Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey and Comparative Study

Published 19 Jan 2024 in cs.CL and cs.LG | (2401.10825v3)

Abstract: Named Entity Recognition seeks to extract substrings within a text that name real-world objects and to determine their type (for example, whether they refer to persons or organizations). In this survey, we first present an overview of recent popular approaches, including advancements in Transformer-based methods and LLMs that have not had much coverage in other surveys. In addition, we discuss reinforcement learning and graph-based approaches, highlighting their role in enhancing NER performance. Second, we focus on methods designed for datasets with scarce annotations. Third, we evaluate the performance of the main NER implementations on a variety of datasets with differing characteristics (as regards their domain, their size, and their number of classes). We thus provide a deep comparison of algorithms that have never been considered together. Our experiments shed some light on how the characteristics of datasets affect the behavior of the methods we compare.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (180)
  1. Message understanding conference-6: A brief history. In COLING 1996 Volume 1: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1996a.
  2. Improving machine translation quality with automatic named entity recognition. In International EAMT workshop on MT and other language technology tools, Improving MT through other language technology tools, Resource and tools for building MT at EACL, 2003.
  3. Named entity recognition for question answering. In Proceedings of the Australasian language technology workshop 2006, pages 51–58, 2006.
  4. Named entity recognition in query. In SIGIR, pages 267–274, 2009.
  5. Chinese named entity recognition: The state of the art. Neurocomputing, 473:37–53, 2022.
  6. Named entity recognition without gazetteers. In Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1–8, 1999.
  7. Lisa F Rau. Extracting company names from text. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application, pages 29–30, 1991.
  8. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1):3–26, 2007.
  9. Ronan Collobert. Deep learning for efficient discriminative parsing. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 224–232. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011.
  10. Bert for named entity recognition in contemporary and historical german. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on natural language processing, Erlangen, Germany, pages 8–11, 2019a.
  11. Khaled Shaalan. A Survey of Arabic Named Entity Recognition and Classification. Computational Linguistics, 40(2):469–510, 06 2014. ISSN 0891-2017. doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00178. URL https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00178.
  12. A systematic review of named entity recognition in biomedical texts. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 17:103–116, 2011.
  13. Named entity recognition: fallacies, challenges and opportunities. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 35(5):482–489, 2013.
  14. Rahul Sharnagat. Named entity recognition: A literature survey. Center For Indian Language Technology, pages 1–27, 2014.
  15. A survey on deep learning for named entity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(1):50–70, 2020a.
  16. Review of research on named entity recognition. In Artificial Intelligence and Security, pages 256–267, 2022.
  17. Nested named entity recognition: A survey. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 16(6), jul 2022. ISSN 1556-4681. doi:10.1145/3522593. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3522593.
  18. Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 59(9):3692–3702, 2019.
  19. A information retrieval based on question and answering and ner for unstructured information without using sql. Wireless Personal Communications, 108:1909–1931, 2019.
  20. Moo-cmds+ ner: Named entity recognition-based extractive comment-oriented multi-document summarization. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 580–588. Springer, 2023.
  21. Tracking anti-vax social movement using ai-based social media monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 3(4):290–299, 2022.
  22. Admit: Improving ner in automotive domain with domain adversarial training and multi-task learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 225:120007, 2023.
  23. Arabic named entity disambiguation using linked open data. In 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), pages 333–338. IEEE, 2016.
  24. Language model pre-training method in machine translation based on named entity recognition. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 29(07n08):2040021, 2020b.
  25. Casimir George Borkowski. A system for automatic recognition of names of persons in newspaper texts. 1966.
  26. Cascades de transducteurs autour de la reconnaissance des entités nommées. Revue TAL, 52(1):69–96, 2011. URL https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00682805.
  27. Definition, dictionaries and tagger for extended named entity hierarchy. In LREC’04, 2004.
  28. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the web: An experimental study. Artificial Intelligence, 165(1):91–134, 2005a. ISSN 0004-3702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370205000366.
