Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Integrability, multifractality, and two-photon dynamics in disordered Tavis-Cummings models

Published 6 Dec 2023 in cond-mat.dis-nn, nlin.SI, physics.optics, and quant-ph | (2312.03833v1)

Abstract: The Tavis-Cummings model is a paradigmatic central-mode model where a set of two-level quantum emitters (spins) are coupled to a collective cavity mode. Here we study the eigenstate spectrum, its localization properties and the effect on dynamics, focusing on the two-excitation sector relevant for nonlinear photonics. These models admit two sources of disorder: in the coupling between the spins and the cavity and in the energy shifts of the individual spins. While this model was known to be exactly solvable in the limit of a homogeneous coupling and inhomogeneous energy shifts, we here establish the solvability in the opposite limit of a homogeneous energy shift and inhomogeneous coupling, presenting the exact solution and corresponding conserved quantities. We identify three different classes of eigenstates, exhibiting different degrees of multifractality and semilocalization closely tied to the integrable points, and study their stability to perturbations away from these solvable points. The dynamics of the cavity occupation number away from equilibrium, exhibiting boson bunching and a two-photon blockade, is explicitly related to the localization properties of the eigenstates and illustrates how these models support a collective spin description despite the presence of disorder.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. G. Engelhardt and J. Cao, Polariton Localization and Dispersion Properties of Disordered Quantum Emitters in Multimode Microcavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 213602 (2023).
  2. M. Gaudin, The Bethe Wavefunction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014) Translated by J.-S. Caux.
  3. J. Dukelsky, S. Pittel, and G. Sierra, Colloquium: Exactly solvable Richardson-Gaudin models for many-body quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 643 (2004b).
  4. P. W. Claeys, Richardson-Gaudin models and broken integrability (2018), arXiv:1809.04447.
  5. F. Buccheri, A. De Luca, and A. Scardicchio, Structure of typical states of a disordered Richardson model and many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094203 (2011).
  6. M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, Exact Solution for an N𝑁{N}italic_N-Molecule-Radiation-Field Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. 170, 379 (1968).
  7. G. Grynberg, A. Aspect, and C. Fabre, Introduction to Quantum Optics From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. (Cambridge University Press, Leiden, 2010).
  8. E. Jaynes and F. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proceedings of the IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
  9. M. Kac and C. J. Thompson, Critical Behavior of Several Lattice Models with Long-Range Interaction, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1373 (1969).
  10. D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photon 8, 685 (2014).
  11. J. Taylor, C. Marcus, and M. Lukin, Long-lived memory for mesoscopic quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 206803 (2003a).
  12. J. M. Taylor, A. Imamoglu, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling a mesoscopic spin environment by quantum bit manipulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246802 (2003b).
  13. T. Villazon, A. Chandran, and P. W. Claeys, Integrability and dark states in an anisotropic central spin model, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032052 (2020).
  14. N. Wu, X.-W. Guan, and J. Links, Separable and entangled states in the high-spin XX central spin model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155145 (2020).
  15. C. Dimo and A. Faribault, Strong-coupling emergence of dark states in XX central spin models, Phys. Rev. B 105, L121404 (2022).
  16. J. van Tonder and J. Links, Supersymmetry and integrability for a class of XY central spin models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 47LT01 (2023).
  17. D. J. Rowe, Nuclear collective motion : models and theory (London: Methuen, 1970).
  18. S. De Baerdemacker, Richardson-Gaudin integrability in the contraction limit of the quasispin, Phys. Rev. C 86, 044332 (2012).
  19. T. Mori, Prethermalization in the transverse-field Ising chain with long-range interactions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 054001 (2019).
  20. Z. Qi, T. Scaffidi, and X. Cao, Surprises in the deep Hilbert space of all-to-all systems: From superexponential scrambling to slow entanglement growth, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054301 (2023).
  21. O. Babelon and D. Talalaev, On the Bethe Ansatz for the Jaynes-Cummings-Gaudin model, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2007 (06), P06013.
