Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

New Developments in the Numerical Conformal Bootstrap

Published 27 Nov 2023 in hep-th and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2311.15844v3)

Abstract: The numerical conformal bootstrap has become in the last 15 years an indispensable tool for studying strongly coupled CFTs in various dimensions. Here we review the main developments in the field in the last 5 years, since the appearance of the previous comprehensive review \cite{Poland:2018epd}. We describe developments in the software ({\tt SDPB 2.0}, {\tt scalar_blocks}, {\tt blocks_3d}, {\tt autoboot}, {\tt hyperion}, {\tt simpleboot}), and on the algorithmic side (Delauney triangulation, cutting surface, tiptop, navigator function, skydive). We also describe the main physics applications which were obtained using the new technology.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (191)
  1. D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, “The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 no. 1, (2019) 15002, arXiv:1805.04405 [hep-th].
  2. R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, “Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,” JHEP 0812 (2008) 031, arXiv:0807.0004 [hep-th].
  3. D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Snowmass White Paper: The Numerical Conformal Bootstrap,” in Snowmass 2021. arXiv:2203.08117 [hep-th].
  4. W. Landry and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Scaling the semidefinite program solver SDPB,” arXiv:1909.09745 [hep-th].
  5. D. Simmons-Duffin, “A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap,” JHEP 06 (2015) 174, arXiv:1502.02033 [hep-th].
  6. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 025022, arXiv:1203.6064 [hep-th].
  7. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents,” J. Stat. Phys. 157 (2014) 869, arXiv:1403.4545 [hep-th].
  8. C. Behan, P. Kravchuk, W. Landry, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “scalar_blocks,” 2019. https://gitlab.com/bootstrapcollaboration/scalar_blocks.
  9. R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, and P. Kravchuk, “Recursion relation for general 3d blocks,” JHEP 12 (2019) 116, arXiv:1907.11247 [hep-th].
  10. R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, W. Landry, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “blocks_3d: software for general 3d conformal blocks,” JHEP 11 (2021) 006, arXiv:2011.01959 [hep-th].
  11. D. Simmons-Duffin. https://github.com/davidsd/hyperion.
  12. N. Su. https://gitlab.com/bootstrapcollaboration/simpleboot.
  13. M. F. Paulos, “JuliBootS: a hands-on guide to the conformal bootstrap,” arXiv:1412.4127 [hep-th].
  14. C. Behan, “PyCFTBoot: A flexible interface for the conformal bootstrap,” Commun. Comput. Phys. 22 no. 1, (2017) 1–38, arXiv:1602.02810 [hep-th].
  15. T. Ohtsuki. https://github.com/tohtsky/cboot.
  16. M. Go and Y. Tachikawa, “autoboot: A generator of bootstrap equations with global symmetry,” JHEP 06 (2019) 084, arXiv:1903.10522 [hep-th].
  17. M. Go, “An Automated Generation of Bootstrap Equations for Numerical Study of Critical Phenomena,” arXiv:2006.04173 [hep-th].
  18. F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model,” JHEP 11 (2014) 109, arXiv:1406.4858 [hep-th].
  19. T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, “Emergent Space-Time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase,” Science 344 no. 6181, (2014) 280–283, arXiv:1301.7449 [cond-mat.str-el].
  20. D. Bashkirov, “Bootstrapping the 𝒩=1𝒩1\mathcal{N}=1caligraphic_N = 1 SCFT in three dimensions,” arXiv:1310.8255 [hep-th].
  21. L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S. S. Pufu, D. Simmons-Duffin, and R. Yacoby, “Bootstrapping 3D Fermions,” JHEP 03 (2016) 120, arXiv:1508.00012 [hep-th].
  22. J. Rong and N. Su, “Bootstrapping the minimal 𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N = 1 superconformal field theory in three dimensions,” JHEP 06 (2021) 154, arXiv:1807.04434 [hep-th].
