Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Counter-factual carving exponentially improves entangled-state fidelity

Published 21 Jan 2024 in quant-ph and physics.atom-ph | (2401.11407v2)

Abstract: We propose a new method, "counter-factual" carving, that uses the "no-jump" evolution of a probe to generate entangled many-body states of high fidelity. The probe is coupled to a target ensemble of qubits and engineered to exponentially decay at a rate depending on the target collective spin, such that post-selecting on observing no probe decay precisely removes select faster-decaying spin components. When probe and $N$-qubit target interact via a cavity mode of cooperativity $C$, counter-factual carving generates entangled states with infidelities of $e{-C/N}$, an exponential improvement over previous carving schemes. Counter-factual carving can generate complex entangled states for applications in quantum metrology and quantum computing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993).
  2. B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015).
  3. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
  4. R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022312 (2003).
  5. L.-M. Duan, B. Wang, and H. J. Kimble, Robust quantum gates on neutral atoms with cavity-assisted photon scattering, Phys. Rev. A 72, 032333 (2005).
  6. A. S. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Entangling atoms in bad cavities, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022314 (2002).
  7. T. Zhang, Z. Chi, and J. Hu, Entanglement generation via single-qubit rotations in a teared hilbert space (2023), arXiv:2312.04507 .
  8. J. Von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, 1955).
  9. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  10. A. Steinberg, Quantum Measurements: a modern view for quantum optics experimentalists (2014), arXiv:1406.5535.
  11. S. A. Moses et al., A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041052 (2023).
  12. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
  13. H. J. Kimble, Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity qed, Physica Scripta 1998, 127 (1998).
  14. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions (John Wiley and Sons, 1998).
  15. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  16. M. D. Lukin, Modern Atomic and Optical Physics II Lecture Notes (2016).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.