Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A single space-time is too small for all of Wigner's friends

Published 19 Dec 2023 in quant-ph and gr-qc | (2312.11759v2)

Abstract: Recent no-go theorems on interpretations of quantum theory featuring an assumption of Absoluteness of Observed Events' (AOE) are shown to have an unexpectedly strong corollary: one cannot reject AOE and at the same time assume that theobserved events' in question can all be embedded within a single background space-time common to all observers. Consequently, interpretations that reject AOE appear incompatible with a `block universe' view of space-time.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. C. A. Fuchs, QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism, arXiv preprint  (2010).
  2. Č. Brukner, A No-Go Theorem for Observer-Independent Facts, Entropy 20, 350 (2018).
  3. D. Frauchiger and R. Renner, Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself, Nature Communications 9, 3711 (2018).
  4. M. Pusey, Is QBism 80% complete, or 20%? (2017), YouTube video.
  5. M. Leifer, What are Copenhagenish interpretations and should they be perspectival? (2020), YouTube video.
  6. R. Healey, Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity, Foundations of Physics 48, 1568 (2018).
  7. G. Leegwater, When Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger Meet Wigner’s Friend, Foundations of Physics 52, 68 (2022).
  8. N. Ormrod and J. Barrett, A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic (2022), arXiv:2209.03940 [quant-ph].
  9. H. M. Wiseman, E. G. Cavalcanti, and E. G. Rieffel, A ”thoughtful” Local Friendliness no-go theorem: a prospective experiment with new assumptions to suit, Quantum 7, 1112 (2023).
  10. M. Haddara and E. G. Cavalcanti, A possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox, New Journal of Physics 25, 093028 (2023).
  11. A. Utreras-Alarcón, E. G. Cavalcanti, and H. M. Wiseman, Allowing Wigner’s friend to sequentially measure incompatible observables (2023), arXiv:2305.09102 [quant-ph].
  12. D. Schmid, Y. Yīng, and M. Leifer, A review and analysis of six extended Wigner’s friend arguments (2023), arXiv:2308.16220 [quant-ph].
  13. C. A. Fuchs, N. D. Mermin, and R. Schack, An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics, American Journal of Physics 82, 749 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4874855 .
  14. C. A. Fuchs and B. C. Stacey, QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero’s Handbook, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” Course 197 – Foundations of Quantum Physics, edited by E. M. Rasel, W. P. Schleich, and S. Wölk (IOS Press, Amsterdam; Società Italiana di Fisica, Bologna, 2018, 2018) pp. 133–202.
  15. C. Rovelli, Relational Quantum Mechanics, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35, 1637 (1996).
  16. F. Laudisa and C. Rovelli, Relational Quantum Mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021) spring 2021 ed.
  17. R. A. Healey, Representation and the quantum state (2021), to appear in Valia Allori (ed.) Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality. Springer.
  18. H. Zwirn, Convivial Solipsism as a maximally perspectival interpretation, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2310.06815 (2023).
  19. D. Dieks, Perspectival Quantum Realism, Foundations of Physics 52, 95 (2022).
  20. E. G. Cavalcanti, The View from a Wigner Bubble, Foundations of Physics 51, 39 (2021).
  21. C. A. Fuchs, M. Schlosshauer, and B. C. Stacey, My Struggles with the Block Universe (2015).
  22. C. A. Fuchs, private communication (2023).
  23. N. D. Mermin, Commentary: What I think about Now, Physics Today 67, 8 (2014).
  24. C. A. Fuchs, Interview with a Quantum Bayesian, in Elegance and Enigma: The Quantum Interviews, The Frontiers Collection, edited by Schlosshauer (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).
  25. P. Martin-Dussaud, C. Rovelli, and F. Zalamea, The Notion of Locality in Relational Quantum Mechanics, Foundations of Physics 49, 96 (2019).
  26. J. Pienaar, Comment on “The Notion of Locality in Relational Quantum Mechanics”, Foundations of Physics 49, 1404 (2019).
  27. L. Freidel, R. G. Leigh, and D. Minic, Modular Spacetime and Metastring Theory, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 804, 012032 (2017).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 10 likes about this paper.