Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Unveiling homophily beyond the pool of opportunities

Published 24 Jan 2024 in physics.soc-ph | (2401.13642v1)

Abstract: Unveiling individuals' preferences for connecting with similar others (choice homophily) beyond the structural factors determining the pool of opportunities, is a challenging task. Here, we introduce a robust methodology for quantifying and inferring choice homophily in a variety of social networks. Our approach employs statistical network ensembles to estimate and standardize homophily measurements. We control for group size imbalances and activity disparities by counting the number of possible network configurations with a given number of inter-group links using combinatorics. This method provides a principled measure of connection preferences and their confidence intervals. Our framework is versatile, suitable for undirected and directed networks, and applicable in scenarios involving multiple groups. To validate our inference method, we test it on synthetic networks and show that it outperforms traditional metrics. Our approach accurately captures the generative homophily used to build the networks, even when we include additional tie-formation mechanisms, such as preferential attachment and triadic closure. Results show that while triadic closure has some influence on the inference, its impact is small in homophilic networks. On the other hand, preferential attachment does not perturb the results of the inference method. We apply our method to real-world networks, demonstrating its effectiveness in unveiling underlying gender homophily. Our method aligns with traditional metrics in networks with balanced populations, but we obtain different results when the group sizes or degrees are imbalanced. This finding highlights the importance of considering structural factors when measuring choice homophily in social networks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (58)
  1. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. \JournalTitleAnnual Review of Sociology 27, 415–444, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 (2001).
  2. Separate and unequal: Residential segregation and black health disparities. \JournalTitleEthnicity & Disease 19, 179–184 (2009).
  3. The segregation of opportunity: Social and financial resources in the educational contexts of lower-and higher-income children, 1990–2014. \JournalTitleDemography 56, 1635–1664 (2019).
  4. Effects of racial segregation on economic productivity in us cities. \JournalTitlearXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03147 (2022).
  5. City population, majority group size, and residential segregation drive implicit racial biases in us cities. \JournalTitleMajority Group Size, and Residential Segregation Drive Implicit Racial Biases in US Cities (January 27, 2023) (2023).
  6. You can’t fix what you don’t look at: Acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. \JournalTitleUrban education 52, 207–235 (2017).
  7. Lee, E. et al. Homophily and minority-group size explain perception biases in social networks. \JournalTitleNature Human Behaviour 3, 1078–1087, DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0677-4 (2019).
  8. Beck, A. F. et al. The color of health: how racism, segregation, and inequality affect the health and well-being of preterm infants and their families. \JournalTitlePediatric research 87, 227–234 (2020).
  9. Sajjadi, S. et al. Structural inequalities exacerbate infection disparities: A computational approach. \JournalTitlearXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04361 (2022).
  10. Social inequalities that matter for contact patterns, vaccination, and the spread of epidemics. \JournalTitlearXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04865 (2023).
  11. Herd immunity and epidemic size in networks with vaccination homophily. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 105, L052301 (2022).
  12. Measuring segregation in social networks. \JournalTitleSocial networks 39, 14–32 (2014).
  13. Homophily: Measures and meaning. \JournalTitleAcademy of Management Annals 14, 513–597 (2020).
  14. Lim, D. et al. Large scale learning on non-homophilous graphs: New benchmarks and strong simple methods. In Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P. & Vaughan, J. W. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021).
  15. Combinatorial characterizations and impossibilities for higher-order homophily. \JournalTitleScience Advances 9, eabq3200 (2023).
  16. Newman, M. E. J. Mixing patterns in networks. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 67, 026126, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126 (2003). cond-mat/0209450.
  17. Mixing patterns and individual differences in networks. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 99, 042306, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.042306 (2019). 1810.01432.
  18. Homophily: Measures and Meaning. \JournalTitleAcademy of Management Annals 14, 513–597, DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0147 (2020).
  19. Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups. \JournalTitleAmerican Sociological Review 52, 370–379, DOI: 10.2307/2095356 (1987).
  20. Feld, S. L. The Focused Organization of Social Ties. \JournalTitleAmerican Journal of Sociology 86, 1015–1035 (1981).
  21. Marsden, P. V. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. Peter M. Blau , Joseph E. Schwartz. \JournalTitleAmerican Journal of Sociology 91, 452–454, DOI: 10.1086/228298 (1985).
