Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of $R(D^{*})$ using hadronic $B$ tagging at the Belle II experiment

Published 5 Jan 2024 in hep-ex | (2401.02840v1)

Abstract: The ratio of branching fractions $R(D{*}) = \mathcal{B}(\overline{B} \rightarrow D{*} \tau{-} \overline{\nu}{\tau})$/$\mathcal{B} (\overline{B} \rightarrow D{*} \ell{-} \overline{\nu}{\ell})$, where $\ell$ is an electron or muon, is measured using a Belle~II data sample with an integrated luminosity of $189~\mathrm{fb}{-1}$ at the SuperKEKB asymmetric-energy $e{+} e{-}$ collider. Data is collected at the $\Upsilon(\mathrm{4S})$ resonance, and one $B$ meson in the $\Upsilon(\mathrm{4S})\rightarrow B\overline{B}$ decay is fully reconstructed in hadronic decay modes. The accompanying signal $B$ meson is reconstructed as $\overline{B}\rightarrow D{*} \tau{-}\overline{\nu}_{\tau}$ using leptonic $\tau$ decays. The normalization decay, $\overline{B}\rightarrow D{*} \ell{-} \overline{\nu}{\ell}$, where $\ell$ is an electron or muon, produces the same observable final state particles. The ratio of branching fractions is extracted in a simultaneous fit to two signal-discriminating variables in both channels and yields $R(D{*}) = 0.262~{-0.039}{+0.041}(\mathrm{stat})~_{-0.032}{+0.035}(\mathrm{syst})$. This result is consistent with the current world average and with standard model predictions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Charge-conjugate modes are implied throughout the paper.
  2. Y. S. Amhis et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023), https://hflav.web.cern.ch/, arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex].
  3. F. Abe et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3398 (1992).
  4. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Nature Phys. 17, 813 (2021), arXiv:2007.14040 [hep-ex].
  5. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072008 (2022), arXiv:2201.07861 [hep-ex].
  6. D. London and J. Matias, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 37 (2022), arXiv:2110.13270 [hep-ph].
  7. J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012), arXiv:1205.5442 [hep-ex].
  8. J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 072012 (2013), arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex].
  9. M. Huschle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 072014 (2015), arXiv:1507.03233 [hep-ex].
  10. G. Caria et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 161803 (2020), arXiv:1910.05864 [hep-ex].
  11. S. Hirose et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 012004 (2018), arXiv:1709.00129 [hep-ex].
  12. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 072013 (2018), arXiv:1711.02505 [hep-ex].
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 115, 159901 (2015)], arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex].
  14. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191802 (2022), arXiv:2110.09501 [hep-ex].
  15. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111802 (2023a), arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex].
  16. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012018 (2023b), arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex].
  17. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II),   (2023), arXiv:2311.07248 [hep-ex].
  18. T. Abe et al. (Belle II Collaboration),   (2010), arXiv:1011.0352 [physics.ins-det].
  19. T. Aushev et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 789, 134 (2015), arXiv:1406.3267 [physics.ins-det].
  20. D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462, 152 (2001).
  21. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003).
  22. Belle II Collaboration, Belle II Analysis Software Framework (basf2), Zenodo  (2022), 10.5281/zenodo.6949466.
  23. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  24. D. Liventsev et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 77, 091503 (2008), arXiv:0711.3252 [hep-ex].
  25. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 261802 (2008a), arXiv:0808.0528 [hep-ex].
  26. J. Abdallah et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 45, 35 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0510024.
  27. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 092001 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 85, 039904 (2012)], arXiv:1109.6831 [hep-ex].
  28. J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041801 (2016), arXiv:1507.08303 [hep-ex].
  29. F. U. Bernlochner and Z. Ligeti, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014022 (2017), arXiv:1606.09300 [hep-ph].
  30. G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1581 (1978).
  31. T. Keck et al., Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019), arXiv:1807.08680 [hep-ex].
  32. F. Abudinén et al. (Belle II Collaboration),   (2020), arXiv:2008.06096 [hep-ex].
  33. S. Longo et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 982, 164562 (2020), arXiv:2007.09642 [physics.ins-det].
  34. F. Zernike, Physica 1, 689 (1934).
  35. V. Lakshminarayanan and A. Fleck, Journal of Modern Optics 58, 545 (2011).
  36. T. Keck, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 1, 2 (2017).
  37. J. F. Krohn et al. (Belle II Analysis Software Group), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 976, 164269 (2020), arXiv:1901.11198 [hep-ex].
  38. S. Choudhury et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, L031102 (2023), arXiv:2207.01194 [hep-ex].
  39. K. S. Cranmer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 136, 198 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0011057.
  40. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 77, 011102 (2008b), arXiv:0708.1565 [hep-ex].
Citations (20)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.