Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gate-defined superconducting channel in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene

Published 18 Dec 2023 in cond-mat.mes-hall | (2312.11698v1)

Abstract: Magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene (MATBG) combines in one single material different phases like insulating, metallic and superconducting. These phases and their in-situ tunability make MATBG an important platform for the fabrication of superconducting devices. We realize a split gate-defined geometry which enables us to tune the width of a superconducting channel formed in MATBG. We observe a smooth transition from superconductivity to highly resistive transport by progressively reducing the channel width using the split gates or by reducing the density in the channel. Using the gate-defined constriction, we control the flow of the supercurrent, either guiding it through the constriction or throughout the whole device or even blocking its passage completely. This serves as a foundation for developing quantum constriction devices like superconducting quantum point contacts, quantum dots, and Cooper-pair boxes in MATBG.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras,  and P. Jarillo-Herrero, “Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).
  2. M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young,  and C. R. Dean, “Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).
  3. F. K. de Vries, E. Portolés, G. Zheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin,  and P. Rickhaus, “Gate-defined josephson junctions in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 760–763 (2021).
  4. Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Yuan Cao, Jeong Min Park, Sergio C. de la Barrera, Mallika T. Randeria, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi,  and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Highly tunable junctions and non-local josephson effect in magic-angle graphene tunneling devices,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 769–775 (2021).
  5. J. Díez-Mérida, A. Díez-Carlón, S. Y. Yang, Y.-M. Xie, X.-J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Higginbotham, K. T. Law,  and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Symmetry-broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat Commun 14, 2396 (2023).
  6. E. Portolés, S. Iwakiri, G. Zheng, P. Rickhaus, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin,  and F. K. de Vries, “A tunable monolithic squid in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 1159–1164 (2022).
  7. S. Iwakiri, A. Mestre-Torà, E. Portolés, M. Visscher, M. Perego, G. Zheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Sigrist, T. Ihn,  and K. Ensslin, “Tunable quantum interferometer for correlated moiré electrons,”   (2023), arXiv:2308.07400 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  8. H. Overweg, H. Eggimann, X. Chen, S. Slizovskiy, M. Eich, R. Pisoni, Y. Lee, P. Rickhaus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, V. Fal’ko, T. Ihn,  and K. Ensslin, “Electrostatically induced quantum point contacts in bilayer graphene,” Nano Letters 18, 553–559 (2018), pMID: 29286668.
  9. S. Nakaharai, J. R. Williams,  and C. M. Marcus, “Gate-defined graphene quantum point contact in the quantum hall regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036602 (2011).
  10. T. Ohta, A. Bostwick, T. Seyller, K. Horn,  and E. Rotenberg, “Controlling the electronic structure of bilayer graphene,” Science 313, 951–954 (2006).
  11. J. B. Oostinga, H. B. Heersche, X. Liu, A. F. Morpurgo,  and Lieven M.K. V., “Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices,” Nature Materials 7, 151–157 (2008).
  12. C W Beenakker and van Houten H, “Josephson current through a superconducting quantum point contact shorter than the coherence length,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3056–3059 (1991).
  13. T Bauch, E Hürfeld, V M Krasnov, P Delsing, H Takayanagi,  and T Akazaki, “Correlated quantization of supercurrent and conductance in a superconducting quantum point contact,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 71, 174502 (2005).
  14. S. Abay, D. Persson, H. Nilsson, H Q Xu, M. Fogelström, V. Shumeiko,  and P. Delsing, “Quantized conductance and its correlation to the supercurrent in a nanowire connected to superconductors,” Nano Lett. 13, 3614–3617 (2013).
  15. Hiroshi Irie, Yuichi Harada, Hiroki Sugiyama,  and Tatsushi Akazaki, “Josephson coupling through one-dimensional ballistic channel in semiconductor-superconductor hybrid quantum point contacts,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 165415 (2014).
  16. Hideaki Takayanagi, Tatsushi Akazaki,  and Junsaku Nitta, “Observation of maximum supercurrent quantization in a superconducting quantum point contact,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3533–3536 (1995).
  17. J. Xiang, A Vidan, M Tinkham, R M Westervelt,  and C. M. Lieber, “Ge/Si nanowire mesoscopic josephson junctions,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 1, 208–213 (2006).
  18. N W Hendrickx, M L V Tagliaferri, M Kouwenhoven, R Li, D P Franke, A Sammak, A Brinkman, G Scappucci,  and M Veldhorst, “Ballistic supercurrent discretization and micrometer-long josephson coupling in germanium,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 99, 075435 (2019).
  19. E. Mikheev, I. T. Rosen,  and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, “Quantized critical supercurrent in SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT-based quantum point contacts,” Sci Adv 7, eabi6520 (2021).
  20. Hiske Overweg, Electrostatically induced nanostructures in bilayer graphene, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland (2018).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.