Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Electrically Tunable Fine Structure of Negatively Charged Excitons in Gated Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots

Published 11 Dec 2023 in cond-mat.mes-hall | (2312.06264v1)

Abstract: We predict here the fine structure of an electrically tunable negatively charged exciton (trion) composed of two electrons and a hole confined in a gated bilayer graphene quantum dot (QD). We start with an atomistic approach, allowing us to compute confined electron and confined hole QD states for a structure containing over one million atoms. Using atomistic wavefunctions we compute Coulomb matrix elements and self-energies. In the next step, by solving the Bethe-Salpeter-like equation for trions, we describe a negatively charged exciton, built as a strongly interacting interlayer complex of two electrons in the conduction band and one hole in the valence band. Unlike in conventional semiconducting QDs, we show that the trion contains a fine structure composed of ten states arising from the valley and spin degrees of freedom. Finally, we obtain absorption into and emission from the trion states. We predict the existence of bright low-energy states and propose to extract the fine structure of the trion using the temperature dependence of emission spectra.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Materials 6, 183 (2007).
  2. E. McCann and M. Koshino, Reports on Progress in Physics 76, 056503 (2013), publisher: IOP Publishing.
  3. M. Prada, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115425 (2021).
  4. M. Aoki and H. Amawashi, Solid State Communications 142, 123 (2007).
  5. L. A. Falkovsky, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 110, 319 (2010).
  6. M. O. Sauer and T. G. Pedersen, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115416 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society.
  7. G. Bester, S. Nair, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 67, 161306 (2003).
  8. J. M. Pereira, P. Vasilopoulos, and F. M. Peeters, Nano Letters 7, 946 (2007), pMID: 17352503.
  9. C.-H. Park and S. G. Louie, Nano Letters 10, 426 (2010), publisher: American Chemical Society.
  10. A. Wojs and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10880 (1995).
  11. C. Riva, F. M. Peeters, and K. Varga, Phys. Rev. B 63, 115302 (2001).
  12. I. Ozfidan, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115314 (2015).
  13. A. Knothe and V. Fal’ko, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235423 (2020).
  14. J. Henriques, I. Epstein, and N. Peres, Physical Review B 105, 045411 (2022).
  15. P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3347 (1993).
  16. J. N. S. Gomes, C. Trallero-Giner, and M. I. Vasilevskiy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 045702 (2021).
  17. T. Deilmann, M. Drüppel, and M. Rohlfing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 196804 (2016).
  18. A. Torche and G. Bester, Phys. Rev. B 100, 201403 (2019a).
  19. T. Deilmann, M. Drüppel, and M. Rohlfing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 259902 (2019).
  20. G. A. Narvaez, G. Bester, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 72, 245318 (2005).
  21. A. Torche and G. Bester, Phys. Rev. B 100, 201403 (2019b).
  22. L. Szulakowska, M. Bieniek, and P. Hawrylak, Solid-State Electronics 155, 105 (2019), selected Papers from the Future Trends in Microelectronics (FTM-2018) Workshop.
  23. M. Cygorek, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B 101, 075307 (2020).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.