  22. O. Tsyplyatyev, J. Von Delft, and D. Loss, Simplified derivation of the Bethe-ansatz equations for the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 092203 (2010).
  23. H. Tschirhart and A. Faribault, Algebraic Bethe ansätze and eigenvalue-based determinants for Dicke-Jaynes-Cummings-Gaudin quantum integrable models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 405204 (2014).
  24. T. V. Skrypnyk, “Twisted” rational r-matrices and the algebraic Bethe ansatz: Applications to generalized Gaudin models, Bose–Hubbard dimers, and Jaynes–Cummings–Dicke-type models, Theor. Math. Phys. 189, 1509 (2016).
  25. T. Skrypnyk, Generalized n-level Jaynes–Cummings and Dicke models, classical rational r-matrices and algebraic Bethe ansatz, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 475202 (2008).
  26. C. Sträter, O. Tsyplyatyev, and A. Faribault, Nonequilibrum dynamics in the strongly excited inhomogeneous Dicke model, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195101 (2012).
  27. F. Wegner, Inverse Participation Ratio in 2 + ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ Dimensions, Z. Physik B 36, 209 (1980).
  28. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Fluctuations of the Inverse Participation Ratio at the Anderson Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3690 (2000).
  29. C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).
  30. H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon Antibunching in Resonance Fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691 (1977), publisher: American Physical Society.
  31. M. Bortz and J. Stolze, Exact dynamics in the inhomogeneous central-spin model, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014304 (2007).
  32. A. Faribault, P. Calabrese, and J.-S. Caux, Quantum quenches from integrability: the fermionic pairing model, J. Stat. Mech. 2009, P03018 (2009).
  33. A. Faribault and D. Schuricht, Integrability-Based Analysis of the Hyperfine-Interaction-Induced Decoherence in Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040405 (2013).
  34. D. A. Rowlands and A. Lamacraft, Noisy Spins and the Richardson-Gaudin Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 090401 (2018).
  35. P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Dissipative dynamics in open XXZ Richardson-Gaudin models, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013033 (2022).
  36. S. M. A. Rombouts, J. Dukelsky, and G. Ortiz, Quantum phase diagram of the integrable px+i⁢pysubscript𝑝𝑥𝑖subscript𝑝𝑦p_{x}+ip_{y}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_i italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fermionic superfluid, Phys. Rev. B 82, 224510 (2010).
  37. I. Lukyanenko, P. S. Isaac, and J. Links, An integrable case of the p+i⁢p𝑝𝑖𝑝p+ipitalic_p + italic_i italic_p pairing Hamiltonian interacting with its environment, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 084001 (2016).
  38. N. M. Bogolyubov, Algebraic Bethe Ansatz and the Tavis-Cummings model, J. Math. Sci. 100, 2051 (2000).
  39. T. Skrypnyk, Integrable quantum spin chains, non-skew symmetric r-matrices and quasigraded lie algebras, J. Geom. Phys. 57, 53 (2006).
  40. T. Skrypnyk, Generalized gaudin systems in a magnetic field and non-skew-symmetric r-matrices, J. Phys. Math. Theor. 40, 13337 (2007).
  41. T. Skrypnyk, Non-skew-symmetric classical r-matrices and integrable cases of the reduced BCS model, J. Phys. Math. Theor. 42, 472004 (2009b).
  42. I. Lukyanenko, P. S. Isaac, and J. Links, On the boundaries of quantum integrability for the spin-1/2 Richardson–Gaudin system, Nucl. Phys. B 886, 364 (2014).
  43. J. Dukelsky, C. Esebbag, and P. Schuck, Class of exactly solvable pairing models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 066403 (2001).
  44. M. Van Raemdonck, S. De Baerdemacker, and D. Van Neck, Exact solution of the px+i⁢pysubscript𝑝𝑥𝑖subscript𝑝𝑦p_{x}+ip_{y}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_i italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT pairing Hamiltonian by deforming the pairing algebra, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155136 (2014).
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free