Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Frequency-resolved Purcell effect for the dissipative generation of steady-state entanglement

Published 19 Dec 2023 in quant-ph, cond-mat.mes-hall, and physics.atom-ph | (2312.12372v1)

Abstract: We report a driven-dissipative mechanism to generate stationary entangled $W$ states among strongly-interacting quantum emitters placed within a cavity. Driving the ensemble into the highest energy state -- whether coherently or incoherently -- enables a subsequent cavity-enhanced decay into an entangled steady state consisting of a single de-excitation shared coherently among all emitters, i.e., a $W$ state, well known for its robustness against qubit loss. The non-harmonic energy structure of the interacting ensemble allows this transition to be resonantly selected by the cavity, while quenching subsequent off-resonant decays. Evidence of this purely dissipative mechanism should be observable in state-of-the-art cavity QED systems in the solid-state, enabling new prospects for the scalable stabilization of quantum states in dissipative quantum platforms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008).
  2. J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nature Photonics 3, 687 (2009).
  3. P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 347 (2015).
  4. J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum Reservoir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions, Physical Review Letters 77, 4728 (1996).
  5. F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Physics 5, 633 (2009).
  6. A. González-Tudela and D. Porras, Mesoscopic Entanglement Induced by Spontaneous Emission in Solid-State Quantum Optics, Physical Review Letters 110, 080502 (2013).
  7. H. R. Haakh and D. Martín-Cano, Squeezed Light from Entangled Nonidentical Emitters via Nanophotonic Environments, ACS Photonics 2, 1686 (2015).
  8. M. Reitz, C. Sommer, and C. Genes, Cooperative Quantum Phenomena in Light-Matter Platforms, PRX Quantum 3, 010201 (2022).
  9. M. J. Kastoryano, F. Reiter, and A. S. Sørensen, Dissipative Preparation of Entanglement in Optical Cavities, Physical Review Letters 106, 090502 (2011).
  10. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
  11. J. B. Brask, R. Chaves, and J. Kołodyński, Improved Quantum Magnetometry beyond the Standard Quantum Limit, Physical Review X 5, 031010 (2015).
  12. T. B. Hoang, G. M. Akselrod, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Ultrafast Room-Temperature Single Photon Emission from Quantum Dots Coupled to Plasmonic Nanocavities, Nano Letters 16, 270 (2016).
  13. B. Gurlek, V. Sandoghdar, and D. Martín-Cano, Manipulation of Quenching in Nanoantenna–Emitter Systems Enabled by External Detuned Cavities: A Path to Enhance Strong-Coupling, ACS Photonics 5, 456 (2018).
  14. C. D. Parmee and J. Ruostekoski, Signatures of optical phase transitions in superradiant and subradiant atomic arrays, Communications Physics 3, 1 (2020).
  15. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Physical Review A 62, 062314 (2000).
  16. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles, Physical Review Letters 86, 910 (2001).
  17. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, 3rd ed., Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer, Berlin ; New York, 2004).
  18. Z. Ficek and S. Swain, Quantum Interference and Coherence, Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 100 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005).
  19. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Vol. 9780199213 (Oxford University Press, 2007).
  20. A. Vivas-Viaña and C. Sánchez Muñoz, Two-photon resonance fluorescence of two interacting nonidentical quantum emitters, Physical Review Research 3, 33136 (2021).
  21. C. M. Savage, Stationary two-level atomic inversion in a quantized cavity field, Physical Review Letters 60, 1828 (1988).
  22. J. I. Cirac, Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit, Physical Review A 46, 4354 (1992).
  23. P. Zhou and S. Swain, Dynamics of a driven two-level atom coupled to a frequency-tunable cavity, Physical Review A 58, 1515 (1998).
  24. E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V. Pound, Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid, Physical Review 69, 37 (1946).
  25. Z. Ficek, R. Tanaś, and S. Kielich, Cooperative Effects in the Spontaneous Emission from Two Non-identical Atoms, Optica Acta: International Journal of Optics 33, 1149 (1986).
  26. H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999).
  27. See Supplemental Material for further information.
  28. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Physical Review Letters 80, 2245 (1998).
  29. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation and concurrence, Quantum Information and Computation 1, 27 (2001).
  30. M. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to entanglement measures, Quantum Information and Computation 7, 1 (2007).
  31. E. V. Goldstein and P. Meystre, Dipole-dipole interaction in optical cavities, Physical Review A 56, 5135 (1997).
  32. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Physical Review 93, 99 (1954).
  33. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012).
  34. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 184, 1234 (2013).
  35. A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence-Free Interaction between Giant Atoms in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics, Physical Review Letters 120, 140404 (2018).
  36. B. Krummheuer, V. M. Axt, and T. Kuhn, Theory of pure dephasing and the resulting absorption line shape in semiconductor quantum dots, Physical Review B 65, 195313 (2002).
  37. J. del Pino, J. Feist, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Quantum theory of collective strong coupling of molecular vibrations with a microcavity mode, New Journal of Physics 17, 053040 (2015).
  38. B. Prasanna Venkatesh, M. L. Juan, and O. Romero-Isart, Cooperative Effects in Closely Packed Quantum Emitters with Collective Dephasing, Physical Review Letters 120, 033602 (2018).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.