Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Robustness of the Galactic Center Excess Morphology Against Masking

Published 4 Jan 2024 in astro-ph.HE, astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, and hep-ph | (2401.02481v2)

Abstract: The Galactic Center Excess (GCE) remains an enduring mystery, with leading explanations being annihilating dark matter or an unresolved population of millisecond pulsars. Analyzing the morphology of the GCE provides critical clues to identify its exact origin. We investigate the robustness of the inferred GCE morphology against the effects of masking, an important step in the analysis where the gamma-ray emission from point sources and the galactic disk are excluded. Using different masks constructed from Fermi point source catalogs and a wavelet method, we find that the GCE morphology, particularly its ellipticity and cuspiness, is relatively independent of the choice of mask for energies above 2-3 GeV. The GCE morphology systematically favors an approximately spherical shape, as expected for dark matter annihilation. Compared to various stellar bulge profiles, a spherical dark matter annihilation profile better fits the data across different masks and galactic diffuse emission backgrounds, except for the stellar bulge profile from Coleman et al. (2020), which provides a similar fit to the data. Modeling the GCE with two components, one from dark matter annihilation and one tracing the Coleman Bulge, we find this two-component model outperforms any single component or combinations of dark matter annihilation and other stellar bulge profiles. Uncertainty remains about the exact fraction contributed by each component across different background models and masks. However, when the Coleman Bulge dominates, its corresponding spectrum lacks characteristics typically associated with millisecond pulsars, suggesting that it mostly models the emission from other sources instead of the GCE that is still present and spherically symmetric.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (53)
  1. Lisa Goodenough and Dan Hooper, “Possible Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation In The Inner Milky Way From The Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,”   (2009), arXiv:0910.2998 [hep-ph] .
  2. Dan Hooper and Lisa Goodenough, “Dark Matter Annihilation in The Galactic Center As Seen by the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope,” Phys. Lett. B697, 412–428 (2011), arXiv:1010.2752 [hep-ph] .
  3. Vincenzo Vitale and Aldo Morselli, “Indirect Search for Dark Matter from the center of the Milky Way with the Fermi-Large Area Telescope,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:0912.3828 (2009), arXiv:0912.3828 [astro-ph.HE] .
  4. Kevork N. Abazajian, “The Consistency of Fermi-LAT Observations of the Galactic Center with a Millisecond Pulsar Population in the Central Stellar Cluster,” JCAP 1103, 010 (2011), arXiv:1011.4275 [astro-ph.HE] .
  5. Dan Hooper and Tim Linden, “On The Origin Of The Gamma Rays From The Galactic Center,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 123005 (2011), arXiv:1110.0006 [astro-ph.HE] .
  6. Dan Hooper and Tracy R. Slatyer, “Two Emission Mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A Possible Signal of Annihilating Dark Matter,” Phys. Dark Univ. 2, 118–138 (2013), arXiv:1302.6589 [astro-ph.HE] .
  7. Chris Gordon and Oscar Macias, “Dark Matter and Pulsar Model Constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT Gamma Ray Observations,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 083521 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 049901 (2014)], arXiv:1306.5725 [astro-ph.HE] .
  8. Kevork N. Abazajian, Nicolas Canac, Shunsaku Horiuchi,  and Manoj Kaplinghat, “Astrophysical and Dark Matter Interpretations of Extended Gamma-Ray Emission from the Galactic Center,” Phys. Rev. D90, 023526 (2014), arXiv:1402.4090 [astro-ph.HE] .
  9. Tansu Daylan, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Dan Hooper, Tim Linden, Stephen K. N. Portillo, Nicholas L. Rodd,  and Tracy R. Slatyer, “The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter,” Phys. Dark Univ. 12, 1–23 (2016), arXiv:1402.6703 [astro-ph.HE] .
  10. Francesca Calore, Ilias Cholis,  and Christoph Weniger, “Background Model Systematics for the Fermi GeV Excess,” JCAP 1503, 038 (2015a), arXiv:1409.0042 [astro-ph.CO] .
  11. M. Ajello et al. (Fermi-LAT), “Fermi-LAT Observations of High-Energy γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-Ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center,” Astrophys. J. 819, 44 (2016), arXiv:1511.02938 [astro-ph.HE] .
  12. Tim Linden, Nicholas L. Rodd, Benjamin R. Safdi,  and Tracy R. Slatyer, “High-energy tail of the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 103013 (2016), arXiv:1604.01026 [astro-ph.HE] .
  13. Ilias Cholis, Yi-Ming Zhong, Samuel D. McDermott,  and Joseph P. Surdutovich, “Return of the templates: Revisiting the Galactic Center excess with multimessenger observations,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 103023 (2022), arXiv:2112.09706 [astro-ph.HE] .
