Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An Explainable AI Approach to Large Language Model Assisted Causal Model Auditing and Development

Published 23 Dec 2023 in cs.AI, cs.HC, and cs.LG | (2312.16211v1)

Abstract: Causal networks are widely used in many fields, including epidemiology, social science, medicine, and engineering, to model the complex relationships between variables. While it can be convenient to algorithmically infer these models directly from observational data, the resulting networks are often plagued with erroneous edges. Auditing and correcting these networks may require domain expertise frequently unavailable to the analyst. We propose the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT as an auditor for causal networks. Our method presents ChatGPT with a causal network, one edge at a time, to produce insights about edge directionality, possible confounders, and mediating variables. We ask ChatGPT to reflect on various aspects of each causal link and we then produce visualizations that summarize these viewpoints for the human analyst to direct the edge, gather more data, or test further hypotheses. We envision a system where LLMs, automated causal inference, and the human analyst and domain expert work hand in hand as a team to derive holistic and comprehensive causal models for any given case scenario. This paper presents first results obtained with an emerging prototype.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Multimodel inference: understanding aic and bic in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2):261–304, 2004.
  2. D. M. Chickering. Optimal structure identification with greedy search. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov):507–554, 2002.
  3. Once upon a time in visualization: Understanding the use of textual narratives for causality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(2):1332–1342, 2020.
  4. Reactionflow: An interactive visualization tool for causality analysis in biological pathways. In BMC Proceedings, vol. 9, pp. 1–18, 2015.
  5. N. Elmqvist and P. Tsigas. Causality visualization using animated growing polygons. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 189–196, 2003.
  6. Is chatgpt a good causal reasoner? a comprehensive evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07375, 2023.
  7. J. Gerring. Causation: A unified framework for the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(2):163–198, 2005.
  8. B. Ghai and K. Mueller. D-bias: A causality-based human-in-the-loop system for tackling algorithmic bias. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1):473–482, 2022.
  9. Causal inference in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 34:61–75, 2013.
  10. Vaine: Visualization and ai for natural experiments. In IEEE VIS, pp. 21–25, 2021.
  11. Causalvis: Visualizations for causal inference. In ACM CHI, pp. 1–20, 2023.
  12. M. N. Hoque and K. Mueller. Outcome-explorer: A causality guided interactive visual interface for interpretable algorithmic decision making. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(12):4728–4740, 2021.
  13. Visual causality analysis of event sequence data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(2):1343–1352, 2020.
  14. Visualizing causal semantics using animations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1254–1261, 2007.
  15. Causal support: modeling causal inferences with visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(1):1150–1160, 2021.
  16. Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00050, 2023.
  17. Causal reasoning and large language models: Opening a new frontier for causality, 2023.
  18. Causal discovery with language models as imperfect experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02390, 2023.
  19. Can large language models build causal graphs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05279, 2023.
  20. Show and tell: Learning causal structures from observations and explanations. PsyArXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wjs9q, 2023.
  21. A million variables and more: the fast greedy equivalence search algorithm for learning high-dimensional graphical causal models, with an application to functional magnetic resonance images. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 3:121–129, 2017.
  22. Uniform consistency in causal inference. Biometrika, 90(3):491–515, 2003.
  23. Iterative causal discovery in the possible presence of latent confounders and selection bias. NIPS, 34:2454–2465, 2021.
  24. G. Schwarz. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of statistics, pp. 461–464, 1978.
  25. C. Shalizi. Advanced Data Analysis from an Elementary Point of View, chapter 22.6 Limitations on Consistency of Causal Discovery. CMU lectures https://www.stat.cmu.edu/ cshalizi/ADAfaEPoV/ADAfaEPoV.pdf, 2003.
  26. An evaluation toolkit to guide model selection and cohort definition in causal inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00442, 2019.
  27. P. Spirtes. An anytime algorithm for causal inference. In International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 278–285, 2001.
  28. Causation, Prediction, and Search, Second Edition. MIT press, 2000.
  29. Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(6):1776–1786, 2016.
  30. J. Wang and K. Mueller. The visual causality analyst: An interactive interface for causal reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1):230–239, 2015.
  31. J. Wang and K. Mueller. Visual causality analysis made practical. In IEEE VAST, pp. 151–161, 2017.
  32. J. Wang and K. Mueller. Domino: Visual causal reasoning with time-dependent phenomena. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2022.
  33. A visual analytics approach for exploratory causal analysis: Exploration, validation, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(2):1448–1458, 2020.
  34. Illusion of causality in visualized data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1):853–862, 2019.
  35. Silva: Interactively assessing machine learning fairness using causality. In ACM CHI, pp. 1–13, 2020.
  36. A survey on extraction of causal relations from natural language text. Knowledge and Information Systems, 64(5):1161–1186, 2022.
  37. An exploratory user study of visual causality analysis. Computer Graphics Forum, 38(3):173–184, 2019.
Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.