Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Information content and optimization of self-organized developmental systems

Published 10 Dec 2023 in physics.bio-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, nlin.AO, nlin.PS, and q-bio.TO | (2312.05895v2)

Abstract: A key feature of many developmental systems is their ability to self-organize spatial patterns of functionally distinct cell fates. To ensure proper biological function, such patterns must be established reproducibly, by controlling and even harnessing intrinsic and extrinsic fluctuations. While the relevant molecular processes are increasingly well understood, we lack a principled framework to quantify the performance of such stochastic self-organizing systems. To that end, we introduce a new information-theoretic measure for self-organized fate specification during embryonic development. We show that the proposed measure assesses the total information content of fate patterns, and decomposes it into interpretable contributions corresponding to the positional and correlational information. By optimizing the proposed measure, our framework provides a normative theory for developmental circuits, which we demonstrate on lateral inhibition, cell type proportioning, and reaction-diffusion models of self-organization. This paves a way towards a classification of developmental systems based on a common information-theoretic language, thereby organizing the zoo of implicated chemical and mechanical signaling processes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (74)
  1. L. Wolpert, “Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 25, 1–47 (1969).
  2. D. Jukam, S. A. M. Shariati,  and J. M. Skotheim, “Zygotic Genome Activation in Vertebrates,” Developmental Cell 42, 316–332 (2017).
  3. T. Gregor, D. W. Tank, E. F. Wieschaus,  and W. Bialek, “Probing the Limits to Positional Information,” Cell 130, 153–164 (2007).
  4. J. O. Dubuis, G. Tkacik, E. F. Wieschaus, T. Gregor,  and W. Bialek, “Positional information, in bits,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 16301–16308 (2013), arxiv:1201.0198 .
  5. M. D. Petkova, G. Tkačik, W. Bialek, E. F. Wieschaus,  and T. Gregor, “Optimal Decoding of Cellular Identities in a Genetic Network,” Cell 176, 844–855.e15 (2019).
  6. S. Wennekamp, S. Mesecke, F. Nédélec,  and T. Hiiragi, “A self-organization framework for symmetry breaking in the mammalian embryo,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 14, 454–461 (2013).
  7. A. Warmflash, B. Sorre, F. Etoc, E. D. Siggia,  and A. H. Brivanlou, “A method to recapitulate early embryonic spatial patterning in human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Methods 11, 847–854 (2014).
  8. T. Sato, R. G. Vries, H. J. Snippert, M. Van De Wetering, N. Barker, D. E. Stange, J. H. Van Es, A. Abo, P. Kujala, P. J. Peters,  and H. Clevers, “Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche,” Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).
  9. D. Serra, U. Mayr, A. Boni, I. Lukonin, M. Rempfler, L. Challet Meylan, M. B. Stadler, P. Strnad, P. Papasaikas, D. Vischi, A. Waldt, G. Roma,  and P. Liberali, “Self-organization and symmetry breaking in intestinal organoid development,” Nature 569, 66–72 (2019).
  10. L. Beccari, N. Moris, M. Girgin, D. A. Turner, P. Baillie-Johnson, A.-C. Cossy, M. P. Lutolf, D. Duboule,  and A. M. Arias, “Multi-axial self-organization properties of mouse embryonic stem cells into gastruloids,” Nature 562, 272–276 (2018).
  11. F. Schweisguth and F. Corson, “Self-Organization in Pattern Formation,” Developmental Cell 49, 659–677 (2019).
  12. M. Zinner, I. Lukonin,  and P. Liberali, “Design principles of tissue organisation: How single cells coordinate across scales,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology 67, 37–45 (2020).
  13. C. Collinet and T. Lecuit, “Programmed and self-organized flow of information during morphogenesis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 22, 245–265 (2021).
  14. A. Kicheva and J. Briscoe, “Control of Tissue Development by Morphogens,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 39, annurev–cellbio–020823–011522 (2023).
