Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Nearly critical superfluid: effective field theory and holography

Published 22 Jan 2024 in hep-th | (2401.12294v2)

Abstract: We study a nearly critical superfluid system from two complementary approaches. Within the first approach, we formulate a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory (EFT) for the system when it is located slightly above the critical temperature. . The set of symmetries, particularly the dynamical Kubo-Martin-Schwinger (KMS) symmetry and chemical shift symmetry, strictly constrains the form of EFT action. Within the second approach, using the holographic Schwinger-Keldysh technique, we derive the effective action for a ``microscopic'' holographic superfluid, confirming the EFT construction. A systematic inclusion of non-Gaussianity is one highlight of present study.

Authors (4)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (74)
  1. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, “Theory of dynamic critical phenomena,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 (Jul, 1977) 435–479. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435.
  2. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2023.
  3. U. C. Täuber, Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  4. M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, “Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,” JHEP 09 (2017) 095, arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th].
  5. P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, “Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,” JHEP 09 (2017) 096, arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th].
  6. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “Topological sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics,” JHEP 04 (2016) 039, arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th].
  7. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “Effective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctuations, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow,” JHEP 10 (2018) 194, arXiv:1803.11155 [hep-th].
  8. S. Dubovsky, L. Hui, A. Nicolis, and D. T. Son, “Effective field theory for hydrodynamics: thermodynamics, and the derivative expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 085029, arXiv:1107.0731 [hep-th].
  9. S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, R. A. Porto, and J. Wang, “Dissipation in the effective field theory for hydrodynamics: First order effects,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 105001, arXiv:1211.6461 [hep-th].
  10. S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, “Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 10, (2015) 105031, arXiv:1305.3670 [hep-th].
  11. P. Kovtun, G. D. Moore, and P. Romatschke, “Towards an effective action for relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics,” JHEP 07 (2014) 123, arXiv:1405.3967 [hep-ph].
  12. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes,” JHEP 01 (2016) 184, arXiv:1510.02494 [hep-th].
  13. D. Montenegro and G. Torrieri, “Lagrangian formulation of relativistic Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 6, (2016) 065042, arXiv:1604.05291 [hep-th].
  14. P. Glorioso and H. Liu, “The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity,” arXiv:1612.07705 [hep-th].
  15. P. Gao, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, “Ghostbusters: Unitarity and Causality of Non-equilibrium Effective Field Theories,” JHEP 03 (2020) 040, arXiv:1803.10778 [hep-th].
  16. K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom, “Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace,” JHEP 09 (2018) 127, arXiv:1701.07436 [hep-th].
  17. H. Liu and P. Glorioso, “Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,” PoS TASI2017 (2018) 008, arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th].
  18. M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu, “A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos,” JHEP 10 (2018) 127, arXiv:1801.00010 [hep-th].
  19. X. Chen-Lin, L. V. Delacrétaz, and S. A. Hartnoll, “Theory of diffusive fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 9, (2019) 091602, arXiv:1811.12540 [hep-th].
  20. M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi, and A. Ota, “Effective Lagrangian for Nambu-Goldstone modes in nonequilibrium open systems,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 5, (2021) 056020, arXiv:1907.08609 [hep-th].
  21. A. Jain and P. Kovtun, “Late Time Correlations in Hydrodynamics: Beyond Constitutive Relations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 7, (2022) 071601, arXiv:2009.01356 [hep-th].
  22. M. Baggioli and M. Landry, “Effective Field Theory for Quasicrystals and Phasons Dynamics,” SciPost Phys. 9 no. 5, (2020) 062, arXiv:2008.05339 [hep-th].
  23. M. J. Landry, “Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound,” JHEP 04 (2021) 213, arXiv:2008.11725 [hep-th].
  24. N. Sogabe and Y. Yin, “Off-equilibrium non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point: an effective field theory perspective,” JHEP 03 (2022) 124, arXiv:2111.14667 [nucl-th].
  25. S. Vardhan, S. Grozdanov, S. Leutheusser, and H. Liu, “A new formulation of strong-field magnetohydrodynamics for neutron stars,” arXiv:2207.01636 [astro-ph.HE].
