Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

QCD sum rule studies on the possible double-peak structure of the $X17$ particle

Published 5 Dec 2023 in hep-ph | (2312.02763v2)

Abstract: The $X17$ particle, discovered by Krasznahorkay et al. at ATOMKI, was recently confirmed in the $\gamma \gamma$ invariant mass spectra by Abraamyan et al. at JINR. We notice with surprise and interest that the $X17$ seems to have a double-peak structure. This is in a possible coincidence with our QCD sum rule study of [arXiv:2006.01018], where we interpreted the $X17$ as a tetraquark state composed of four bare quarks ($u \bar u d \bar d$), and claimed that ``A unique feature of this tetraquark assignment is that we predict two almost degenerate states with significantly different widths''. These two different tetraquark states are described by two different chiral tetraquark currents $\bar u_L \gamma_\mu d_L~\bar d_L \gamma\mu u_L$ and $\bar u_L \gamma_\mu d_L~\bar d_R \gamma\mu u_R$. To verify whether the tetraquark assignment is correct or not, we replace the up and down quarks by the strange quarks, and apply the QCD sum rule method to study the other four chiral tetraquark currents $\bar u_L \gamma_\mu s_L~\bar s_L \gamma\mu u_L$, $\bar u_L \gamma_\mu s_L~\bar s_R \gamma\mu u_R$, $\bar d_L \gamma_\mu s_L~\bar s_L \gamma\mu d_L$, and $\bar d_L \gamma_\mu s_L~\bar s_R \gamma\mu d_R$. We calculate their correlation functions, and find that non-perturbative QCD effects do not contribute much to them. Our results suggest that there may exist four almost degenerate tetraquark states with masses about $236\sim296$ MeV. Each of these states is composed of four bare quarks, either $u \bar u s \bar s$ or $d \bar d s \bar s$.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. arXiv:1504.01527, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.042501.
  2. H.-X. Chen, Is the X⁢17𝑋17X17italic_X 17 composed of four bare quarks?arXiv:2006.01018.
  3. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097.
  4. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201713708010.
  5. arXiv:2209.10795, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L061601.
  6. arXiv:1604.07411, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.071803.
  7. arXiv:1608.03591, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.035017.
  8. arXiv:1606.05171, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.03.023.
  9. arXiv:1609.09072, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)002.
  10. arXiv:1611.05357, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4568-9.
  11. arXiv:1707.01503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.075036.
  12. arXiv:1607.08309, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/063105.
  13. arXiv:1608.05443, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4561-3.
  14. arXiv:1609.01669, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)039.
  15. arXiv:1612.01525, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.115024.
  16. arXiv:1705.06726, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141803.
  17. arXiv:2005.00028, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)235.
  18. arXiv:1703.04588, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.013.
  19. arXiv:2004.09758, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac09db.
  20. arXiv:1708.00443, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)044.
  21. arXiv:1710.03764, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)092.
  22. arXiv:2002.07496, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.095024.
  23. arXiv:2004.04469, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.055018.
  24. arXiv:2001.04864, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2020)165.
  25. arXiv:2212.06453, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)154.
  26. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11271-x.
  27. arXiv:hep-ph/0604049, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.054001.
  28. arXiv:0707.4586, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.094025.
  29. arXiv:2003.07670, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8340-9.
  30. arXiv:1401.4801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.054028.
  31. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1.
  32. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90065-1.
  33. arXiv:hep-ph/9804377, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116005.
  34. arXiv:hep-ph/0201174, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01951-2.
  35. arXiv:hep-ph/0207183, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2002-01099-8.
  36. arXiv:hep-lat/0503001, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02250-9.
  37. arXiv:1703.03751, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.11.014.
  38. arXiv:1801.00592, doi:10.1142/S0217751X18500458.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.