  15. J. B. A. Green and J. Sharpe, “Positional information and reaction-diffusion: Two big ideas in developmental biology combine,” Development 142, 1203–1211 (2015).
  16. A. Bailles, E. W. Gehrels,  and T. Lecuit, “Mechanochemical Principles of Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Cells and Tissues,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 38, 321–347 (2022).
  17. N. Saiz, K. M. Williams, V. E. Seshan,  and A. K. Hadjantonakis, “Asynchronous fate decisions by single cells collectively ensure consistent lineage composition in the mouse blastocyst,” Nature Communications 7 (2016), 10.1038/ncomms13463.
  18. F. Tostevin and P. R. Ten Wolde, “Mutual Information between Input and Output Trajectories of Biochemical Networks,” Physical Review Letters 102, 218101 (2009).
  19. G. Tkačik and W. Bialek, “Information Processing in Living Systems,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 89–117 (2016).
  20. M. Reinhardt, G. Tkačik,  and P. R. Ten Wolde, “Path Weight Sampling: Exact Monte Carlo Computation of the Mutual Information between Stochastic Trajectories,” Physical Review X 13, 041017 (2023).
  21. G. Tkačik, C. G. Callan,  and W. Bialek, “Information flow and optimization in transcriptional regulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 12265–12270 (2008).
  22. G. Tkačik, J. O. Dubuis, M. D. Petkova,  and T. Gregor, “Positional information, Positional error, and readout precision in morphogenesis: A mathematical framework,” Genetics 199, 39–59 (2015), arxiv:1404.5599 .
  23. G. Tkačik and T. Gregor, “The many bits of positional information,” Development 148, dev176065 (2021).
  24. S. Watanabe, “Information Theoretical Analysis of Multivariate Correlation,” IBM Journal of Research and Development 4, 66–82 (1960).
  25. M. Studený and J. Vejnarová, “The Multiinformation Function as a Tool for Measuring Stochastic Dependence,” in Learning in Graphical Models, edited by M. I. Jordan (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1998) pp. 261–297.
  26. L. Wolpert, “The French flag problem: A contribution to the discussion on pattern development and regeneration,” in Towards a Theoretical Biology, Vol. 1 (Aldine Publishing Company, 1968).
  27. M. Zagorski, Y. Tabata, N. Brandenberg, M. P. Lutolf, T. Bollenbach, J. Briscoe,  and A. Kicheva, “Decoding of position in the developing neural tube from antiparallel morphogen gradients,” Science 356, 1379–1383 (2017).
  28. F. Corson and E. D. Siggia, “Geometry, epistasis, and developmental patterning,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 5568–5575 (2012).
  29. D. A. Rand, A. Raju, M. Sáez, F. Corson,  and E. D. Siggia, “Geometry of gene regulatory dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2109729118 (2021).
  30. D. Sprinzak, A. Lakhanpal, L. Lebon, L. A. Santat, M. E. Fontes, G. A. Anderson, J. Garcia-Ojalvo,  and M. B. Elowitz, “Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states,” Nature 465, 86–90 (2010).
  31. M. Cohen, M. Georgiou, N. L. Stevenson, M. Miodownik,  and B. Baum, “Dynamic Filopodia Transmit Intermittent Delta-Notch Signaling to Drive Pattern Refinement during Lateral Inhibition,” Developmental Cell 19, 78–89 (2010).
  32. F. Corson, L. Couturier, H. Rouault, K. Mazouni,  and F. Schweisguth, “Self-organized Notch dynamics generate stereotyped sensory organ patterns in Drosophila,” Science 356 (2017), 10.1126/science.aai7407.
  33. O. Gozlan and D. Sprinzak, “Notch signaling in development and homeostasis,” Development 150, dev201138 (2023).
  34. J. R. Collier, N. A. Monk, P. K. Maini,  and J. H. Lewis, “Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: A mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 183, 429–446 (1996).
  35. N. Barkai and S. Leibler, “Robustness in simple biochemical networks,” Nature 387, 913–917 (1997).
  36. G. Tkačik, A. M. Walczak,  and W. Bialek, “Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. III. A self-interacting gene,” Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 85, 1–16 (2012), arxiv:1112.5026 .
