimotor Life. Oxford University Press, 2017-06-22.
  10. Albert Newen. The embodied self, the pattern theory of self, and the predictive mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:2270, 2018-11-23.
  11. David Marr. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. MIT Press, 2010.
  12. Moving from the what to the how and where – bayesian models and predictive processing. In Thomas K. Metzinger and Wanja Wiese, editors, Philosophy and Predictive Processing, chapter 16. MIND Group, 2017.
  13. Hanne Andersen. Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56:1–10, 2016-04.
  14. Appreciating the variety of goals in computational neuroscience. 2020.
  15. Anne Fagot-Largeault. Anthropological physiology: von uexküll, portmann, buytendijk. In A. Berthoz and Yves Christen, editors, Neurobiology of “Umwelt”, pages 1–5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
  16. Mel Andrews. Making reification concrete: A response to bruineberg et al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45:e186, 2022.
  17. Anna Sfard. Reification as the birth of metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14:44–55, 1994.
  18. Enactive metaphorizing in the mathematical experience. Constructivist Foundations, 16(3):265–274, 2021.
  19. Anjan Chakravartty. Reflections on new thinking about scientific realism. Synthese, 194(9):3379–3392, 2017.
  20. Michael Rescorla. A realist perspective on bayesian cognitive science. In Inference and Consciousness. Routledge, 2019.
  21. Is the free-energy principle a formal theory of semantics? from variational density dynamics to neural and phenotypic representations. Entropy, 22(8):889, 2020-08-13.
  22. Minimal physicalism as a scale-free substrate for cognition and consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2021(2):niab013, 2021-05-25.
  23. Penelope Maddy. Second philosophy: a naturalistic method. Oxford University Press, 2007.
  24. Penelope Maddy. Defending the axioms: on the philosophical foundations of set theory. Oxford University Press, 2011.
  25. György Lukács. History and class consciousness: studies in Marxist dialectics. MIT Press, 1971.
  26. Axel Honneth. Reification. Oxford University Press, 2008-01-28.
  27. Michael Pauen. The second-person perspective. Inquiry, 55(1):33–49, 2012-02.
  28. Can there be a science of existential structure and social meaning? In Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone, editors, Bourdieu: critical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  29. Webb Keane. On semiotic ideology. Signs and Society, 6(1):64–87, 2018-01.
  30. Lorraine Daston. Rules: a short history of what we live by. Princeton University Press, 2022.
  31. Metanoia: a speculative ontology of language, thinking, and the brain. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.
  32. Romain Brette. Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42:e215, 2019.
  33. Michel Serfati. De la méthode: recherches en histoire et philosophie des mathématiques. Presses universitaires franc-comtoises, 2002.
  34. Jan Faye. Niels bohr?s experimentalist approach to understanding quantum mechanics. Metascience, 31(2):199–202, 2022.
  35. Wilfrid Sellars. In the space of reasons: selected essays of wilfrid sellars. Harvard University Press, 2007.
  36. Hasok Chang. Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press, 2022-10-13.
  37. Toward a Framework for the Analysis of Scientific Practices. In Lena Soler, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch, and Vincent Israel-Jost, editors, Science After the Practice Turn in Philosophy, History, and the Social Studies of Science, pages 114–122. Routledge, 2014.
  38. Ian Hacking. The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In Andrew Pickering, editor, Science as Practice and Culture, pages 29–64. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
  39. Ian Hacking. Language, truth and reason. In Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, editors, Rationality and Relativism, pages 48–66. MIT Press, 1982.
  40. Ian Hacking. ‘style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 23(1):1–20, 1992-03.
  41. James J. Gibson. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Greenwood Press, 1983.
  42. Angela Potochnik and Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira. Patterns in cognitive phenomena and pluralism of explanatory styles. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4):1306–1320, 2020-10.
  43. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  44. The archaeology of knowledge. Vintage Books, 2010.
  45. Thomas S. Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
  46. Karl R. Popper. The myth of the framework: in defence of science and rationality. Routledge, 1997.
  47. Paul Feyerabend. Philosophical papers. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  48. Claude Lévi-Strauss. Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987.