  23. A. Atanasov, A. Hillman, and D. Poland, “Bootstrapping the Minimal 3D SCFT,” JHEP 11 (2018) 140, arXiv:1807.05702 [hep-th].
  24. N. Zerf, L. N. Mihaila, P. Marquard, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, “Four-loop critical exponents for the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa models,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 9, (2017) 096010, arXiv:1709.05057 [hep-th].
  25. J. Rong and N. Su, “Bootstrapping the 𝒩=1𝒩1\mathcal{N}=1caligraphic_N = 1 Wess-Zumino models in three dimensions,” arXiv:1910.08578 [hep-th].
  26. A. Atanasov, A. Hillman, D. Poland, J. Rong, and N. Su, “Precision bootstrap for the 𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N = 1 super-Ising model,” JHEP 08 (2022) 136, arXiv:2201.02206 [hep-th].
  27. S. Gukov, “RG Flows and Bifurcations,” Nucl. Phys. B 919 (2017) 583–638, arXiv:1608.06638 [hep-th].
  28. T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Deconfined Quantum Critical Points,” Science 303 no. 5663, (2004) 1490–1494, arXiv:cond-mat/0311326.
  29. T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Quantum criticality beyond the landau-ginzburg-wilson paradigm,” Phys. Rev. B 70 (Oct, 2004) 144407. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.144407.
  30. M. Hermele, T. Senthil, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Algebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders,” Physical Review B 72 no. 10, (2005) .
  31. X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, “From spinon band topology to the symmetry quantum numbers of monopoles in Dirac spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. X 10 no. 1, (2020) 011033, arXiv:1811.11182 [cond-mat.str-el].
  32. X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, “Unifying Description of Competing Orders in Two Dimensional Quantum Magnets,” Nature Commun. 10 no. 1, (2019) 4254, arXiv:1811.11186 [cond-mat.str-el].
  33. S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu, “Towards bootstrapping QED33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT,” JHEP 08 (2016) 019, arXiv:1601.03476 [hep-th].
  34. S. M. Chester, L. V. Iliesiu, M. Mezei, and S. S. Pufu, “Monopole Operators in U⁢(1)𝑈1U(1)italic_U ( 1 ) Chern-Simons-Matter Theories,” JHEP 05 (2018) 157, arXiv:1710.00654 [hep-th].
  35. Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, “Conformal Bootstrap Dashing Hopes of Emergent Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 13, (2016) 131601, arXiv:1602.07295 [cond-mat.str-el].
  36. L. Iliesiu, “Talk at Simons Center for Geometry and Physics: Bootstrapping the Néel-VBS quantum phase transition,” November, 2018.
  37. Z. Li, “Conformality and self-duality of Nf=2subscript𝑁𝑓2N_{f}=2italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 QED33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT,” Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022) 137192, arXiv:2107.09020 [hep-th].
  38. Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, “Signatures of Dirac Cones in a DMRG Study of the Kagome Heisenberg Model,” Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 031020.
  39. S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, “Dirac Spin Liquid on the Spin-1 /2 Triangular Heisenberg Antiferromagnet,” Physical Review Letters 123 no. 20, (Nov., 2019) 207203, arXiv:1905.09837 [cond-mat.str-el].
  40. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, “Conformal bootstrap bounds for the U⁢(1)𝑈1U(1)italic_U ( 1 ) Dirac spin liquid and N=7𝑁7N=7italic_N = 7 Stiefel liquid,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 2, (2022) 014, arXiv:2107.14637 [cond-mat.str-el].
  41. S. Albayrak, R. S. Erramilli, Z. Li, D. Poland, and Y. Xin, “Bootstrapping Nfsubscript𝑁𝑓N_{f}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=4 conformal QED33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 8, (2022) 085008, arXiv:2112.02106 [hep-th].
  42. X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, “From Spinon Band Topology to the Symmetry Quantum Numbers of Monopoles in Dirac Spin Liquids,” Phys. Rev. X 10 (Feb, 2020) 011033.