  37. G. Tkačik, J. S. Prentice, V. Balasubramanian,  and E. Schneidman, “Optimal population coding by noisy spiking neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 14419–14424 (2010).
  38. G. Huelsz-Prince, R. N. U. Kok, Y. Goos, L. Bruens, X. Zheng, S. Ellenbroek, J. Van Rheenen, S. Tans,  and J. S. Van Zon, “Mother cells control daughter cell proliferation in intestinal organoids to minimize proliferation fluctuations,” eLife 11, e80682 (2022).
  39. Y. Kitadate, D. J. Jörg, M. Tokue, A. Maruyama, R. Ichikawa, S. Tsuchiya, E. Segi-Nishida, T. Nakagawa, A. Uchida, C. Kimura-Yoshida, S. Mizuno, F. Sugiyama, T. Azami, M. Ema, C. Noda, S. Kobayashi, I. Matsuo, Y. Kanai, T. Nagasawa, Y. Sugimoto, S. Takahashi, B. D. Simons,  and S. Yoshida, “Competition for Mitogens Regulates Spermatogenic Stem Cell Homeostasis in an Open Niche,” Cell Stem Cell 24, 79–92.e6 (2019).
  40. D. Raina, A. Bahadori, A. Stanoev, M. Protzek, A. Koseska,  and C. Schröter, “Cell-cell communication through FGF4 generates and maintains robust proportions of differentiated cell types in embryonic stem cells,” Development 148 (2021), 10.1242/dev.199926.
  41. A. Stanoev, C. Schröter,  and A. Koseska, “Robustness and timing of cellular differentiation through population-based symmetry breaking,” Development , dev.197608 (2021).
  42. A. Raju and E. D. Siggia, A Geometrical Model of Cell Fate Specification in the Mouse Blastocyst, Preprint (Developmental Biology, 2023).
  43. S. Bergmann, O. Sandler, H. Sberro, S. Shnider, E. Schejter, B.-Z. Shilo,  and N. Barkai, “Pre-Steady-State Decoding of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient,” PLoS Biology 5, e46 (2007).
  44. A. Gierer and H. Meinhardt, “A Theory of Biological Pattern Formation,” Kybernetik 12, 30–39 (1972).
  45. L. A. Segel and J. L. Jackson, “Dissipative structure: An explanation and an ecological example,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 37, 545–559 (1972).
  46. S. Kondo and T. Miura, “Reaction-Diffusion Model as a Framework for Understanding Biological Pattern Formation,” Science 329, 1616–1620 (2010).
  47. A. D. Economou, A. Ohazama, T. Porntaveetus, P. T. Sharpe, S. Kondo, M. A. Basson, A. Gritli-Linde, M. T. Cobourne,  and J. B. A. Green, “Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate,” Nature Genetics 44, 348–351 (2012).
  48. R. Sheth, L. Marcon, M. F. Bastida, M. Junco, L. Quintana, R. Dahn, M. Kmita, J. Sharpe,  and M. A. Ros, “Hox Genes Regulate Digit Patterning by Controlling the Wavelength of a Turing-Type Mechanism,” Science 338, 1476–1480 (2012).
  49. T. Stückemann, J. P. Cleland, S. Werner, H. Thi-Kim Vu, R. Bayersdorf, S. Y. Liu, B. Friedrich, F. Jülicher,  and J. C. Rink, “Antagonistic Self-Organizing Patterning Systems Control Maintenance and Regeneration of the Anteroposterior Axis in Planarians,” Developmental Cell 40, 248–263.e4 (2017).
  50. S. Werner, T. Stückemann, M. Beirán Amigo, J. C. Rink, F. Jülicher,  and B. M. Friedrich, “Scaling and regeneration of self-organized patterns,” Physical Review Letters 114, 1–5 (2015), arxiv:1411.2359 .
  51. H. G. Othmer and E. Pate, ‘‘Scale-invariance in reaction-diffusion models of spatial pattern formation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 77, 4180–4184 (1980).
  52. D. Ben-Zvi and N. Barkai, “Scaling of morphogen gradients by an expansion-repression integral feedback control,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 6924–6929 (2010).
  53. U. Alon, An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits (Chapman & Hall, 2006).
  54. W. H. de Ronde, F. Tostevin,  and P. R. ten Wolde, “Feed-forward loops and diamond motifs lead to tunable transmission of information in the frequency domain,” Physical Review E 86, 021913 (2012).
  55. S. Lloyd, “Measures of complexity: A nonexhaustive list,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21, 7–8 (2001).
  56. M. Gell-Mann and S. Lloyd, “Information measures, effective complexity, and total information,” Complexity 2, 44–52 (1996).
  57. W. Młynarski, M. Hledík, T. R. Sokolowski,  and G. Tkačik, “Statistical analysis and optimality of neural systems,” Neuron  (2021), 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.020.
