Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A dynamic approach to ceteris paribus counterfactuals (2312.15209v1)

Published 23 Dec 2023 in cs.LO

Abstract: Counterfactuals are conditional statements describing consequences of states of affairs that might not have occurred. Ceteris paribus counterfactuals take into account specific conditions which hold at the actual state of affairs, and which ought to be kept unchanged throughout the evaluation. Inspired by the approach of Girard and Triplett, we define ceteris paribus conditionals as dynamic operators over (weakly) centered sphere models. We introduce three ways of evaluating the operators, by updating sphere models based on ceteris paribus sets of formulas. Our approach features two main novelties: on the one hand, we define our ceteris paribus conditionals as proper dynamic operators, thus allowing for iterated evaluations. On the other hand, when updating the worlds within a system of sphere we additionally take into account a notion of 'significance' of the formulas that ought to be kept unchanged. We discuss the relations of our model updates with other prioritisations introduced in the literature, and show completeness of the set of valid formulas in the updated centered (resp. weakly centered) sphere models with respect to Lewis' axiomatization of the conditional logic VC (resp. VW).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Burgess, J.: Quick completeness proofs for some logics of conditionals. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (1981) Lewis [1979] Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  2. Lewis, D.: Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476 (1979) Fine [1975] Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  3. Fine, K.: Critical notice. Mind 84(1), 451–458 (1975) Priest [2008] Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  4. Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801174 Weiss [2017] Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  5. Weiss, Y.: Semantics for counterpossibles. The Australasian Journal of Logic 14(4), 383–407 (2017) Von Wright [1963] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  6. Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference. Philosophy 40(151) (1963) Von Wright [1972] Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  7. Von Wright, G.H.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theory and Decision 3(2) (1972) Van Benthem et al. [2009] Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  8. Van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of philosophical logic 38(1), 83–125 (2009) Goodman [1947] Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  9. Goodman, N.: The problem of counterfactual conditionals. The Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 113–128 (1947) Kratzer [1981] Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  10. Kratzer, A.: Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 201–216 (1981) Kaufmann [2013] Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  11. Kaufmann, S.: Causal premise semantics. Cognitive science 37(6), 1136–1170 (2013) Girard and Triplett [2015] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  12. Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 176–193 (2015) Girard and Triplett [2018] Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  13. Girard, P., Triplett, M.A.: Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning. Synthese 195(4), 1681–1703 (2018) Van Ditmarsch et al. [2007] Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007) Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
  14. Van Ditmarsch, H., Der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic vol. 337. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.