Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Shear at the Common Dynamical Horizon in Binary Black Hole Mergers and its Imprint in their Gravitational Radiation

Published 2 Dec 2023 in gr-qc | (2312.01136v1)

Abstract: We study the correlation between a part of the gravitational field at the common dynamical horizon in the strong field regime and the news of the gravitational radiation received from the system in the weak field regime, in the post-merger phase of quasi-circular, non-spinning binary black hole mergers using numerical relativity simulations. We find that, as in the inspiral phase Phys.Rev.Lett.125,121101, the shear of the common dynamical horizon formed late into the inspiral continues to be well correlated with the news of the outgoing gravitational radiation even at early times. We show by fitting that the shear contains certain quasi-normal frequencies and information about the masses and spins of the remnant and the parent black holes, providing evidence to support the horizon correlation conjecture holds for dynamical horizons in binary black hole mergers.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016a), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] .
  2. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE] .
  3. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016b), [erratum: Phys. Rev.X8,no.3,039903(2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc] .
  4. B. P. Abbott et al., “Gwtc-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run,”  (2021a), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc] .
  5. B. P. Abbott et al., “Search for subsolar-mass binaries in the first half of advanced ligo and virgo’s third observing run,”  (2021b), arXiv:2109.12197 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. R. Geroch and G. T. Horowtiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 203 (1978).
  7. M. Gadioux and H. S. Reall, “Creases, corners and caustics: properties of non-smooth structures on black hole horizons,”  (2023), arXiv:2303.15512 [gr-qc] .
  8. A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Living Rev. Rel. 7, 10 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407042 .
  9. F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005a), arXiv:gr-qc/0507014 .
  10. EinsteinToolkit, “Einstein Toolkit: Open software for relativistic astrophysics,” http://einsteintoolkit.org/.
  11. S. Brandt and B. Brügmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3606 (1997).
  12. J. Thornburg, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4899 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9508014 .
  13. J. Thornburg, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 743 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0306056 .
  14. V. Prasad, “waveformtools,”  (2023).
  15. B. Wardell, I. Hinder,  and E. Bentivegna, “Simulation of GW150914 binary black hole merger using the Einstein Toolkit,”  (2016), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155394.
  16. RITcatalog, “RIT Catalog for Numerical Simulations,” https://ccrg.rit.edu/~RITCatalog/.
  17. A. Ashtekar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3564 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0006006 .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.