  58. P. François, V. Hakim,  and E. D. Siggia, “Deriving structure from evolution: Metazoan segmentation,” Molecular Systems Biology 3, 1–9 (2007).
  59. A. Pezzotta and J. Briscoe, “Optimal control of gene regulatory networks for morphogen-driven tissue patterning,” Cell Systems 14, 940–952.e11 (2023).
  60. T. R. Sokolowski, T. Gregor, W. Bialek,  and G. Tkačik, “Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle,”  (2023), arxiv:2302.05680 [physics, q-bio] .
  61. P. François and E. D. Siggia, ‘‘Predicting embryonic patterning using mutual entropy fitness and in silico evolution,” Development 137, 2385–2395 (2010).
  62. A. Yanagida, E. Corujo-Simon, C. K. Revell, P. Sahu, G. G. Stirparo, I. M. Aspalter, A. K. Winkel, R. Peters, H. De Belly, D. A. Cassani, S. Achouri, R. Blumenfeld, K. Franze, E. Hannezo, E. K. Paluch, J. Nichols,  and K. J. Chalut, “Cell surface fluctuations regulate early embryonic lineage sorting,” Cell 185, 777–793.e20 (2022).
  63. M. Merle, L. Friedman, C. Chureau,  and T. Gregor, “Precise and scalable self-organization in mammalian pseudo-embryos,”  (2023), arxiv:2303.17522 [physics, q-bio] .
  64. T. Krammer, H. T. Stuart, E. Gromberg, K. Ishihara, J. Wang, E. Costantini, S. Lehr, D. Cislo, L. Arbanas, A. Hörmann, R. A. Neumüller, N. Elvassore, E. Siggia, J. Briscoe, A. Kicheva,  and E. M. Tanaka, “Clonal neural tube organoids self-organise floorplate through BMP-mediated cluster competition,” bioRxiv  (2023), 10.1101/2023.06.25.546258.
  65. S. Chhabra, L. Liu, R. Goh, X. Kong,  and A. Warmflash, “Dissecting the dynamics of signaling events in the BMP, WNT, and NODAL cascade during self-organized fate patterning in human gastruloids,” PLoS Biology 17, 1–38 (2019).
  66. S. Lehr, D. B. Brückner, M. Greunz-Schindler, T. Minchington, J. Merring, E. Hannezo,  and A. Kicheva, “Self-organised pattern formation in the developing neural tube by a temporal relay of BMP signalling,” bioRxiv 2023.11.15.567070 (2023), 10.1101/2023.11.15.567070.
  67. F. Etoc, J. Metzger, A. Ruzo, C. Kirst, A. Yoney, M. Z. Ozair, A. H. Brivanlou,  and E. D. Siggia, “A Balance between Secreted Inhibitors and Edge Sensing Controls Gastruloid Self-Organization,” Developmental Cell 39, 302–315 (2016).
  68. M. Bauer, M. D. Petkova, T. Gregor, E. F. Wieschaus,  and W. Bialek, “Trading bits in the readout from a genetic network,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (2021), 10.1073/pnas.2109011118, arxiv:2012.15817 .
  69. L. Marcon, X. Diego, J. Sharpe,  and P. Müller, “High-throughput mathematical analysis identifies Turing networks for patterning with equally diffusing signals,” eLife 5, e14022 (2016).
  70. N. S. Scholes, D. Schnoerr, M. Isalan,  and M. P. Stumpf, “A Comprehensive Network Atlas Reveals That Turing Patterns Are Common but Not Robust,” Cell Systems 9, 243–257.e4 (2019).
  71. M. Nakajima, K. Imai, H. Ito, T. Nishiwaki, Y. Murayama, H. Iwasaki, T. Oyama,  and T. Kondo, “Reconstitution of Circadian Oscillation of Cyanobacterial KaiC Phosphorylation in Vitro,” Science 308, 414–415 (2005).
  72. H. C. Lee, C. Hastings, N. M. M. Oliveira, R. Pérez-Carrasco, K. M. Page, L. Wolpert,  and C. D. Stern, “‘Neighbourhood watch’ model: Embryonic epiblast cells assess positional information in relation to their neighbours,” Development 149, dev200295 (2022).
  73. G. Gut, M. D. Herrmann,  and L. Pelkmans, “Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states,” Science 361, eaar7042 (2018).
  74. G. De Medeiros, R. Ortiz, P. Strnad, A. Boni, F. Moos, N. Repina, L. Challet Meylan, F. Maurer,  and P. Liberali, “Multiscale light-sheet organoid imaging framework,” Nature Communications 13, 4864 (2022).
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an information-theoretic framework that quantifies self-organization in developmental systems using patterning and reproducibility entropy.
  • It decomposes informational measures into positional and correlational data to evaluate models like lateral inhibition, cell sorting, and reaction-diffusion dynamics.
  • The methodology offers actionable insights for designing robust biological patterns, with notable implications for synthetic biology and developmental research.

