Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Local certification of geometric graph classes

Published 28 Nov 2023 in cs.DM, cs.CG, cs.DC, and math.CO | (2311.16953v4)

Abstract: The goal of local certification is to locally convince the vertices of a graph $G$ that $G$ satisfies a given property. A prover assigns short certificates to the vertices of the graph, then the vertices are allowed to check their certificates and the certificates of their neighbors, and based only on this local view, they must decide whether $G$ satisfies the given property. If the graph indeed satisfies the property, all vertices must accept the instance, and otherwise at least one vertex must reject the instance (for any possible assignment of certificates). The goal is to minimize the size of the certificates. In this paper we study the local certification of geometric and topological graph classes. While it is known that in $n$-vertex graphs, planarity can be certified locally with certificates of size $O(\log n)$, we show that several closely related graph classes require certificates of size $\Omega(n)$. This includes penny graphs, unit-distance graphs, (induced) subgraphs of the square grid, 1-planar graphs, and unit-square graphs. These bounds are tight up to a constant factor and give the first known examples of hereditary (and even monotone) graph classes for which the certificates must have linear size. For unit-disk graphs we obtain a lower bound of $\Omega(n{1-\delta})$ for any $\delta>0$ on the size of the certificates, and an upper bound of $O(n \log n)$. The lower bounds are obtained by proving rigidity properties of the considered graphs, which might be of independent interest.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Two notions of unit distance graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 125:1–17, 2014.
  2. Twin-width II: small classes. Combinatorial Theory, 2(2):#10, 2022.
  3. Local certification of graph decompositions and applications to minor-free classes. In Quentin Bramas, Vincent Gramoli, and Alessia Milani, editors, 25th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems, OPODIS 2021, December 13-15, 2021, Strasbourg, France, volume 217 of LIPIcs, pages 22:1–22:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fĂ¼r Informatik, 2021.
  4. Approximate proof-labeling schemes. Theoretical Computer Science, 811:112–124, 2020.
  5. Trade-offs in distributed interactive proofs. In Jukka Suomela, editor, 33rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing, DISC 2019, October 14-18, 2019, Budapest, Hungary, volume 146 of LIPIcs, pages 13:1–13:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fĂ¼r Informatik, 2019.
  6. Local certification of graphs on surfaces. Theoretical Computer Science, 909:68–75, 2022.
  7. Laurent Feuilloley. Introduction to local certification. Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, 23(3), 2021.
  8. What can be certified compactly? Compact local certification of MSO properties in tree-like graphs. In Alessia Milani and Philipp Woelfel, editors, PODC ’22: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Salerno, Italy, July 25 - 29, 2022, pages 131–140. ACM, 2022.
  9. Compact distributed certification of planar graphs. Algorithmica, 83(7):2215–2244, 2021.
  10. Local certification of graphs with bounded genus. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 325:9–36, 2023.
  11. Distributed certification for classes of dense graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14292, 2023.
  12. A meta-theorem for distributed certification. In Merav Parter, editor, Structural Information and Communication Complexity - 29th International Colloquium, SIROCCO 2022, Paderborn, Germany, June 27-29, 2022, Proceedings, volume 13298 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 116–134. Springer, 2022.
  13. Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing. Theory of Computing, 12(1):1–33, 2016.
  14. Local certification of some geometric intersection graph classes. CoRR, abs/2309.04789, 2023.
  15. Distributed interactive proofs for the recognition of some geometric intersection graph classes. In Merav Parter, editor, Structural Information and Communication Complexity - 29th International Colloquium, SIROCCO 2022, Paderborn, Germany, June 27-29, 2022, Proceedings, volume 13298 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 212–233. Springer, 2022.
  16. Interactive distributed proofs. In Calvin Newport and Idit Keidar, editors, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 2018, Egham, United Kingdom, July 23-27, 2018, pages 255–264. ACM, 2018.
  17. Proof labeling schemes. Distributed Computing, 22(4):215–233, 2010.
  18. Vladimir P. Korzhik. Minimal non-1-planar graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 308(7):1319–1327, 2008.
  19. LĂ¡szlĂ³ LovĂ¡sz. Communication complexity: A survey. Forschungsinst. fĂ¼r Diskrete Mathematik. Inst. fĂ¼r Ă–konometrie u. Operations, 1989.
  20. The number of disk graphs. European Journal of Combinatorics, 35:413–431, 2014. Selected Papers of EuroComb’11.
  21. The power of distributed verifiers in interactive proofs. In Shuchi Chawla, editor, Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2020, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, January 5-8, 2020, pages 1096–115. SIAM, 2020.
  22. Jaroslav Nešetřil and Patrice Ossona De Mendez. Sparsity: graphs, structures, and algorithms, volume 28. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  23. Graph minors. XX. Wagner’s conjecture. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 92(2):325–357, 2004.
  24. Hassler Whitney. 2-isomorphic graphs. American Journal of Mathematics, 55(1):245–254, 1933.
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.