Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Odor Intensity Shift Keying (OISK) and Channel Capacity of Odor-based Molecular Communications in Internet of Everything

Published 30 Nov 2023 in cs.ET | (2311.18170v1)

Abstract: Molecular communication is a new, active area of research that has created a paradigm shift in the way a communication system is perceived. An artificial molecular communication network is created using biological molecules for encoding, transmitting and decoding the symbols to convey information. In addition to typical biological molecules, we are also exploring other classes of molecules that possess unique distinctive features which can be potentially exploited for establishing reliable communications. Odor molecules are one such class of molecules which possess several distinctive features such as Intensity, Headonic tone which provides a basis to convey the information in an olfactory communication system. In our work, we investigate the ICT (information and communication theory) perspective of the olfactory communications by evaluating the channel capacity of an odor molecular communication (OMC) system with the help of a novel modulation scheme viz. odor intensity shift keying (OISK), where information is being conveyed from the intensity level of an odor. Furthermore, we also analyse the effects of critical parameters like temperature and noise on the achievable channel capacity to provide an insight about the resilience of the proposed OMC system towards any such anomaly faced by it.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. D. Aktas, B. E. Ortlek, M. Civas, E. Baradari, A. S. Okcu, M. Whitfield, O. Cetinkaya, and O. B. Akan, “Odor communications: State-of-the-art, vision, challenges, and frontier directions,” Unpublished Manuscript, (2023 in progress).
  2. M. Kuscu, E. Dinc, B. A. Bilgin, H. Ramezani, and O. B. Akan, “Transmitter and receiver architectures for molecular communications: A survey on physical design with modulation, coding, and detection techniques,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1302–1341, 2019.
  3. X. Guo, X. Dong, G. Zou, H. Gao, and W. Zhai, “Strong and tough fibrous hydrogels reinforced by multiscale hierarchical structures with multimechanisms,” Science Advances, vol. 9, no. 2, p. eadf7075, 2023.
  4. C. Nguyen et al., “Biocompatible nanomaterials based on dendrimers, hydrogels and hydrogel nanocomposites for use in biomedicine,” Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 015001, feb 2017.
  5. J. A. Covington, S. Marco, K. C. Persaud, S. S. Schiffman, and H. T. Nagle, “Artificial olfaction in the 21st century,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 12 969–12 990, 2021.
  6. M. Civas, M. Kuscu, O. Cetinkaya, B. E. Ortlek, and O. B. Akan, “Graphene and related materials for the internet of bio-nano things,” arXiv preprint arXiv:23.04.03824, 2023.
  7. M. Civas and O. B. Akan, “Molecular communication transmitter architectures for the internet of bio-nano things,” in 2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom), 2022, pp. 132–136.
  8. M. Bartunik et al., “Novel receiver for superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in a molecular communication setting,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication, 2019.
  9. D. T. Mcguiness, S. Giannoukos, S. Taylor, and A. Marshall, “Experimental and analytical analysis of macro-scale molecular communications within closed boundaries,” IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2019.
  10. D. T. McGuiness, S. Giannoukos, A. Marshall, and S. Taylor, “Experimental results on the open-air transmission of macro-molecular communication using membrane inlet mass spectrometry,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2567–2570, 2018.
  11. D. T. Mcguiness, S. Giannoukos, A. Marshall, and S. Taylor, “Modulation analysis in macro-molecular communications,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 11 049–11 065, 2019.
  12. N. Farsad et al., “Tabletop molecular communication: Text messages through chemical signals,” PloS one, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 282935, 2013.
  13. B. H. Koo, C. Lee, H. B. Yilmaz, N. Farsad, A. Eckford, and C.-B. Chae, “Molecular mimo: From theory to prototype,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 600–614, 2016.
  14. M. Kuscu et al., “Fabrication and microfluidic analysis of graphene-based molecular communication receiver for internet of nano things (iont).” vol. 11, no. 1, p. 19600, 2021.
