Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Searching for Axial Neutral Current Non-Standard Interactions of neutrinos by DUNE-like experiments

Published 19 Dec 2023 in hep-ph and hep-ex | (2312.12420v2)

Abstract: The increasingly precise neutrino experiments raise the hope for searching for new physics through studying the impact of Neutral Current (NC) Non-Standard Interactions (NSI) of neutrinos with matter fields. Neutrino oscillation experiments along with the Elastic Coherent ν\nu Nucleus Scattering (CEν\nuNS) experiments already set strong bounds on all the flavor elements of the "vector" NC NSI. However, "axial" NC NSI can hide from these experiments. We show how a DUNE-like experiment can probe these couplings by studying NC Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) events. We find that strong bounds can be set on the axial NC NSI of neutrinos with the uu, dd, and ss quarks. We show that using both the near and far detectors, a DUNE-like experiment can significantly improve the present bounds on all the flavor elements.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Front. in Phys. 6, 10 (2018), arXiv:1710.09360 [hep-ph] .
  2. N. Bernal and Y. Farzan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035007 (2023), arXiv:2211.15686 [hep-ph] .
  3. Y. Farzan, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135349 (2020), arXiv:1912.09408 [hep-ph] .
  4. P. Bakhti and Y. Farzan, JHEP 07, 109 (2016), arXiv:1602.07099 [hep-ph] .
  5. Y. Farzan and I. M. Shoemaker, JHEP 07, 033 (2016), arXiv:1512.09147 [hep-ph] .
  6. Y. Farzan, Phys. Lett. B 748, 311 (2015), arXiv:1505.06906 [hep-ph] .
  7. P. Bakhti and Y. Farzan, JHEP 07, 064 (2014), arXiv:1403.0744 [hep-ph] .
  8. O. G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa, New J. Phys. 17, 095002 (2015), arXiv:1505.06254 [hep-ph] .
  9. I. Bischer and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036006 (2019), arXiv:1810.02220 [hep-ph] .
  10. Y. Farzan and J. Heeck, Phys. Rev. D 94, 053010 (2016), arXiv:1607.07616 [hep-ph] .
  11. Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report, Vol. 2 (2019) arXiv:1907.00991 [hep-ph] .
  12. M. Masud and P. Mehta, Phys. Rev. D 94, 053007 (2016), arXiv:1606.05662 [hep-ph] .
  13. A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, JHEP 06, 026 (2013), arXiv:1304.1042 [hep-ph] .
  14. A. Formozov, Search for Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with large-volume liquid scintillator detectors, Ph.D. thesis, Milan U. (2019).
  15. P. Weatherly (Super-Kamiokande), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 888, 012190 (2017).
  16. A. N. Khan and D. W. McKay, JHEP 07, 143 (2017), arXiv:1704.06222 [hep-ph] .
  17. S.-F. Ge and A. Y. Smirnov, JHEP 10, 138 (2016), arXiv:1607.08513 [hep-ph] .
  18. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube), PoS EPS-HEP2021, 245 (2022).
  19. T. J. Kärkkäinen and Z. Trócsányi, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115020 (2023), arXiv:2301.06621 [hep-ph] .
  20. P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, Phys. Rev. D 106, 015022 (2022), arXiv:2204.09060 [hep-ph] .
  21. C. A. Argüelles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 15 (2023), arXiv:2203.10811 [hep-ph] .
  22. C. Giunti, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035039 (2020), arXiv:1909.00466 [hep-ph] .
  23. C. A. Argüelles et al., Rept. Prog. Phys. 83, 124201 (2020), arXiv:1907.08311 [hep-ph] .
  24. P. Coloma, JHEP 03, 016 (2016), arXiv:1511.06357 [hep-ph] .
  25. P. Coloma and T. Schwetz, Phys. Rev. D 94, 055005 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 079903 (2017)], arXiv:1604.05772 [hep-ph] .
  26. S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, PoS NuFact2021, 059 (2022), arXiv:2201.10412 [hep-ph] .
  27. S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 051802 (2021), arXiv:2008.04161 [hep-ph] .
  28. A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. D 83, 101701 (2011), arXiv:1101.3875 [hep-ph] .
  29. L. A. Delgadillo and O. G. Miranda, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095024 (2023), arXiv:2304.05545 [hep-ph] .
  30. J. Manczak et al. (KM3NeT), PoS ICRC2021, 1165 (2021).
  31. G. P. Zeller et al. (NuTeV), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091802 (2002), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 90, 239902 (2003)], arXiv:hep-ex/0110059 .
  32. J. Dorenbosch et al. (CHARM), Phys. Lett. B 180, 303 (1986).
  33. P. Vilain et al. (CHARM-II), Phys. Lett. B 335, 246 (1994).
  34. T.-J. Hou et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021), arXiv:1912.10053 [hep-ph] .
  35. J. Tingey et al., JINST 18, P06032 (2023), arXiv:2206.14904 [hep-ex] .
  36.  https://glaucus.crc.nd.edu/DUNEFluxes/ .
  37. B. Abi, R. Acciarri, et al., “Experiment simulation configurations approximating dune tdr,”  (2021), arXiv:2103.04797 [hep-ex] .
  38. B. Abi et al. (DUNE),   (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex] .
  39. B. Roe, Phys. Rev. D 95, 113004 (2017), arXiv:1707.02322 [hep-ex] .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free