  29. Unsupervised biomedical named entity recognition: Experiments with clinical and biological texts. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(6):1088–1098, 2013. ISSN 1532-0464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.004. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046413001196. Special Section: Social Media Environments.
  30. Prominer: rule-based protein and gene entity recognition. BMC bioinformatics, 6(1):1–9, 2005.
  31. Named entity recognition over electronic health records through a combined dictionary-based approach. Procedia Computer Science, 100:55–61, 2016.
  32. Named entity discovery using comparable news articles. In COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 848–853, Geneva, Switzerland, aug 23–aug 27 2004a. COLING. URL https://aclanthology.org/C04-1122.
  33. Mesure non-supervisée du degré d’appartenance d’une entité à un type. TALN 2011, juin 2011. URL https://www.lirmm.fr/TALN2011/PDF_court/Bonnefoy_taln11_submission_120.pdf.
  34. Named entity discovery using comparable news articles. In COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 848–853, 2004b.
  35. Unsupervised named-entity recognition: Generating gazetteers and resolving ambiguity. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 19th Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Canadian AI 2006, Québec City, Québec, Canada, June 7-9, 2006. Proceedings 19, pages 266–277. Springer, 2006.
  36. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the web: An experimental study. Artificial intelligence, 165(1):91–134, 2005b.
  37. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, 1999. URL https://aclanthology.org/W99-0613.
  38. Self-training and co-training applied to spanish named entity recognition. In Mexican International conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 770–779. Springer, 2005.
  39. A pre-training and self-training approach for biomedical named entity recognition. PloS one, 16(2):e0246310, 2021.
  40. Named entity recognition using hidden markov model (hmm). International Journal on Natural Language Computing (IJNLC) Vol, 1, 2012.
  41. An algorithm that learns what‘s in a name. Mach. Learn., 34(1–3):211–231, feb 1999. ISSN 0885-6125. doi:10.1023/A:1007558221122. URL https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007558221122.
  42. Andrew Eliot Borthwick. A maximum entropy approach to named entity recognition. New York University, 1999.
  43. A maximum entropy approach to biomedical named entity recognition. In International Conference on Data Mining in Bioinformatics, pages 56–61, 2004.
  44. Efficient support vector classifiers for named entity recognition. In COLING 2002: The 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2002.
  45. Tuning support vector machines for biomedical named entity recognition. In ACL-02 workshop on NLP in the biomedical domain, pages 1–8, 2002.
  46. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In HLT-NAACL 2003 - Volume 4, page 188–191, 2003.
  47. Burr Settles. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications (NLPBA/BioNLP), pages 107–110, Geneva, Switzerland, August 28th and 29th 2004a. COLING. URL https://aclanthology.org/W04-1221.
  48. Shaojun Zhao. Named entity recognition in biomedical texts using an hmm model. In Proceedings of the international joint workshop on natural language processing in biomedicine and its applications (NLPBA/BioNLP), pages 87–90, 2004.
  49. Nyu: Description of the mene named entity system as used in muc-7. In Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7): Proceedings of a Conference Held in Fairfax, Virginia, April 29-May 1, 1998, 1998.
  50. Experiments in telugu ner: A conditional random field approach. In Proceedings of the IJCNLP-08 Workshop on Named Entity Recognition for South and South East Asian Languages, 2008.
  51. Burr Settles. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proceedings of the international joint workshop on natural language processing in biomedicine and its applications (NLPBA/BioNLP), pages 107–110, 2004b.
  52. Japanese named entity extraction using support vector machine. 43(1):44–53, 2002.
  53. Chunking with support vector machines. In Second meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2001.
  54. Juan Ramos et al. Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning, volume 242, pages 29–48. Citeseer, 2003.
  55. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In C.J. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26. Curran Associates, Inc., 2013. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/file/9aa42b31882ec039965f3c4923ce901b-Paper.pdf.
  56. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In EMNLP, volume 14, pages 1532–1543, 2014.