  14. Francesca Calore, Ilias Cholis, Christopher McCabe,  and Christoph Weniger, “A Tale of Tails: Dark Matter Interpretations of the Fermi GeV Excess in Light of Background Model Systematics,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 063003 (2015b), arXiv:1411.4647 [hep-ph] .
  15. Prateek Agrawal, Brian Batell, Patrick J. Fox,  and Roni Harnik, “WIMPs at the Galactic Center,” JCAP 05, 011 (2015), arXiv:1411.2592 [hep-ph] .
  16. Asher Berlin, Stefania Gori, Tongyan Lin,  and Lian-Tao Wang, “Pseudoscalar Portal Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 015005 (2015), arXiv:1502.06000 [hep-ph] .
  17. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT), “The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter,” Astrophys. J. 840, 43 (2017), arXiv:1704.03910 [astro-ph.HE] .
  18. Rebecca K. Leane and Tracy R. Slatyer, “Revival of the Dark Matter Hypothesis for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241101 (2019), arXiv:1904.08430 [astro-ph.HE] .
  19. Kevork N. Abazajian and Manoj Kaplinghat, “Detection of a Gamma-Ray Source in the Galactic Center Consistent with Extended Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation and Concentrated Astrophysical Emission,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 083511 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 129902 (2013)], arXiv:1207.6047 [astro-ph.HE] .
  20. Dan Hooper, Ilias Cholis, Tim Linden, Jennifer Siegal-Gaskins,  and Tracy Slatyer, “Pulsars Cannot Account for the Inner Galaxy’s GeV Excess,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 083009 (2013), arXiv:1305.0830 [astro-ph.HE] .
  21. Samuel K. Lee, Mariangela Lisanti, Benjamin R. Safdi, Tracy R. Slatyer,  and Wei Xue, “Evidence for Unresolved γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-Ray Point Sources in the Inner Galaxy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051103 (2016), arXiv:1506.05124 [astro-ph.HE] .
  22. Jovana Petrović, Pasquale D. Serpico,  and Gabrijela Zaharijas, “Millisecond pulsars and the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess: the importance of luminosity function and secondary emission,” JCAP 02, 023 (2015), arXiv:1411.2980 [astro-ph.HE] .
  23. Ilias Cholis, Dan Hooper,  and Tim Linden, “Challenges in Explaining the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess with Millisecond Pulsars,” JCAP 06, 043 (2015a), arXiv:1407.5625 [astro-ph.HE] .
  24. Richard Bartels, Emma Storm, Christoph Weniger,  and Francesca Calore, “The Fermi-LAT GeV excess as a tracer of stellar mass in the Galactic bulge,” Nature Astron. 2, 819–828 (2018), arXiv:1711.04778 [astro-ph.HE] .
  25. Malte Buschmann, Nicholas L. Rodd, Benjamin R. Safdi, Laura J. Chang, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, Mariangela Lisanti,  and Oscar Macias, “Foreground Mismodeling and the Point Source Explanation of the Fermi Galactic Center Excess,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 023023 (2020), arXiv:2002.12373 [astro-ph.HE] .
  26. Anuj Gautam, Roland M. Crocker, Lilia Ferrario, Ashley J. Ruiter, Harrison Ploeg, Chris Gordon,  and Oscar Macias, “Millisecond pulsars from accretion-induced collapse as the origin of the Galactic Centre gamma-ray excess signal,” Nature Astron. 6, 703–707 (2022), arXiv:2106.00222 [astro-ph.HE] .
  27. Jovana Petrović, Pasquale Dario Serpico,  and Gabrijela Zaharijaš, “Galactic Center gamma-ray ”excess” from an active past of the Galactic Centre?” JCAP 10, 052 (2014), arXiv:1405.7928 [astro-ph.HE] .
  28. Eric Carlson and Stefano Profumo, ‘‘Cosmic Ray Protons in the Inner Galaxy and the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 023015 (2014), arXiv:1405.7685 [astro-ph.HE] .
  29. Ilias Cholis, Carmelo Evoli, Francesca Calore, Tim Linden, Christoph Weniger,  and Dan Hooper, “The Galactic Center GeV Excess from a Series of Leptonic Cosmic-Ray Outbursts,” JCAP 12, 005 (2015b), arXiv:1506.05119 [astro-ph.HE] .
  30. Yi-Ming Zhong, Samuel D. McDermott, Ilias Cholis,  and Patrick J. Fox, “Testing the Sensitivity of the Galactic Center Excess to the Point Source Mask,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 231103 (2020), arXiv:1911.12369 [astro-ph.HE] .
  31. Richard Bartels, Suraj Krishnamurthy,  and Christoph Weniger, “Strong support for the millisecond pulsar origin of the Galactic center GeV excess,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 051102 (2016), arXiv:1506.05104 [astro-ph.HE] .
