Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Lattice QCD calculation of the $D_s^{*}$ radiative decay with (2+1)-flavor Wilson-clover ensembles

Published 24 Jan 2024 in hep-lat, hep-ex, and hep-ph | (2401.13475v2)

Abstract: We perform a lattice calculation on the radiative decay of $D_s*$ using the (2+1)-flavor Wilson-clover gauge ensembles generated by CLQCD collaboration. A method allowing us to calculate the form factor with zero transfer momentum is proposed and applied to the radiative transition $D_s*\rightarrow D_s\gamma$ and the Dalitz decay $D_s*\rightarrow D_s e+e-$. After a continuum extrapolation using three lattice spacings, we obtain $\Gamma(D_s*\rightarrow D_s \gamma)=0.0549(54)$ keV, where the error is purely statistical. The result is consistent with previous lattice calculations but with a error reduced to only a fifth of the before. The Dalitz decay rate is also calculated for the first time and the ratio with the radiative transition is found to be $R_{ee}=0.624(3)\%$. A total decay width of $D_s*$ can then be determined as 0.0587(54) keV taking into account the experimental branching fraction. Combining with the most recent experimental measurement on the branching fraction of the purely leptonic decay $D_s{+,*}\rightarrow e+\nu_e$, we obtain the quantity $f_{D_s*}|V_{cs}|=(190.5{+55.1}{-41.7{\textrm{stat.}}}\pm 12.6_{\textrm{syst.}})$ MeV, where the stat. is only the statistical error from the experiment, and syst. results from the experimental systematic uncertainty and the lattice statistical error. Our result leads to an improved systematic uncertainty compared to $42.7_{\textrm{syst.}}$ obtained using previous lattice prediction of total decay width $0.070(28)$ keV as the input.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), Y. Aoki et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022), 2111.09849.
  2. Sci. Bull. 68, 1880 (2023), 2109.09381.
  3. Phys. Rev. D 108, 014513 (2023), 2305.06231.
  4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 212002 (2014), 1312.5264.
  5. BESIII, M. Ablikim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 141802 (2023), 2304.12159.
  6. P. F. Bedaque, Phys. Lett. B 593, 82 (2004), nucl-th/0402051.
  7. Phys. Lett. B 595, 408 (2004), hep-lat/0405002.
  8. Phys. Rev. D 101, 051502 (2020), 1911.04064.
  9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 192002 (2020), 2003.09798.
  10. Phys. Rev. D 105, 054518 (2022), 2103.11331.
  11. Chin. Phys. C 46, 053102 (2022), 2111.00768.
  12. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 172002 (2022), 2202.01472.
  13. Phys. Rev. D 106, 074510 (2022), 2206.00879.
  14. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 191901 (2023), 2208.03834.
  15. Y. Meng, Lattice QCD calculation of the invisible decay J/ψ→γ⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐽𝜓𝛾𝜈¯𝜈J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma\nu\bar{\nu}italic_J / italic_ψ → italic_γ italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG, in 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 2023, 2309.15436.
  16. L. Landsberg, Physics Reports 128, 301 (1985).
  17. Z.-C. Hu et al., (2023), 2310.00814.
  18. L. Levkova and C. DeTar, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074504 (2011), 1012.1837.
  19. Particle Date Group, R. L. Workman et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  20. M. Achasov et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2024), 2303.15790.
  21. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005), hep-lat/0409003.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.