  57. Enriching word vectors with subword information. arXiv preprint, 2016.
  58. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018.
  59. Named-entity recognition using automatic construction of training data from social media messaging apps. IEEE Access, 8:222724–222732, 2020.
  60. Wahiba Ben Abdessalem Karaa. Named entity recognition using web document corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1102.5728, 2011.
  61. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12(null):2493–2537, nov 2011. ISSN 1532-4435.
  62. Bidirectional lstm-crf models for sequence tagging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01991, 2015.
  63. End-to-end sequence labeling via bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 1064–1074, 2016.
  64. Neural architectures for named entity recognition. In the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 260–270, 2016.
  65. Sławomir Dadas. Combining neural and knowledge-based approaches to named entity recognition in polish. In Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, pages 39–50, 2019.
  66. Deep contextualized word representations. In Marilyn Walker, Heng Ji, and Amanda Stent, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227–2237, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2018a. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/N18-1202. URL https://aclanthology.org/N18-1202.
  67. Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language models. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1756–1765, Vancouver, Canada, July 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/P17-1161. URL https://aclanthology.org/P17-1161.
  68. Deep contextualized word representations. In Marilyn Walker, Heng Ji, and Amanda Stent, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227–2237, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2018b. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/N18-1202. URL https://aclanthology.org/N18-1202.
  69. An introduction to convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08458, 2015.
  70. Cnn-based chinese ner with lexicon rethinking. In ijcai, volume 2019, 2019.
  71. Learning with rethinking: Recurrently improving convolutional neural networks through feedback. Pattern Recognition, 79:183–194, 2018.
  72. Gram-cnn: a deep learning approach with local context for named entity recognition in biomedical text. Bioinformatics, 34(9):1547–1554, 2018.
  73. Alex Sherstinsky. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 404:132306, mar 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306. URL https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.physd.2019.132306.
  74. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555, 2014.
  75. An investigation of recurrent neural architectures for drug name recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07585, 2016.
  76. Chinese ner using lattice lstm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02023, 2018.
  77. Pointer networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  78. An attention-based bilstm-crf approach to document-level chemical named entity recognition. Bioinformatics, 34(8):1381–1388, 2018.
  79. Reliability-aware dynamic feature composition for name tagging. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pages 165–174, 2019.
  80. End-to-end training of hybrid cnn-crf models for stereo. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2339–2348, 2017.
  81. Study on mri medical image segmentation technology based on cnn-crf model. IEEE Access, 8:60505–60514, 2020.
  82. Named entity recognition by neural sliding window. In 2008 The Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, pages 567–573. IEEE, 2008.
  83. Neural models for sequence chunking. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 31, 2017.
  84. OCDE. Ai language models. (352), 2023. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/13d38f92-en. URL https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/13d38f92-en.
  85. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  86. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  87. Towards robust named entity recognition for historic German. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP, pages 96–103. ACL, 2019. doi:10.18653/v1/W19-4312. URL https://aclanthology.org/W19-4312.
  88. Bert for named entity recognition in contemporary and historic german. In KONVENS, 2019b.
  89. A named entity recognition shootout for German. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 120–125, Melbourne, Australia, July 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/P18-2020. URL https://aclanthology.org/P18-2020.
  90. Tensor-based graph modularity for text data clustering. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 2227–2231, 2022.
  91. Contextual word embeddings clustering through multiway analysis: A comparative study. In International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, pages 1–14. Springer, 2023a.
  92. Is anisotropy truly harmful? a case study on text clustering. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 1194–1203, 2023b.
  93. Unsupervised and self-supervised deep learning approaches for biomedical text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(2):1592–1603, 2021.
  94. A hybrid deep-learning approach for complex biochemical named entity recognition. Knowledge-Based Systems, 221:106958, 2021a.
  95. Tener: adapting transformer encoder for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2019.
  96. Transformer-based named entity recognition for french using adversarial adaptation to similar domain corpora. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03692, 2022.
  97. Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108, 2019.
  98. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint, 2019a.