  43. X.-Y. Song, C. Wang, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, “Unifying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets,” Nature Communications 10 (Sept., 2019) 4254, arXiv:1811.11186 [cond-mat.str-el].
  44. N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, “No evidence for bilinear condensate in parity-invariant three-dimensional QED with massless fermions,” Phys.Rev.D 93 no. 4, (2016) 045020, arXiv:1512.02993 [hep-lat].
  45. N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, “Scale invariance of parity-invariant three-dimensional QED,” Phys.Rev.D 94 no. 6, (2016) 065026, arXiv:1606.04109 [hep-th].
  46. N. Karthik and R. Narayanan, “Numerical determination of monopole scaling dimension in parity-invariant three-dimensional noncompact QED,” Phys.Rev.D 100 no. 5, (2019) 054514, arXiv:1908.05500 [hep-lat].
  47. Z. Li, “Solving QED33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT with Conformal Bootstrap,” arXiv:1812.09281 [hep-th].
  48. M. Reehorst, M. Refinetti, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping traceless symmetric O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) scalars,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 4, (2023) 068, arXiv:2012.08533 [hep-th].
  49. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, “A roadmap for bootstrapping critical gauge theories: decoupling operators of conformal field theories in d>2𝑑2d>2italic_d > 2 dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 111, arXiv:2101.07262 [hep-th].
  50. A. Nahum, “Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 102 no. 20, (2020) 201116, arXiv:1912.13468 [cond-mat.str-el].
  51. R. Ma and C. Wang, “Theory of deconfined pseudocriticality,” Phys. Rev. B 102 no. 2, (2020) 020407, arXiv:1912.12315 [cond-mat.str-el].
  52. V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, weak first-order transitions, and complex CFTs,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 no. 10, (Oct, 2018) 108, arXiv:1807.11512 [hep-th].
  53. V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model at Q>4𝑄4Q>4italic_Q > 4,” SciPost Physics 5 no. 5, (Nov, 2018) 050, arXiv:1808.04380 [hep-th].
  54. T. Ohtsuki, Applied Conformal Bootstrap. PhD thesis, University of Tokyo, 2016.
  55. Z. Li and D. Poland, “Searching for gauge theories with the conformal bootstrap,” JHEP 03 (2021) 172, arXiv:2005.01721 [hep-th].
  56. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, and N. Su, “Non-Wilson-Fisher kinks of O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) numerical bootstrap: from the deconfined phase transition to a putative new family of CFTs,” SciPost Phys. 10 no. 5, (2021) 115, arXiv:2005.04250 [hep-th].
  57. D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, “Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 no. 5, (May, 2008) 012, arXiv:0803.1467 [hep-th].
  58. A. Dymarsky, J. Penedones, E. Trevisani, and A. Vichi, “Charting the space of 3D CFTs with a continuous global symmetry,” JHEP 05 (2019) 098, arXiv:1705.04278 [hep-th].
  59. M. Reehorst, E. Trevisani, and A. Vichi, “Mixed Scalar-Current bootstrap in three dimensions,” arXiv:1911.05747 [hep-th].
  60. F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping the O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) vector models,” JHEP 06 (2014) 091, arXiv:1307.6856 [hep-th].
  61. Y.-C. He, J. Rong, N. Su, and A. Vichi, “Non-Abelian currents bootstrap,” arXiv:2302.11585 [hep-th].
  62. J. Rong and S. Rychkov, “Classifying irreducible fixed points of five scalar fields in perturbation theory,” arXiv:2306.09419 [hep-th].
  63. J. Rong and N. Su, “Scalar CFTs and Their Large N Limits,” JHEP 09 (2018) 103, arXiv:1712.00985 [hep-th].
  64. A. Stergiou, “Bootstrapping hypercubic and hypertetrahedral theories in three dimensions,” JHEP 05 (2018) 035, arXiv:1801.07127 [hep-th].
