Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Lower Bounds of Entanglement Quantifiers Based On Entanglement Witnesses

Published 29 Dec 2023 in quant-ph | (2312.17620v1)

Abstract: To quantify the entanglement of bipartite systems in terms of some entanglement measure is a challenging problem in general, and it is much worse when the information about the system is less. In this manuscript, based on two classes of entanglement criteria, we present a method to obtain the lower bounds of the entanglement measures, concurrence, entanglement of formation, and geometrical entanglement measure.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 81, no. 2, p. 865, 2009.
  2. M. B. Plenio and S. S. Virmani, “An introduction to entanglement theory,” in Quantum Information and Coherence.   Springer, 2014, pp. 173–209.
  3. A. K. Ekert, “Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem,” Physical review letters, vol. 67, no. 6, p. 661, 1991.
  4. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels,” Physical review letters, vol. 70, no. 13, p. 1895, 1993.
  5. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, “Communication via one-and two-particle operators on einstein-podolsky-rosen states,” Physical review letters, vol. 69, no. 20, p. 2881, 1992.
  6. A. Peres, “Separability criterion for density matrices,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 8, p. 1413, 1996.
  7. L. Gurvits, “Classical deterministic complexity of edmonds’ problem and quantum entanglement,” in Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 2003, pp. 10–19.
  8. D. Chruściński and G. Sarbicki, “Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 47, no. 48, p. 483001, 2014.
  9. D. Chruściński, G. Sarbicki, and F. Wudarski, “Entanglement witnesses from mutually unbiased bases,” Physical Review A, vol. 97, no. 3, p. 032318, 2018.
  10. T. Li, L.-M. Lai, D.-F. Liang, S.-M. Fei, and Z.-X. Wang, “Entanglement witnesses based on symmetric informationally complete measurements,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 59, pp. 3549–3557, 2020.
  11. K. Siudzińska and D. Chruściński, “Entanglement witnesses from mutually unbiased measurements,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 22988, 2021.
  12. J. Hald, J. Sω𝜔\omegaitalic_ωrensen, C. Schori, and E. Polzik, “Spin squeezed atoms: a macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light,” Physical review letters, vol. 83, no. 7, p. 1319, 1999.
  13. R. Blatt and D. Wineland, “Entangled states of trapped atomic ions,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 1008–1015, 2008.
  14. A. Sω𝜔\omegaitalic_ωrensen, L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Many-particle entanglement with bose–einstein condensates,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6816, pp. 63–66, 2001.
  15. G. Vitagliano, P. Hyllus, I. L. Egusquiza, and G. Tóth, “Spin squeezing inequalities for arbitrary spin,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 24, p. 240502, 2011.
  16. G. Vitagliano, I. Apellaniz, I. L. Egusquiza, and G. Tóth, “Spin squeezing and entanglement for an arbitrary spin,” Physical Review A, vol. 89, no. 3, p. 032307, 2014.
  17. S. Imai, G. Toth, and G. Otfried, “Collective randomized measurements in quantum information processing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10745, 2023.
  18. K. Lange, J. Peise, B. Lücke, I. Kruse, G. Vitagliano, I. Apellaniz, M. Kleinmann, G. Tóth, and C. Klempt, “Entanglement between two spatially separated atomic modes,” Science, vol. 360, no. 6387, pp. 416–418, 2018.
  19. D. Shin, B. Henson, S. Hodgman, T. Wasak, J. Chwedeńczuk, and A. Truscott, “Bell correlations between spatially separated pairs of atoms,” Nature communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4447, 2019.
  20. P. Colciaghi, Y. Li, P. Treutlein, and T. Zibold, “Einstein-podolsky-rosen experiment with two bose-einstein condensates,” Physical Review X, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 021031, 2023.
  21. S. Eckart, D. Trabert, J. Rist, A. Geyer, L. P. H. Schmidt, K. Fehre, and M. Kunitski, “Ultrafast preparation and detection of entangled atoms,” Science Advances, vol. 9, no. 36, p. eabq8227, 2023.
  22. W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 10, p. 2245, 1998.
  23. V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, “Entanglement measures and purification procedures,” Physical Review A, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 1619, 1998.
  24. G. Vidal and R. Tarrach, “Robustness of entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 1, p. 141, 1999.
  25. B. M. Terhal and P. Horodecki, “Schmidt number for density matrices,” Physical Review A, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 040301, 2000.
  26. G. Vidal, “Entanglement monotones,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 47, no. 2-3, pp. 355–376, 2000.
  27. T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, “Geometric measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states,” Physical Review A, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 042307, 2003.
  28. M. Christandl and A. Winter, ““squashed entanglement”: an additive entanglement measure,” Journal of mathematical physics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 829–840, 2004.
  29. X. Shi and L. Chen, “An extension of entanglement measures for pure states,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 533, no. 4, p. 2000462, 2021.
  30. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, “Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction,” Physical Review A, vol. 54, no. 5, p. 3824, 1996.
  31. Y. Huang, “Computing quantum discord is np-complete,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 033027, mar 2014.
  32. K. Chen, S. Albeverio, and S.-M. Fei, “Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states,” Physical review letters, vol. 95, no. 4, p. 040504, 2005.
  33. F. G. Brandao, “Quantifying entanglement with witness operators,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, no. 2, p. 022310, 2005.
  34. J. I. de Vicente, “Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions,” Physical Review A, vol. 75, no. 5, p. 052320, 2007.
  35. Z.-H. Chen, Z.-H. Ma, O. Gühne, and S. Severini, “Estimating entanglement monotones with a generalization of the wootters formula,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 20, p. 200503, 2012.
  36. M. Li, Z. Wang, J. Wang, S. Shen, and S.-m. Fei, “Improved lower bounds of concurrence and convex-roof extended negativity based on bloch representations,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2020.
  37. X. Shi and Y. Sun, “A family of separability criteria and lower bounds of concurrence,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 131, 2023.
  38. W. Song, L. Chen, and Z.-l. Cao, “Lower and upper bounds for entanglement of renyi-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α entropy,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 23, 2016.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free