Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Critical behavior of lattice gauge theory Rydberg simulators from effective Hamiltonians

Published 7 Dec 2023 in quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, and hep-lat | (2312.04436v2)

Abstract: We consider multileg ladders of Rydberg atoms which have been proposed as quantum simulators for the compact Abelian Higgs model (CAHM) in 1+1 dimensions [Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094513 (2021)] and modified versions of theses simulators such as triangular prisms. Starting with the physical Hamiltonian for the analog simulator, we construct translation-invariant effective Hamiltonians by integrating over the simulator high-energy states produced by the blockade mechanism when some of the atoms are sufficiently close to each others. Remarkably, for all the simulators considered, the effective Hamiltonians have the three types of terms present for the CAHM (Electric field, matter charge and currents energies) but, in addition, terms quartic in the electric field. For the two leg ladder, these additional terms cannot be removed by fine-tuning the adjustable parameters of currently available devices. For positive detuning, the new terms create highly-degenerate vacua resulting in a very interesting phase diagram. Using numerical methods, we demonstrate the close correspondence between the physical simulator and the effective description for the ground state energy and real-time evolution. We discuss the phase diagram at fixed geometry with variable Rabi frequency and detuning and show that a rich variety of phases can be reached with potential interest in the context of QCD at finite density. We illustrate how the effective description can be used to design simulators with desirable properties from the point of view of constructing hybrid event generators.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Contemp. Phys. 57, 388 (2016), arXiv:1602.03776 [cond-mat.quant-gas] .
  2. M. C. Bañuls et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165 (2020), arXiv:1911.00003 [quant-ph] .
  3. C. W. Bauer et al., PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023), arXiv:2204.03381 [quant-ph] .
  4. A. Keesling et al., Nature 568, 207 (2019), arXiv:1809.05540 [quant-ph] .
  5. A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Nature Phys. 16, 132 (2020).
  6. “Quera,” https://www.quera.com.
  7. “Pasqal,” https://www.pasqal.com.
  8. Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094513 (2021), arXiv:2107.11366 [quant-ph] .
  9. N. Šibalić and C. S. Adams, Rydberg Physics, 2399-2891 (IOP Publishing, 2018).
  10. “Amazon braket,” https://aws.amazon.com/braket.
  11. G. Basar and G. V. Dunne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200404 (2008), arXiv:0803.1501 [hep-th] .
  12. E. Gustafson, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114505 (2021), arXiv:2104.10136 [quant-ph] .
  13. E. Gustafson,   (2022), arXiv:2201.04546 [quant-ph] .
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.