  99. Macarious Abadeer. Assessment of DistilBERT performance on named entity recognition task for the detection of protected health information and medical concepts. In Proceedings of the 3rd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, pages 158–167, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.clinicalnlp-1.18. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.clinicalnlp-1.18.
  100. Llm-rm at semeval-2023 task 2: Multilingual complex ner using xlm-roberta. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03300, 2023.
  101. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  102. Crosslingual generalization through multitask finetuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01786, 2022.
  103. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  104. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1–67, 2020. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-074.html.
  105. Gpt-ner: Named entity recognition via large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10428, 2023.
  106. Promptner: Prompting for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15444, 2023.
  107. A systematic study and comprehensive evaluation of chatgpt on benchmark datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18486, 2023.
  108. Injecting comparison skills in task-oriented dialogue systems for database search results disambiguation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 4047–4065, 2023.
  109. Entities, dates, and languages: Zero-shot on historical texts with t0. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05211, 2022.
  110. Resolving elliptical compounds in german medical text. In The 22nd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing and BioNLP Shared Tasks, pages 292–305, 2023.
  111. Codeie: Large code generation models are better few-shot information extractors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05711, 2023.
  112. Tabllm: Few-shot classification of tabular data with large language models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 5549–5581. PMLR, 2023.
  113. Leveraging large language models for multiple choice question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12353, 2022.
  114. How good are gpt models at machine translation? a comprehensive evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09210, 2023.
  115. Zero-shot clinical entity recognition using chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16416, 2023.
  116. Publicly available clinical bert embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.03323, 2019.
  117. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  118. Reconstructing complete lemmas for incomplete german compounds. In Language Processing and Knowledge in the Web: 25th International Conference, GSCL 2013, Darmstadt, Germany, September 25-27, 2013. Proceedings, pages 1–13. Springer, 2013.
  119. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021a.
  120. Encoding sentences with graph convolutional networks for semantic role labeling. arXiv preprint, 2017.
  121. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint, 2016.
  122. Understanding convolutions on graphs. Distill, 6(9):e32, 2021.
  123. Graph convolutional networks for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2017.
  124. Ontonotes release 5.0 ldc2013t19. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA, 23, 2013.
  125. Graph convolution for multimodal information extraction from visually rich documents. arXiv preprint, 2019b.
  126. Named entity recognition as graph classification. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2021 Satellite Events: Virtual Event, June 6–10, 2021, Revised Selected Papers 18, pages 103–108. Springer, 2021.
  127. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(1):43–76, 2020.
  128. Transfer learning for image classification. In 2018 second international conference on electronics, communication and aerospace technology (ICECA), pages 656–660. IEEE, 2018.
  129. Transfer learning for speech and language processing. In 2015 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), pages 1225–1237. IEEE, 2015.
  130. Transfer learning for time series classification. In international conference on big data (Big Data), pages 1367–1376, 2018.
  131. Transfer learning for named-entity recognition with neural networks. arXiv preprint, 2017.
  132. Transfer learning for named entity recognition in financial and biomedical documents. Information, 10(8):248, 2019.
  133. Ner-bert: A pre-trained model for low-resource entity tagging. arXiv preprint, 2021b.
  134. Negation-based transfer learning for improving biomedical named entity recognition and relation extraction. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, page 104279, 2023.
  135. An analysis of simple data augmentation for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2020.
  136. Sentence augmentation for language translation using gpt-2. Electronics, 10(24):3082, 2021.
  137. A review: preprocessing techniques and data augmentation for sentiment analysis. Computational Social Networks, 8(1):1–16, 2021.
  138. Systematic review of effect of data augmentation using paraphrasing on named entity recognition. In NeurIPS 2022 Workshop on Synthetic Data for Empowering ML Research.
  139. Data augmentation process to improve deep learning-based ner task in the automotive industry field. In IJCNN, pages 1–8, 2020.