  15. M. Kuscu and O. B. Akan, “Modeling and analysis of sinw biofet as molecular antenna for bio-cyber interfaces towards the internet of bio-nanothings,” in 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2015, pp. 669–674.
  16. ——, “On the physical design of molecular communication receiver based on nanoscale biosensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2228–2243, 2016.
  17. ——, “Modeling and analysis of sinw fet-based molecular communication receiver,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3708–3721, 2016.
  18. D. Aktas and O. B. Akan, “Weight shift keying (wsk) with practical mechanical receivers for molecular communications in internet of everything,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3285–3294, 2022.
  19. ——, “A mechanical transduction-based molecular communication receiver for internet of nano things (iont),” in Proceedings of the Eight Annual ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3477206.3477453
  20. T. Khan, M. Civas, O. Cetinkaya, N. A. Abbasi, and O. B. Akan, “Chapter 23 - nanosensor networks for smart health care,” in Nanosensors for Smart Cities, ser. Micro and Nano Technologies.   Elsevier, 2020, pp. 387–403.
  21. S. Li, “Recent developments in human odor detection technologies,” Journal of Forensic Science and Criminology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.
  22. O. B. Akan, E. Dinc, M. Kuscu, O. Cetinkaya, and B. A. Bilgin, “Internet of everything (ioe) - from molecules to the universe,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 122–128, 2023.
  23. B. A. Egan and J. R. Mahoney, “Numerical modeling of advection and diffusion of urban area source pollutants,” Journal of Applied Meteorology (1962-1982), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 312–322, 1972. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26175487
  24. D. of Environmental Quality, “Vdi 3882 blatt:1 olfactometry and determination of odor intensity,” Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure Standards Committee, 1992.
  25. C. Wu, J. Liu, P. Zhao, M. Piringer, and G. Schauberger, “Conversion of the chemical concentration of odorous mixtures into odour concentration and odour intensity: A comparison of methods.” Atmospheric Environment, 2016.
  26. J. Jiang, P. Coffey, and T. B., “Improvement of odor intensity measurement using dynamic olfactometry.” Air Waste Manag. Assoc., vol. 56, pp. 675–683.
  27. M. J. Tang, M. Shiraiwa, U. Pöschl, R. Cox, and M. Kalberer1, “Compilation and evaluation of gas phase diffusion coefficients of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere: Volume 2. diffusivities of organic compounds, pressure-normalised mean free paths, and average knudsen numbers for gas uptake calculations,” Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 15, p. 5585–5598, 2015.
  28. I. Nagata and T. Hasegawa, “Gaseous interdiffusion coefficients,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, vol. 3, pp. 143–145, 1970. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:96025255
  29. C. Y. Lee and C. R. Wilke, “Measurements of vapor diffusion coefficient,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 46, pp. 2381–2387, 1954. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:94842346
  30. A. P. Altshuller and I. R. Cohen, “Application of diffusion cells to production of known concentration of gaseous hydrocarbons,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 32, pp. 802–810, 1960. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:97051737
  31. G. Lugg, “Diffusion coefficients of some organic and other vapors in air,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 40, pp. 1072–1077, 1968. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:96551546
  32. M. Naudin and B. Atanasova, “Olfactory markers of depression and alzheimer’s disease,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 262–270, 2014.
  33. K. D. Suh et al., “Olfactory function test for early diagnosis of vascular dementia,” Korean Journal of Family Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 202, 2020.
  34. M. Mustapha and C. N. M. Taib, “Mptp-induced mouse model of parkinson’s disease: A promising direction for therapeutic strategies,” Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 422, 2021.
  35. O. Troisi, M. Kashef, and A. Visvizi, “Managing safety and security in the smart city: Covid-19, emergencies and smart surveillance,” Springer, pp. 73–88, 2022.
  36. T. D. Toth, “Engineering plant-microbe communication for synthetic symbioses,” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2022.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.