Information Content and Optimization of Self-Organized Developmental Systems

The paper "Information Content and Optimization of Self-Organized Developmental Systems" introduces a novel framework for assessing the efficacy of self-organizing biological systems that dictate cell fate during embryonic development. The research seeks to bridge the gap between well-known molecular processes and a quantitative measure of their organizational performance through an information-theoretic approach.

Self-organization in developmental biology refers to the ability of biological systems to autonomously form spatial patterns of cell fates. These systems are inherently stochastic due to intrinsic and extrinsic fluctuations, yet they aim to achieve consistent and reproducible patterns necessary for proper biological functions. The authors introduce a utility function comprised of two entropic components: the patterning entropy, which describes diversity in cell types, and the reproducibility entropy, which measures the similarity across replicates. The utility function optimally favors systems minimizing the latter while maximizing the former, thereby creating a comprehensive metric for analyzing self-organization efficacy.

The researchers expand upon this utility by dissecting the information into positional information (PI) and correlational information (CI). PI quantifies the order of cell fates relative to position, indicative of spatially structured patterns, whereas CI measures non-local correlations that enhance reproducibility but don't necessarily correspond to positional order.

Three paradigmatic models of self-organized patterning are evaluated within this framework: lateral inhibition signaling (LIS), cell-type proportioning and sorting, and reaction-diffusion (RD) dynamics. Lateral inhibition is explored first, utilizing a minimal model with a delta-notch pathway to establish an alternating cell fate pattern. Analysis reveals a range of parameter space conducive to optimal reproducibility and information content, yet susceptible to noise levels, demonstrating graded vs. bistable dynamics' relative advantages.

In the second model, the concept of cell-type proportioning is examined, wherein an ideal state is characterized by a specific distribution of cell types. The model's efficacy is demonstrated by its ability to consistently achieve these proportions despite stochastic variations and external noise, revealing that optimizing for CI can stabilize proportions even when PI is low.

The paper's final exemplar, reaction-diffusion systems, leverages activator-inhibitor interactions to pattern cell fates. Intrinsic noise and extrinsic variability are examined, with supplemental regulatory expansions such as fast-diffusing species suggested to bolster the system's robustness against spatial variances.

The proposed framework holds significant implications for understanding and engineering developmental systems. In addition to optimizing existing biological processes, it proposes a pathway for synthetic biology applications aiming to design systems with robust patterning capabilities. By aligning theoretical measures with experimental data, future work could further quantify developmental mechanisms, providing a standardized classification across different biological systems based on information content. This work serves as a foundation for integrating statistical descriptions into the complex choreography of cellular self-organization, offering insights into potential evolutionary advantages of specific regulatory motifs in developmental biology.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 90 likes about this paper.