  140. Aeda: An easier data augmentation technique for text classification. arXiv preprint, 2021.
  141. Gpt3mix: Leveraging large-scale language models for text augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08826, 2021.
  142. Burr Settles. Active learning literature survey. 2009.
  143. Deep bayesian active learning for natural language processing: Results of a large-scale empirical study. arXiv preprint, 2018.
  144. Deep active learning for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2017.
  145. A deep active learning-based and crowdsourcing-assisted solution for named entity recognition in chinese historical corpora. Aslib Journal of Information Management, (ahead-of-print), 2022.
  146. Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning. ACM computing surveys (csur), 53(3):1–34, 2020.
  147. Few-shot classification in named entity recognition task. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 993–1000, 2019.
  148. Few-shot slot tagging with collapsed dependency transfer and label-enhanced task-adaptive projection network. arXiv preprint, 2020.
  149. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  150. Yi Yang and Arzoo Katiyar. Simple and effective few-shot named entity recognition with structured nearest neighbor learning. arXiv preprint, 2020.
  151. Template-based named entity recognition using bart. arXiv preprint, 2021.
  152. Few-shot learning for named entity recognition in medical text. arXiv preprint, 2018.
  153. Few-shot named entity recognition: A comprehensive study. arXiv preprint, 2020.
  154. Zero-data learning of new tasks. In AAAI, volume 1, page 3, 2008.
  155. Attribute-based classification for zero-shot visual object categorization. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 36(3):453–465, 2013.
  156. Low-rank embedded ensemble semantic dictionary for zero-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2050–2058, 2017.
  157. Scalable zero-shot entity linking with dense entity retrieval. arXiv preprint, 2019.
  158. Description-based zero-shot fine-grained entity typing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 807–814, 2019.
  159. Leveraging type descriptions for zero-shot named entity recognition and classification. In ACL, pages 1516–1528, 2021.
  160. Zero-shot learning in named-entity recognition with external knowledge. arXiv preprint, 2021.
  161. Crop: Zero-shot cross-lingual named entity recognition with multilingual labeled sequence translation. arXiv preprint, 2022.
  162. OpenAI. Openai: Ai tools and models. https://www.openai.com, 2024. Accessed: 2024-01-04.
  163. spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing. 2017.
  164. Steven Bird. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions, pages 69–72, 2006.
  165. The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In ACL, pages 55–60, 2014.
  166. Ted Kwartler. The OpenNLP Project, pages 237–269. 05 2017. ISBN 9781119282013. doi:10.1002/9781119282105.ch8.
  167. Polyglot-ner: Massive multilingual named entity recognition. In SIAM, SDM, pages 586–594. SIAM, 2015.
  168. Flair: An easy-to-use framework for state-of-the-art nlp. In Conference of the North American chapter of ACL, pages 54–59, 2019.
  169. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In EMNLP, pages 38–45, 2020.
  170. Hamish Cunningham. Gate: A framework and graphical development environment for robust nlp tools and applications. In ACL, pages 168–175, 2002.
  171. T-ner: an all-round python library for transformer-based named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2022.
  172. The impact of using different annotation schemes on named entity recognition. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(3):295–302, 2021.
  173. A novel named entity recognition scheme for steel e-commerce platforms using a lite bert. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 129(1), 2021b.
  174. Message Understanding Conference- 6: A brief history. In COLING 1996 Volume 1: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1996b. URL https://aclanthology.org/C96-1079.
  175. The automatic content extraction (ACE) program – tasks, data, and evaluation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04), Lisbon, Portugal, May 2004. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). URL http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/5.pdf.
  176. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. arXiv preprint, 2003.
  177. Interpretable multi-dataset evaluation for named entity recognition. In EMNLP, pages 6058–6069, November 2020.
  178. Domain adaption of named entity recognition to support credit risk assessment. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2015, pages 84–90, 2015.
  179. Milton Friedman. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(1):86–92, 1940.
  180. Peter Bjorn Nemenyi. Distribution-free multiple comparisons. Princeton University, 1963.
Citations (7)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free