  32. Oscar Macias, Chris Gordon, Roland M. Crocker, Brendan Coleman, Dylan Paterson, Shunsaku Horiuchi,  and Martin Pohl, “Galactic bulge preferred over dark matter for the Galactic centre gamma-ray excess,” Nature Astron. 2, 387–392 (2018), arXiv:1611.06644 [astro-ph.HE] .
  33. Oscar Macias, Shunsaku Horiuchi, Manoj Kaplinghat, Chris Gordon, Roland M. Crocker,  and David M. Nataf, “Strong Evidence that the Galactic Bulge is Shining in Gamma Rays,” JCAP 09, 042 (2019), arXiv:1901.03822 [astro-ph.HE] .
  34. Mattia Di Mauro, “Characteristics of the Galactic Center excess measured with 11 years of F⁢e⁢r⁢m⁢i𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖Fermiitalic_F italic_e italic_r italic_m italic_i-LAT data,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 063029 (2021), arXiv:2101.04694 [astro-ph.HE] .
  35. Martin Pohl, Oscar Macias, Phaedra Coleman,  and Chris Gordon, “Assessing the Impact of Hydrogen Absorption on the Characteristics of the Galactic Center Excess,” Astrophys. J. 929, 136 (2022), arXiv:2203.11626 [astro-ph.HE] .
  36. Samuel D. McDermott, Yi-Ming Zhong,  and Ilias Cholis, “A Phantom Menace: On the Morphology of the Galactic Center Excess,”   (2022), arXiv:2209.00006 [astro-ph.HE] .
  37. S. Abdollahi et al. (Fermi-LAT), “F⁢e⁢r⁢m⁢i𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖Fermiitalic_F italic_e italic_r italic_m italic_i Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. 247, 33 (2020), arXiv:1902.10045 [astro-ph.HE] .
  38. J. Ballet, T.H. Burnett, S.W. Digel,  and B. Lott (Fermi-LAT), “Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 2,”   (2020), arXiv:2005.11208 [astro-ph.HE] .
  39. Soheila Abdollahi et al. (Fermi-LAT), “Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog,” Astrophys. J. Supp. 260, 53 (2022), arXiv:2201.11184 [astro-ph.HE] .
  40. J. Ballet, P. Bruel, T. H. Burnett,  and B. Lott (Fermi-LAT), “Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4),”   (2023), arXiv:2307.12546 [astro-ph.HE] .
  41. Brenna Coleman, Dylan Paterson, Chris Gordon, Oscar Macias,  and Harrison Ploeg, “Maximum Entropy Estimation of the Galactic Bulge Morphology via the VVV Red Clump,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 495, 3350–3372 (2020), arXiv:1911.04714 [astro-ph.GA] .
  42. “Fermi-LAT Performance,”  (2019).
  43. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT), “The Spectrum and Morphology of the F⁢e⁢r⁢m⁢i𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖Fermiitalic_F italic_e italic_r italic_m italic_i Bubbles,” Astrophys. J. 793, 64 (2014), arXiv:1407.7905 [astro-ph.HE] .
  44. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT), “The spectrum of isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission between 100 MeV and 820 GeV,” Astrophys. J. 799, 86 (2015), arXiv:1410.3696 [astro-ph.HE] .
  45. S. R. Hinton, “ChainConsumer,” The Journal of Open Source Software 1, 00045 (2016).
  46. J. Diemand, M. Kuhlen, P. Madau, M. Zemp, B. Moore, D. Potter,  and J. Stadel, “Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution,” Nature 454, 735–738 (2008), arXiv:0805.1244 [astro-ph] .
  47. M. Kuhlen, J. Diemand, P. Madau,  and M. Zemp, “The Via Lactea INCITE simulation: galactic dark matter substructure at high resolution,” in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 125 (2008) p. 012008, arXiv:0810.3614 [astro-ph] .
  48. V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, A. Ludlow, A. Jenkins, A. Helmi, J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk,  and S. D. M. White, “The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, 1685–1711 (2008), arXiv:0809.0898 [astro-ph] .
  49. R. Launhardt, R. Zylka,  and P. G. Mezger, “The nuclear bulge of the Galaxy. III. Large-scale physical characteristics of stars and interstellar matter,” Astron. Astrophys. 384, 112–139 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201294 [astro-ph] .
  50. Oscar Macias, Deheng Song,  and Manoj Kaplinghat, “Private communication,”  (2023).
  51. H. T. Freudenreich, “Cobe’s galactic bar and disk,” Astrophys. J. 492, 495–510 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9707340 .
  52. Ilias Cholis, Dan Hooper,  and Tim Linden, “A New Determination of the Spectra and Luminosity Function of Gamma-Ray Millisecond Pulsars,”   (2014), arXiv:1407.5583 [astro-ph.HE] .
  53. A. W. Strong and I. V. Moskalenko, “Propagation of cosmic-ray nucleons in the Galaxy,” Astrophys. J. 509, 212–228 (1998), astro-ph/9807150 .
Citations (6)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free