  65. A. Aharony, “Critical Behavior of Anisotropic Cubic Systems,” Phys. Rev. B 8 (1973) 4270–4273.
  66. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, “Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories,” SciPost Phys. 6 no. 3, (2019) 035, arXiv:1810.10015 [hep-th].
  67. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, “Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories II,” SciPost Phys. 8 no. 6, (2020) 085, arXiv:1911.00522 [hep-th].
  68. Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, “Approaching the conformal window of O⁢(n)×O⁢(m)𝑂𝑛𝑂𝑚O(n)\times O(m)italic_O ( italic_n ) × italic_O ( italic_m ) symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models using the conformal bootstrap,” Phys.Rev. D89 no. 12, (2014) 126009, arXiv:1404.0489 [hep-th].
  69. J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and A. Stergiou, “Analytic and Numerical Bootstrap of CFTs with O⁢(m)×O⁢(n)𝑂𝑚𝑂𝑛O(m)\times O(n)italic_O ( italic_m ) × italic_O ( italic_n ) Global Symmetry in 3D,” SciPost Phys. 9 no. 3, (2020) 035, arXiv:2004.14388 [hep-th].
  70. A. Stergiou, “Bootstrapping MN and Tetragonal CFTs in Three Dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 010, arXiv:1904.00017 [hep-th].
  71. J. Henriksson and A. Stergiou, “Perturbative and Nonperturbative Studies of CFTs with MN Global Symmetry,” SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 015, arXiv:2101.08788 [hep-th].
  72. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, “Bootstrapping mixed MN correlators in 3D,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 6, (2022) 206, arXiv:2112.03919 [hep-th].
  73. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, “CFTs with U⁢(m)×U⁢(n)𝑈𝑚𝑈𝑛U(m)\times U(n)italic_U ( italic_m ) × italic_U ( italic_n ) global symmetry in 3D and the chiral phase transition of QCD,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 2, (2023) 075, arXiv:2209.02837 [hep-th].
  74. M. Reehorst and B. Sirois, “Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: O⁢(N)×O⁢(2)O𝑁O2{\rm O}(N)\times{\rm O}(2)roman_O ( italic_N ) × roman_O ( 2 ) model,”. Talk at Bootstrap 2023, Saõ Paulo, Brazil, June 30, 2023.
  75. M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, B. Sirois, and B. C. van Rees, “Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiral O⁢(N)×O⁢(2)O𝑁O2{\rm O}(N)\times{\rm O}(2)roman_O ( italic_N ) × roman_O ( 2 ) universality class,”. to appear.
  76. C. Behan, “Bootstrapping the long-range Ising model in three dimensions,” J. Phys. A52 no. 7, (2019) 075401, arXiv:1810.07199 [hep-th].
  77. C. Behan, E. Lauria, M. Nocchi, and P. van Vliet, “Analytic and numerical bootstrap for the long-range Ising model,” arXiv:2311.02742 [hep-th].
  78. F. Gliozzi, “More constraining conformal bootstrap,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013) 161602, arXiv:1307.3111.
  79. J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M. A. Metlitski, I. A. Gruzberg, and M. Meineri, “The extraordinary boundary transition in the 3d O(N) model via conformal bootstrap,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 6, (2022) 190, arXiv:2111.03071 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  80. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago,” JHEP 11 (2015) 106, arXiv:1504.07997 [hep-th].
  81. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Precision Islands in the Ising and O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) Models,” JHEP 08 (2016) 036, arXiv:1603.04436 [hep-th].
  82. S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, “Carving out OPE space and precise O⁢(2)𝑂2O(2)italic_O ( 2 ) model critical exponents,” JHEP 06 (2020) 142, arXiv:1912.03324 [hep-th].
  83. S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping Heisenberg magnets and their cubic instability,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 10, (2021) 105013, arXiv:2011.14647 [hep-th].
