Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Classification of same-gate quantum circuits and their space-time symmetries with application to the level-spacing distribution

Published 18 Jan 2024 in quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, and nlin.CD | (2401.09708v2)

Abstract: We study Floquet systems with translationally invariant nearest-neighbor 2-site gates. Depending on the order in which the gates are applied on an N-site system with periodic boundary conditions, there are factorially many different circuit configurations. We prove that there are only N-1 different spectrally equivalent classes which can be viewed either as a generalization of the brick-wall or of the staircase configuration. Every class, characterized by two integers, has a nontrivial space-time symmetry with important implications for the level-spacing distribution -- a standard indicator of quantum chaos. Namely, in order to study chaoticity one should not look at eigenphases of the Floquet propagator itself, but rather at the spectrum of an appropriate root of the propagator.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
  2. F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  3. T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. E 60, 3949 (1999).
  4. U. Schollwöck, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011).
  5. V. Gritsev and A. Polkovnikov, SciPost Phys. 2, 021 (2017).
  6. S. Gopalakrishnan and A. Lamacraft, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064309 (2019).
  7. T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031066 (2020).
  8. M. Žnidarič, J. Phys. A 56, 434001 (2023).
  9. For many-body quantum systems a word of caution is in place. Because the level spacing is exponentially small in N𝑁Nitalic_N the LSD probes “chaoticity” on an exponentially large timescale. There can be situations where the relevant physics is not chaotic at all despite the RMT LSD, see e.g. Ref. Santos (2004); Brenes et al. (2018).
  10. M. L. Mehta, Random matrices, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004).
  11. U. Duh, “Space-time symmetries in chaotic qubit circuits,” Master’s thesis, University of Ljubljana (2023).
  12. S. Xu and C. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 096401 (2018).
  13. Y. Peng and G. Refael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016806 (2019).
  14. Single-site Hilbert space can have any dimension (qudits) although we will frequently speak about qubits because all our numerical examples will be of that kind.
  15. J. Bensa and M. Žnidarič, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031019 (2021).
  16. E. M. Rains, Probab. Theory & Relat. Fields 125, 522 (2003).
  17. N. Rosenzweig and C. E. Porter, Phys. Rev. 120, 1698 (1960).
  18. Provided the eigenphases ϕ~jsubscript~italic-ϕ𝑗\tilde{\phi}_{j}over~ start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of M𝑀Mitalic_M are incommensurate with 2⁢π2𝜋2\pi2 italic_π this will always hold for large q𝑞qitalic_q regardless of the properties of M𝑀Mitalic_M because the map ϕj=q⋅ϕ~j⁢(mod⁢ 2⁢π)subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗⋅𝑞subscript~italic-ϕ𝑗mod2𝜋\phi_{j}=q\cdot\tilde{\phi}_{j}\,({\rm mod}\,2\pi)italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_q ⋅ over~ start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_mod 2 italic_π ) is ergodic and will destroy any correlations in ϕ~jsubscript~italic-ϕ𝑗\tilde{\phi}_{j}over~ start_ARG italic_ϕ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.
  19. For small N𝑁Nitalic_N one of course has non-negligible finite-size deviations from RMT distributions; we have checked that they are within expectations Prosen and Robnik (1993).
  20. L. F. Santos, J. Phys. A: Math. & Gen. 37, 4723 (2004).
  21. T. Prosen and M. Robnik, J. Phys. A: Math. & Gen. 26, 2371 (1993).
  22. B. Dietz and F. Haake, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter 80, 153 (1990).
  23. K. H. Rosen, Elementary number theory and its applications (Addison-Wesley Boston, Boston, 2011).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.