Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

High-fidelity, multi-qubit generalized measurements with dynamic circuits

Published 21 Dec 2023 in quant-ph | (2312.14087v2)

Abstract: Generalized measurements, also called positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), can offer advantages over projective measurements in various quantum information tasks. Here, we realize a generalized measurement of one and two superconducting qubits with high fidelity and in a single experimental setting. To do so, we propose a hybrid method, the "Naimark-terminated binary tree," based on a hybridization of Naimark's dilation and binary tree techniques that leverages emerging hardware capabilities for mid-circuit measurements and feed-forward control. Furthermore, we showcase a highly effective use of approximate compiling to enhance POVM fidelity in noisy conditions. We argue that our hybrid method scales better toward larger system sizes than its constituent methods and demonstrate its advantage by performing detector tomography of symmetric, informationally complete POVM (SIC-POVM). Detector fidelity is further improved through a composite error mitigation strategy that incorporates twirling and a newly devised conditional readout error mitigation. Looking forward, we expect improvements in approximate compilation and hardware noise for dynamic circuits to enable generalized measurements of larger multi-qubit POVMs on superconducting qubits.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
  2. J. A. Bergou, Discrimination of quantum states, J. Mod. Opt. 57, 160 (2010).
  3. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  4. N. Gisin and R. Thew, Quantum communication, Nat. Photonics 1, 165 (2007).
  5. G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, J. Phys. A 47, 424006 (2014).
  6. J. Bae and L.-C. Kwek, Quantum state discrimination and its applications, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 48, 083001 (2015).
  7. A. J. Scott, Tight informationally complete quantum measurements, J. Phys. A 39, 13507 (2006).
  8. T. Vértesi and E. Bene, Two-qubit bell inequality for which positive operator-valued measurements are relevant, Phys. Rev. A 82, 062115 (2010).
  9. W. J. Yun, H. Baek, and J. Kim, Projection valued measure-based quantum machine learning for multi-class classification (2022), arXiv:2210.16731 [quant-ph] .
  10. There also exist scalable probabilistic methods to implement general POVMs with a finite success probability [47, 48].
  11. M. A. Naimark, A. I. Loginov, and V. S. Shul'man, Non-self-adjoint operator algebras in hilbert space, J. Sov. Math. 5, 250 (1976).
  12. A. Peres, Neumark's theorem and quantum inseparability, Found. Phys. 20, 1441 (1990).
  13. Y. S. Yordanov and C. H. W. Barnes, Implementation of a general single-qubit positive operator-valued measure on a circuit-based quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 100, 062317 (2019).
  14. E. Andersson and D. K. L. Oi, Binary search trees for generalized measurements, Phys. Rev. A 77, 052104 (2008).
  15. L. Madden and A. Simonetto, Best approximate quantum compiling problems, ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 3, 1 (2022).
  16. The Qiskit implementation of the POVMs and CREM is available at https://github.com/petr-ivashkov/dynamic-circuit-povms.
  17. E. Haapasalo, T. Heinosaari, and J.-P. Pellonpää, Quantum measurements on finite dimensional systems: relabeling and mixing, Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 1751 (2011).
  18. V. N. Ivanova-Rohling, N. Rohling, and G. Burkard, Optimal quantum state tomography with noisy gates, EPJ Quantum Technol. 10, 1 (2023).
  19. M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  20. E. Knill, Fault-tolerant postselected quantum computation: Schemes (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0402171 [quant-ph] .
  21. M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, Efficient error models for fault-tolerant architectures and the pauli twirling approximation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012314 (2013).
  22. J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052325 (2016).
  23. E. van den Berg, Z. K. Minev, and K. Temme, Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032620 (2022).
  24. IBM Quantum Platform: Compute resources, Accessed: 2023-09-30.
  25. T. Singal, F. B. Maciejewski, and M. Oszmaniec, Implementation of quantum measurements using classical resources and only a single ancillary qubit, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 1 (2022).
  26. J. A. Smolin, J. M. Gambetta, and G. Smith, Efficient method for computing the maximum-likelihood quantum state from measurements with additive gaussian noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070502 (2012).
  27. J. Preskill, Lecture notes for ph219/cs219 quantum computation, accessed: 2023-05-20.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.