  84. Wikipedia, “Delaunay triangulation.”.
  85. S. M. Chester and N. Su, “Upper critical dimension of the 3-state Potts model,” arXiv:2210.09091 [hep-th].
  86. J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, T. C. P. Chui, and U. E. Israelsson, “Heat Capacity and Thermal Relaxation of Bulk Helium very near the Lambda Point,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 944–947.
  87. J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, Z. K. Geng, P. R. Williamson, D. A. Stricker, T. C. P. Chui, U. E. Israelsson, and M. Larson, “Specific Heat of Helium Confined to a 57- mum Planar Geometry near the Lambda Point,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4894–4897.
  88. J. Lipa, J. Nissen, D. Stricker, D. Swanson, and T. Chui, “Specific heat of liquid helium in zero gravity very near the lambda point,” Phys.Rev. B68 (2003) 174518.
  89. M. Hasenbusch, “Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 100 no. 22, (2019) 224517, arXiv:1910.05916 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  90. J. A. Gracey, “Fermion bilinear operator critical exponents at O⁢(1/N2)𝑂1superscript𝑁2O(1/N^{2})italic_O ( 1 / italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) in the QED-Gross-Neveu universality class,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 8, (2018) 085012, arXiv:1808.07697 [hep-th].
  91. A. N. Manashov and M. Strohmaier, “Correction exponents in the Gross–Neveu–Yukawa model at 1/N21superscript𝑁21/N^{2}1 / italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 6, (2018) 454, arXiv:1711.02493 [hep-th].
  92. R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Gross-Neveu-Yukawa archipelago,” JHEP 02 (2023) 036, arXiv:2210.02492 [hep-th].
  93. B. Ihrig, L. N. Mihaila, and M. M. Scherer, “Critical behavior of Dirac fermions from perturbative renormalization,” Phys. Rev. B 98 no. 12, (2018) 125109, arXiv:1806.04977 [cond-mat.str-el].
  94. E. Huffman and S. Chandrasekharan, “Fermion-bag inspired Hamiltonian lattice field theory for fermionic quantum criticality,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 7, (2020) 074501, arXiv:1912.12823 [cond-mat.str-el].
  95. Y. Liu, W. Wang, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, “Designer Monte Carlo simulation for the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa transition,” Phys. Rev. B 101 no. 6, (2020) 064308, arXiv:1910.07430 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  96. A. Aharony, “Critical behavior of anisotropic cubic systems,” Phys. Rev. B 8 (1973) 4270–4273.
  97. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, “Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory,” Phys. Rept. 368 (2002) 549–727, arXiv:cond-mat/0012164.
  98. M. Hasenbusch and E. Vicari, “Anisotropic perturbations in three-dimensional O(N)-symmetric vector models,” Phys. Rev. B 84 no. 12, (2011) 125136, arXiv:1108.0491 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  99. M. Hasenbusch, “Cubic fixed point in three dimensions: Monte Carlo simulations of the ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ4 model on the simple cubic lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 107 no. 2, (2023) 024409, arXiv:2211.16170 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  100. J. Rong and N. Su, “From O(3) to Cubic CFT: Conformal Perturbation and the Large Charge Sector,” arXiv:2311.00933 [hep-th].
  101. A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, and A. Kudlis, “Different critical behaviors in cubic to trigonal and tetragonal perovskites,” Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 104101, arXiv:2201.08252 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  102. N. Su, “The Indicator , Letter to Slava Rychkov (March 7, 2020),”.
  103. M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, B. Sirois, N. Su, and B. van Rees, “Navigator Function for the Conformal Bootstrap,” SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 072, arXiv:2104.09518 [hep-th].
  104. Wikipedia, “Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algorithm.”.
  105. N. Su, “Semidefinite program and the navigator function,”. Mini-Course of Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, Lecture 4, April 27, 2023.
