Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Estimation of Hamiltonian parameters from thermal states

Published 18 Jan 2024 in quant-ph | (2401.10343v1)

Abstract: We upper- and lower-bound the optimal precision with which one can estimate an unknown Hamiltonian parameter via measurements of Gibbs thermal states with a known temperature. The bounds depend on the uncertainty in the Hamiltonian term that contains the parameter and on the term's degree of noncommutativity with the full Hamiltonian: higher uncertainty and commuting operators lead to better precision. We apply the bounds to show that there exist entangled thermal states such that the parameter can be estimated with an error that decreases faster than 1/n1/\sqrt{n}, beating the standard quantum limit. This result governs Hamiltonians where an unknown scalar parameter (e.g. a component of a magnetic field) is coupled locally and identically to nn qubit sensors. In the high-temperature regime, our bounds allow for pinpointing the optimal estimation error, up to a constant prefactor. Our bounds generalize to joint estimations of multiple parameters. In this setting, we recover the high-temperature sample scaling derived previously via techniques based on quantum state discrimination and coding theory. In an application, we show that noncommuting conserved quantities hinder the estimation of chemical potentials.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  2. M. G. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 7, 125 (2009).
  3. M. G. A. Paris, Achieving the Landau bound to precision of quantum thermometry in systems with vanishing gap, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 03LT02 (2015).
  4. K. V. Hovhannisyan and L. A. Correa, Measuring the temperature of cold many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 98, 045101 (2018).
  5. H. J. Miller and J. Anders, Energy-temperature uncertainty relation in quantum thermodynamics, Nat. Commun. 9, 2203 (2018).
  6. P. P. Potts, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Fundamental limits on low-temperature quantum thermometry with finite resolution, Quantum 3, 161 (2019).
  7. P. Zanardi, L. Campos Venuti, and P. Giorda, Bures metric over thermal state manifolds and quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062318 (2007).
  8. P. Zanardi, M. G. A. Paris, and L. Campos Venuti, Quantum criticality as a resource for quantum estimation, Phys. Rev. A 78, 042105 (2008).
  9. J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a single eigenstate encode the full Hamiltonian?, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021026 (2018).
  10. M. Greiter, V. Schnells, and R. Thomale, Method to identify parent Hamiltonians for trial states, Phys. Rev. B 98, 081113 (2018).
  11. E. Chertkov and B. K. Clark, Computational inverse method for constructing spaces of quantum models from wave functions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031029 (2018).
  12. W. Zhu, Z. Huang, and Y.-C. He, Reconstructing entanglement Hamiltonian via entanglement eigenstates, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235109 (2019).
  13. X.-L. Qi and D. Ranard, Determining a local Hamiltonian from a single eigenstate, Quantum 3, 159 (2019).
  14. E. Bairey, I. Arad, and N. H. Lindner, Learning a local Hamiltonian from local measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020504 (2019).
  15. J. Zhou and D. L. Zhou, Recovery of a generic local Hamiltonian from a steady state, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012615 (2022).
  16. K. Rudinger and R. Joynt, Compressed sensing for Hamiltonian reconstruction, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052322 (2015).
  17. J. Haah, R. Kothari, and E. Tang, Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs states, in 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE, 2022) pp. 135–146.
  18. A. Gu, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Practical black box Hamiltonian learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15464 10.48550/arXiv.2206.15464 (2022).
  19. E. P. Wigner and M. M. Yanase, Information contents of distributions, PNAS 49, 910 (1963).
  20. S. Luo, Quantum versus classical uncertainty, Theor. Math. Phys. 143, 681 (2005).
  21. S. Luo, Wigner-Yanase skew information and uncertainty relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 180403 (2003).
  22. J. S. Sidhu and P. Kok, Geometric perspective on quantum parameter estimation, AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 014701 (2020).
  23. I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nat. Commun. 5, 3821 (2014).
  24. D. Girolami, Observable measure of quantum coherence in finite dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 170401 (2014).
  25. D. P. Pires, L. C. Céleri, and D. O. Soares-Pinto, Geometric lower bound for a quantum coherence measure, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042330 (2015).
  26. Z. Gong and R. Hamazaki, Bounds in nonequilibrium quantum dynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2230007 (2022).
  27. A. M. Alhambra, Quantum many-body systems in thermal equilibrium, PRX Quantum 4, 040201 (2023).
  28. N. Kura and M. Ueda, Standard quantum limit and Heisenberg limit in function estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010507 (2020).
  29. I. Frérot and T. Roscilde, Quantum critical metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 020402 (2018).
  30. M. Gabbrielli, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezzè, Multipartite entanglement at finite temperature, Sci. Rep. 8, 15663 (2018).
  31. L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2016 (6), 064007.
  32. T. Monnai, Relaxation to generalized Gibbs ensembles in quadratic quantum open systems, JPSJ 89, 124005 (2020).
  33. G. Manzano, J. M. Parrondo, and G. T. Landi, Non-abelian quantum transport and thermosqueezing effects, PRX Quantum 3, 010304 (2022).
  34. C. Yin and A. Lucas, Heisenberg-limited metrology with perturbing interactions (2023), arXiv:2308.10929 [quant-ph] .
  35. M. Yu, H. C. Nguyen, and S. Nimmrichter, Criticality-enhanced precision in phase thermometry (2023a), arXiv:2311.14578 [quant-ph] .
  36. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
Citations (8)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 41 likes about this paper.