  49. Ernest Sosa. Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical Studies, 132(1):99–107, 2007-01-19.
  50. Auguste Comte. A general view of positivism: or, summary exposition of the system of thought and life, adapted to the great western republic, formed of the five advanced nations, the French, Italian, Spanish, British, and German, which, since the time of Charlemagne, have always constituted a political whole. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  51. Michael Dummett. What Is a Theory of Meaning? (II), pages 34–93. Oxford University Press, 1996-02-29.
  52. Karen Michelle Barad. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.
  53. G. Harman. Heidegger Explained: From Phenomenon to Thing. Open Court, 2007.
  54. Catherine Malabou. Before tomorrow: epigenesis and rationality. Polity, 2016.
  55. Elizabeth A. Wilson. Neural geographies: feminism and the microstructure of cognition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
  56. Markus Gabriel. Fields of sense: a new realist ontology. Edinburgh University Press, 2015.
  57. Bruno Latour. Why has critique run out of steam? from matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2):225–248, 2004-01.
  58. Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the social sciences and neurosciences. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
  59. Paul Kockelman. The epistemic and performative dynamics of machine learning praxis. Signs and Society, 8(2):319–355, 2020-03.
  60. Judith Halberstam. The queer art of failure. Duke University Press, 2011.
  61. Tim Elmo Feiten. Ethics of the care for the brain: Neuroplasticity with stirner, malabou, and foucault. In Dan Swain, Catherine Malabou, Petr Kouba, and Petr Urban, editors, Unchaining Solidarity: On Mutual Aid and Anarchism with Catherine Malabou. Rowman & Littlefield, 2021.
  62. Victoria Pitts-Taylor. The plastic brain: Neoliberalism and the neuronal self. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 14(6):635–652, 2010-11.
  63. Phenomenology of perception: an introduction. Routledge, 2006.
  64. Donna Jeanne Haraway. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. FAB, Free Association Books, 1998.
  65. The migration machine. In Huub Dijstelbloem and Albert Meijer, editors, Migration and the New Technological Borders of Europe, pages 1–21. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011.
  66. Maurizio Meloni. How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, 62(3):593–614, 2014-08.
  67. Paul B. Preciado. Yo soy el monstruo que os habla: informe para una academia de psicoanalistas. Number 29. Editorial Anagrama, 2020.
  68. Elemental Passions. Routledge, 1992.
  69. J. Butler and P.J. Butler. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "sex". Routledge, 1993.
  70. David R. Gruber. The brain is a blinding light: How neuroscience (re)plays a parody of the solar anus. Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge, (37), 2021-06-01.
  71. H. Arendt and M. Canovan. The Human Condition: Second Edition. University of Chicago Press, 1998.
  72. Quentin Meillassoux. Après la finitude: essai sur la nécessité de la contingence. Éd. du Seuil, 2012.
  73. Mary Douglas. Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge, 2005.
  74. Paul Kockelman. Meeting the universe two-thirds of the way (witchful thinking). Signs and Society, 4(2):215–243, 2016-09.
  75. Ontology of production: three essays. Duke University Press, 2012.
  76. Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties, 4(1):61–77, 2009-03.
  77. Emily Martin. The potentiality of ethnography and the limits of affect theory. Current Anthropology, 54:S149–S158, 2013-10.
  78. The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. The Sociological Review, 61(4):769–789, 2013-11.
  79. Diana Masny. Rhizoanalytic pathways in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5):339–348, 2013-06.
  80. Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks, 23(8):1051–1059, 2010-10.
  81. Clive Cazeaux. Metaphor and Continental Philosophy. Routledge, 2007-09-12.
  82. Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, 2007.
  83. Sheila Jeffreys. Unpacking queer politics: a lesbian feminist perspective. Polity Press in association with Blackwell Pub, 2003.
  84. Janice G. Raymond. A passion for friends: toward a philosophy of female affection. Spinifex Press, 2001.
  85. I. A. Roland-Rodríguez. “can we relinquish the transcendental?” malabou and foucault on the kantian organism. The Comparatist, 44:60–82, 2020.
  86. Jane Bennett. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press, 2010.
  87. Maurizio Ferraris. Introduction to new realism. Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
  88. New materialisms/new colonialisms. Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 2015.
  89. Mark H. Bickhard. The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3):547–591, 2009-02.
  90. Variations in variation and selection: The ubiquity of the variation-and-selective-retention ratchet in emergent organizational complexity. Foundations of Science, 8(3):215–282, 2003.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 6 likes about this paper.