Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Towards a Quality Indicator for Research Data publications and Research Software publications -- A vision from the Helmholtz Association

Published 16 Jan 2024 in cs.DL and cs.CY | (2401.08804v2)

Abstract: Research data and software are widely accepted as an outcome of scientific work. However, in comparison to text-based publications, there is not yet an established process to assess and evaluate quality of research data and research software publications. This paper presents an attempt to fill this gap. Initiated by the Working Group Open Science of the Helmholtz Association the Task Group Helmholtz Quality Indicators for Data and Software Publications currently develops a quality indicator for research data and research software publications to be used within the Association. This report summarizes the vision of the group of what all contributes to such an indicator. The proposed approach relies on generic well-established concepts for quality criteria, such as the FAIR Principles and the COBIT Maturity Model. It does - on purpose - not limit itself to technical implementation possibilities to avoid using an existing metric for a new purpose. The intention of this paper is to share the current state for further discussion with all stakeholders, particularly with other groups also working on similar metrics but also with entities that use the metrics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). EOSC Glossary; 2023. Available from: https://eosc-portal.eu/about/glossary.
  2. Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion; 2021. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.5504016 Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5504016.
  3. Software Engineering Guidelines - From Theory To Practice. RSE Conference 2018. 2018; doi:10.5281/ZENODO.1411431 Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1411431.
  4. Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2011;6(2):4–37. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205 Available from: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.205.
  5. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data. 2016;3(1). doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
  6. De Haes S, Van Grembergen W. In: COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT. Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 103–128.
  7. American Society for Quality (ASQ). What Is a Quality Management System (QMS)?; 2023. Available from: https://asq.org/quality-resources/quality-management-system.
  8. Research Data Alliance FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group. FAIR Data Maturity Model: specification and guidelines. RDA Endorsed Recommendation. 2020; doi:10.15497/RDA00050 Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/RDA00050.
  9. FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). RDA Endorsed Recommendation. 2021; doi:10.15497/RDA00065. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 7 likes about this paper.