  22. Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 8, 11077, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29405-7 (2018).
  23. Avin, C. et al. Homophily and the Glass Ceiling Effect in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS ’15, 41–50, DOI: 10.1145/2688073.2688097 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2015).
  24. Peixoto, T. P. Disentangling Homophily, Community Structure, and Triadic Closure in Networks. \JournalTitlePhysical Review X 12, 011004, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011004 (2022).
  25. Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks. \JournalTitleScience Advances 6, eaax7310 (2020).
  26. Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. \JournalTitleDemography 46, 103–125, DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0045 (2009).
  27. Coleman, J. S. Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods. \JournalTitleHuman Organization 17, 28–36 (1958).
  28. Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape. \JournalTitlePlos one 18, e0283106 (2023).
  29. Marsden, P. V. Homogeneity in confiding relations. \JournalTitleSocial Networks 10, 57–76, DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(88)90010-X (1988).
  30. Goodman, L. A. Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications having Ordered Categories. \JournalTitleJournal of the American Statistical Association 74, 537–552, DOI: 10.2307/2286971 (1979).
  31. Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends. \JournalTitleNature Human Behaviour 2, 284–290, DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0321-8 (2018).
  32. Homophily and individual performance. \JournalTitleOrganization Science 29, 912–930, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2018.1208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1208.
  33. Fischer, C. S. To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city (University of chicago Press, 1982).
  34. Marsden, P. V. Core discussion networks of americans. \JournalTitleAmerican sociological review 122–131 (1987).
  35. Moore, G. Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. \JournalTitleAmerican sociological review 726–735 (1990).
  36. Andersson, M. A. Higher education, bigger networks? differences by family socioeconomic background and network measures. \JournalTitleSocius 4, 2378023118797217 (2018).
  37. Network size and support in old age: Differentials by socio-economic status in childhood and adulthood. \JournalTitleAgeing & Society 23, 625–645 (2003).
  38. Long ties, disruptive life events, and economic prosperity. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2211062120 (2023).
  39. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. \JournalTitleSocial epidemiology 174, 290–319 (2000).
  40. Burt, R. S. The network structure of social capital. \JournalTitleResearch in organizational behavior 22, 345–423 (2000).
  41. Lin, N. A network theory of social capital. \JournalTitleThe handbook of social capital 50, 69 (2008).
  42. Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. \JournalTitleAmerican journal of sociology 94, S95–S120 (1988).
  43. Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. \JournalTitleAmerican Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380 (1973).
  44. Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children. \JournalTitleChild development 709–718 (1975).
  45. Close adult friendships, gender, and the life cycle. \JournalTitleJournal of Social and Personal Relationships 32, 709–736 (2015).
  46. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. \JournalTitleSocial psychology quarterly 123–140 (1988).
  47. Newman, M. Networks: An Introduction, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 (2010).
  48. Peixoto, T. P. Nonparametric bayesian inference of the microcanonical stochastic block model. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 95, 012317 (2017).
  49. Emergence of scaling in random networks. \JournalTitlescience 286, 509–512 (1999).
  50. On the effect of triadic closure on network segregation. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 249–284 (2022).
  51. Triadic closure as a basic generating mechanism of communities in complex networks. \JournalTitlePhysical Review E 90, 042806 (2014).
  52. On the inadequacy of nominal assortativity for assessing homophily in networks. \JournalTitleScientific Reports 13, 21053 (2023).
  53. Ley, M. The dblp computer science bibliography: Evolution, research issues, perspectives. In International symposium on string processing and information retrieval, 1–10 (Springer, 2002).
  54. Gender disparities in science? dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. \JournalTitleAdvances in Complex Systems 21, 1750011 (2018).
  55. Inferring gender from names on the web: A comparative evaluation of gender detection methods. In Proceedings of the 25th International conference companion on World Wide Web, 53–54 (2016).
  56. Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations. \JournalTitleCommunications Physics 5, 243 (2022).
  57. Moody, J. Peer influence groups: identifying dense clusters in large networks. \JournalTitleSocial networks 23, 261–283 (2001).
  58. Ruiz-García, M. et al. Triadic influence as a proxy for compatibility in social relationships. \JournalTitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2215041120 (2023).
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 33 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free