Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Role of initial transverse momentum in a hybrid approach

Published 8 Dec 2023 in nucl-th, hep-ph, and nucl-ex | (2312.05001v1)

Abstract: The purpose of this work is to study the effect of exchanging initial condition models in a modular hybrid approach. The focus lies on the event-by-event correlations of elliptic and triangular flow. This study is performed in the hybrid approach SMASH-vHLLE, composed of the hadronic transport approach SMASH and the (3+1)d viscous hydrodynamic code vHLLE. The initial condition models investigated are SMASH IC, Trento and IP-Glasma. Correlations are calculated on an event-by-event basis between the eccentricities and momentum anisotropies of the initial state as well as the momentum anisotropies in the final state, both for ultra-central and off-central collisions for AuAu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. This work demonstrates that, although averaged values for the eccentricities of these models are very similar, substantial differences exist both in the distributions of eccentricities, the correlations amongst the initial state properties as well as in the correlations between initial state and final state properties. Notably, whereas initial state momentum anisotropy is shown to not affect the final state flow, the presence of radial flow affects the emergence of final state momentum anisotropies. Inclusion of radial flow in the linear fit improves the prediction of final state flow from initial state properties. The presence of momentum in the initial state has an effect on the emergence of flow and is therefore a relevant part of initial state models, challenging the common understanding of final state momentum anisotropies being a linear response to initial state eccentricity only.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 252301 (2011), arXiv:1105.3928 [nucl-ex] .
  2. J. Adams et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 72, 014904 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0409033 .
  3. H. Elfner and B. Müller,   (2022), arXiv:2210.12056 [nucl-th] .
  4. L. Du and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251, 107090 (2020).
  5. H. Petersen, J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 124005 (2014).
  6. C. Greiner, J. Noronha-Hostler,  and J. Noronha, “Hagedorn states and thermalization in heavy ion collisions,”  (2011), arXiv:1105.1756 [nucl-th] .
  7. H. Kowalski and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114005 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0304189 .
  8. H.-J. Drescher and Y. Nara, Physical Review C 75 (2007), 10.1103/physrevc.75.034905.
  9. A. Accardi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016), arXiv:1212.1701 [nucl-ex] .
  10. W. van der Schee and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. C 92, 064907 (2015), arXiv:1507.08195 [nucl-th] .
  11. https://github.com/smash-transport/smash-vhlle-hybrid.
  12. D. Oliinychenko, V. Steinberg, J. Staudenmaier, J. Weil, A. Schäfer, H. E. (Petersen), S. Ryu, J. Mohs, F. Li, A. Sorensen, D. Mitrovic, L. Pang, void 0ne, A. Sciarra, O. Garcia-Montero, M. Mayer, N. Kübler,  and Nikita, “smash-transport/smash: SMASH-2.1,”  (2021).
  13. https://smash-transport.github.io/.
  14. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  15. P. Huovinen and H. Petersen, Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (2012), 10.1140/epja/i2012-12171-9.
  16. N. Götz and H. Elfner, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054904 (2022), arXiv:2207.05778 [hep-ph] .
  17. https://github.com/smash-transport/smash-hadron-sampler.
  18. D. Oliinychenko and H. Petersen, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034905 (2016), arXiv:1508.04378 [nucl-th] .
  19. G. Inghirami and H. Elfner,   (2022), arXiv:2201.05934 [hep-ph] .
  20. J. Auvinen and H. Petersen, Phys. Rev. C 88, 064908 (2013), arXiv:1310.1764 [nucl-th] .
  21. D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Phys. Rev. C 106, 064901 (2022), arXiv:2203.08286 [hep-ph] .
  22. A. Krasnitz and R. Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. B 557, 237 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9809433 .
  23. C. Adler et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 66, 034904 (2002), arXiv:nucl-ex/0206001 .
  24. H. Roch, N. Saß,  and N. Götz, “smash-transport/sparkx: v1.1.0-newton,”  (2023).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.