  26. M. J. Landry and H. Liu, “A systematic formulation of chiral anomalous magnetohydrodynamics,” arXiv:2212.09757 [hep-ph].
  27. N. Abbasi, M. Kaminski, and O. Tavakol, “Ultraviolet-regulated theory of non-linear diffusion,” arXiv:2212.11499 [hep-th].
  28. S. Lin, Y. Bu, and C. Lei, “Non-Gaussianity from Nonlinear Effective Field Theory,” arXiv:2301.06703 [hep-th].
  29. A. Donos and P. Kailidis, “Nearly Critical Superluids in Keldysh-Schwinger Formalism,” arXiv:2304.06008 [hep-th].
  30. P. Gao and H. Liu, “An effective field theory for non-maximal quantum chaos,” JHEP 11 (2023) 076, arXiv:2301.05256 [hep-th].
  31. P. Glorioso, X. Huang, J. Guo, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and A. Lucas, “Goldstone bosons and fluctuating hydrodynamics with dipole and momentum conservation,” JHEP 05 (2023) 022, arXiv:2301.02680 [hep-th].
  32. A. Jain and P. Kovtun, “Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for stable and causal relativistic hydrodynamics,” arXiv:2309.00511 [hep-th].
  33. N. Mullins, M. Hippert, L. Gavassino, and J. Noronha, “Relativistic hydrodynamic fluctuations from an effective action: causality, stability, and the information current,” arXiv:2309.00512 [hep-th].
  34. L. V. Delacretaz and R. Mishra, “Nonlinear Response in Diffusive Systems,” arXiv:2304.03236 [cond-mat.str-el].
  35. L. V. Delacretaz, “Bound on Thermalization from Diffusive Fluctuations,” arXiv:2310.16948 [cond-mat.str-el].
  36. X. Huang, J. H. Farrell, A. J. Friedman, I. Zane, P. Glorioso, and A. Lucas, “Generalized time-reversal symmetry and effective theories for nonequilibrium matter,” arXiv:2310.12233 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  37. J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200.
  38. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105–114, arXiv:hep-th/9802109.
  39. E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150.
  40. D. Nickel and D. T. Son, “Deconstructing holographic liquids,” New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 075010, arXiv:1009.3094 [hep-th].
  41. M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography,” JHEP 02 (2016) 124, arXiv:1504.07611 [hep-th].
  42. P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, “A prescription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems,” arXiv:1812.08785 [hep-th].
  43. C. P. Herzog and D. T. Son, “Schwinger-Keldysh propagators from AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 03 (2003) 046, arXiv:hep-th/0212072.
  44. K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Real-time gauge/gravity duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 081601, arXiv:0805.0150 [hep-th].
  45. K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples,” JHEP 05 (2009) 085, arXiv:0812.2909 [hep-th].
  46. J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, “Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories,” JHEP 05 (2019) 188, arXiv:1812.06093 [hep-th].
  47. B. Chakrabarty, J. Chakravarty, S. Chaudhuri, C. Jana, R. Loganayagam, and A. Sivakumar, “Nonlinear Langevin dynamics via holography,” JHEP 01 (2020) 165, arXiv:1906.07762 [hep-th].
  48. Y. Bu, T. Demircik, and M. Lublinsky, “All order effective action for charge diffusion from Schwinger-Keldysh holography,” JHEP 05 (2021) 187, arXiv:2012.08362 [hep-th].
  49. Y. Bu, M. Fujita, and S. Lin, “Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuating holographic superconductor,” JHEP 09 (2021) 168, arXiv:2106.00556 [hep-th].
  50. Y. Bu and B. Zhang, “Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for a relativistic Brownian particle in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 086002, arXiv:2108.10060 [hep-th].
  51. Y. Bu, X. Sun, and B. Zhang, “Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh field theory of SU(2) diffusion,” JHEP 08 (2022) 223, arXiv:2205.00195 [hep-th].
  52. Y. Bu, B. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Nonlinear effective dynamics of a Brownian particle in magnetized plasma,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 8, (2022) 086014, arXiv:2210.02274 [hep-th].