  106. M. Reehorst, “Rigorous bounds on irrelevant operators in the 3d Ising model CFT,” JHEP 09 (2022) 177, arXiv:2111.12093 [hep-th].
  107. B. Sirois, “Navigating through the O(N) archipelago,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 4, (2022) 081, arXiv:2203.11597 [hep-th].
  108. J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and M. Reehorst, “Spectrum continuity and level repulsion: the Ising CFT from infinitesimal to finite ε𝜀\varepsilonitalic_ε,” JHEP 02 (2023) 218, arXiv:2207.10118 [hep-th].
  109. D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT,” JHEP 03 (2017) 086, arXiv:1612.08471 [hep-th].
  110. S. El-Showk and M. F. Paulos, “Bootstrapping Conformal Field Theories with the Extremal Functional Method,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 no. 24, (2013) 241601, arXiv:1211.2810 [hep-th].
  111. J. Liu, D. Meltzer, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Lorentzian inversion formula and the spectrum of the 3d O(2) CFT,” JHEP 09 (2020) 115, arXiv:2007.07914 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 206 (2021)].
  112. S. El-Showk, M. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Conformal Field Theories in Fractional Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 141601, arXiv:1309.5089 [hep-th].
  113. A. Cappelli, L. Maffi, and S. Okuda, “Critical Ising Model in Varying Dimension by Conformal Bootstrap,” JHEP 01 (2019) 161, arXiv:1811.07751 [hep-th].
  114. C. Bonanno, A. Cappelli, M. Kompaniets, S. Okuda, and K. J. Wiese, “Benchmarking the Ising Universality Class in 3⩽d<43𝑑43\leqslant d<43 ⩽ italic_d < 4 dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 135, arXiv:2210.03051 [hep-th].
  115. J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, “Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry,” J.Phys. A46 (2013) 214011, arXiv:1112.1016 [hep-th].
  116. M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, “Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 025005, arXiv:1409.1581 [hep-th].
  117. M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, “Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in 4-ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 12, (2016) 125025, arXiv:1512.00013 [hep-th].
  118. J. Golden and M. F. Paulos, “No unitary bootstrap for the fractal Ising model,” JHEP 03 (2015) 167, arXiv:1411.7932 [hep-th].
  119. G. P. Korchemsky, “On level crossing in conformal field theories,” JHEP 03 (2016) 212, arXiv:1512.05362 [hep-th].
  120. C. Behan, “Conformal manifolds: ODEs from OPEs,” JHEP 03 (2018) 127, arXiv:1709.03967 [hep-th].
  121. W. Janke and R. Villanova, “Three-dimensional three state Potts model revisited with new techniques,” Nucl. Phys. B 489 (1997) 679–696, arXiv:hep-lat/9612008.
  122. S. Rychkov, “Open Problems in Conformal Bootstrap. Problem 1: Bootstrap proof of first-order transitions?,”. 2020.
  123. J. Lee and J. M. Kosterlitz, “Three-dimensional q-state Potts model: Monte Carlo study near q=3𝑞3q=3italic_q = 3,” Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 1268–1271.
  124. V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,” JHEP 10 (2018) 108, arXiv:1807.11512 [hep-th].
  125. N. Su, “Skydiving to Bootstrap Islands: an Algorithm for Dynamically Constrained SDP,”. Talk at the 2022 Collaboration on the Nonperturbative Bootstrap Annual Meeting (November 10-11, 2022).
  126. A. Liu, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and B. C. van Rees, “Skydiving to Bootstrap Islands,” arXiv:2307.13046 [hep-th].
  127. N. Su, “The Hybrid Bootstrap,” arXiv:2202.07607 [hep-th].
  128. S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe, “On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,” JHEP 12 (2015) 071, arXiv:1505.01537 [hep-th].
  129. A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, and F. K. Seibold, “Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data,” JHEP 06 (2017) 011, arXiv:1611.02912 [hep-th].