  53. M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and V. Ziogas, “U(1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography,” JHEP 09 (2023) 019, arXiv:2304.14173 [hep-th].
  54. S.-H. Ho, W. Li, F.-L. Lin, and B. Ning, “Quantum Decoherence with Holography,” JHEP 01 (2014) 170, arXiv:1309.5855 [hep-th].
  55. J. K. Ghosh, R. Loganayagam, S. G. Prabhu, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar, and V. Vishal, “Effective field theory of stochastic diffusion from gravity,” JHEP 05 (2021) 130, arXiv:2012.03999 [hep-th].
  56. T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta, “An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography,” JHEP 01 (2022) 145, arXiv:2108.03244 [hep-th].
  57. S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, and N. Poovuttikul, “Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 8, (2019) 086012, arXiv:1810.10016 [hep-th].
  58. C. P. Herzog, “An Analytic Holographic Superconductor,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 126009, arXiv:1003.3278 [hep-th].
  59. J. Chen, S. He, M. Huang, and D. Li, “Critical exponents of finite temperature chiral phase transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD models,” JHEP 01 (2019) 165, arXiv:1810.07019 [hep-ph].
  60. M. Flory, S. Grieninger, and S. Morales-Tejera, “Critical and near-critical relaxation of holographic superfluids,” arXiv:2209.09251 [hep-th].
  61. A. Donos and P. Kailidis, “Nearly critical holographic superfluids,” JHEP 12 (2022) 028, arXiv:2210.06513 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 232 (2023)].
  62. R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li, and Y.-X. Wang, “Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) L121902, arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th].
  63. X. Cao, M. Baggioli, H. Liu, and D. Li, “Pion dynamics in a soft-wall AdS-QCD model,” JHEP 12 (2022) 113, arXiv:2210.09088 [hep-ph].
  64. Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, and Z. Li, “Phase structure and critical phenomena in 2-flavor QCD by holography,” arXiv:2310.13432 [hep-ph].
  65. E. Wang and U. W. Heinz, “A Generalized fluctuation dissipation theorem for nonlinear response functions,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025008, arXiv:hep-th/9809016.
  66. D.-f. Hou, E. Wang, and U. W. Heinz, “n point functions at finite temperature,” J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1861–1868, arXiv:hep-th/9807118.
  67. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, “Building a Holographic Superconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 031601, arXiv:0803.3295 [hep-th].
  68. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, “Holographic Superconductors,” JHEP 12 (2008) 015, arXiv:0810.1563 [hep-th].
  69. L. Yin, D. Hou, and H.-c. Ren, “Ginzburg-Landau theory of a holographic superconductor,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 2, (2015) 026003, arXiv:1311.3847 [hep-th].
  70. C.-Y. Xia, H.-B. Zeng, Y. Tian, C.-M. Chen, and J. Zaanen, “Holographic Abrikosov lattice: Vortex matter from black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 2, (2022) L021901, arXiv:2111.07718 [hep-th].
  71. Y.-K. Yan, S. Lan, Y. Tian, P. Yang, S. Yao, and H. Zhang, “Holographic dissipation prefers the Landau over the Keldysh form,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) L121901, arXiv:2207.02814 [hep-th].
  72. P. Wittmer, C.-M. Schmied, T. Gasenzer, and C. Ewerz, “Vortex Motion Quantifies Strong Dissipation in a Holographic Superfluid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 10, (2021) 101601, arXiv:2011.12968 [hep-th].
  73. W.-C. Yang, C.-Y. Xia, H.-B. Zeng, M. Tsubota, and J. Zaanen, “Motion of a superfluid vortex according to holographic quantum dissipation,” Phys. Rev. B 107 no. 14, (2023) 144511, arXiv:2212.14488 [hep-th].
  74. C.-Y. Xia, H.-B. Zeng, H.-Q. Zhang, Z.-Y. Nie, Y. Tian, and X. Li, “Vortex Lattice in a Rotating Holographic Superfluid,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 6, (2019) 061901, arXiv:1904.10925 [hep-th].
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free