  130. S. M. Chester and N. Su, “Bootstrapping Deconfined Quantum Tricriticality,” arXiv:2310.08343 [hep-th].
  131. C. Behan, L. Di Pietro, E. Lauria, and B. C. Van Rees, “Bootstrapping boundary-localized interactions,” JHEP 12 (2020) 182, arXiv:2009.03336 [hep-th].
  132. C. Behan, L. Di Pietro, E. Lauria, and B. C. van Rees, “Bootstrapping boundary-localized interactions II. Minimal models at the boundary,” JHEP 03 (2022) 146, arXiv:2111.04747 [hep-th].
  133. J. Rong and J. Zhu, “On the ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT theory above six dimensions,” JHEP 04 (2020) 151, arXiv:2001.10864 [hep-th].
  134. Y. Nakayama, “Is there supersymmetric Lee–Yang fixed point in three dimensions?,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 no. 24, (2021) 2150176, arXiv:2104.13570 [hep-th].
  135. D. Poland, V. Prilepina, and P. Tadić, “The five-point bootstrap,” JHEP 10 (2023) 153, arXiv:2305.08914 [hep-th].
  136. A. Bissi, A. Manenti, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping mixed correlators in 𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N = 4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 05 (2021) 111, arXiv:2010.15126 [hep-th].
  137. A. Gimenez-Grau and P. Liendo, “Bootstrapping line defects in 𝒩=2𝒩2\mathcal{N}=2caligraphic_N = 2 theories,” JHEP 03 (2020) 121, arXiv:1907.04345 [hep-th].
  138. D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, M. Jerdee, and S. S. Pufu, “The 3d 𝒩𝒩\mathcal{N}caligraphic_N = 6 bootstrap: from higher spins to strings to membranes,” JHEP 05 (2021) 083, arXiv:2011.05728 [hep-th].
  139. N. B. Agmon, S. M. Chester, and S. S. Pufu, “The M-theory Archipelago,” JHEP 02 (2020) 010, arXiv:1907.13222 [hep-th].
  140. Y.-H. Lin, D. Meltzer, S.-H. Shao, and A. Stergiou, “Bounds on Triangle Anomalies in (3+1)d𝑑ditalic_d,” arXiv:1909.11676 [hep-th].
  141. A. Gimenez-Grau and P. Liendo, “Bootstrapping Coulomb and Higgs branch operators,” JHEP 01 (2021) 175, arXiv:2006.01847 [hep-th].
  142. A. Bissi, F. Fucito, A. Manenti, J. F. Morales, and R. Savelli, “OPE coefficients in Argyres-Douglas theories,” JHEP 06 (2022) 085, arXiv:2112.11899 [hep-th].
  143. P. Liendo, C. Meneghelli, and V. Mitev, “Bootstrapping the half-BPS line defect,” JHEP 10 (2018) 077, arXiv:1806.01862 [hep-th].
  144. A. Cavaglià, N. Gromov, J. Julius, and M. Preti, “Integrability and conformal bootstrap: One dimensional defect conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 2, (2022) L021902, arXiv:2107.08510 [hep-th].
  145. A. Cavaglià, N. Gromov, J. Julius, and M. Preti, “Bootstrability in defect CFT: integrated correlators and sharper bounds,” JHEP 05 (2022) 164, arXiv:2203.09556 [hep-th].
  146. V. Niarchos, C. Papageorgakis, P. Richmond, A. G. Stapleton, and M. Woolley, “Bootstrability in Line-Defect CFT with Improved Truncation Methods,” arXiv:2306.15730 [hep-th].
  147. M. Picco, S. Ribault, and R. Santachiara, “On four-point connectivities in the critical 2d Potts model,” SciPost Phys. 7 no. 4, (2019) 044, arXiv:1906.02566 [hep-th].
  148. R. Nivesvivat and S. Ribault, “Logarithmic CFT at generic central charge: from Liouville theory to the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-state Potts model,” SciPost Phys. 10 no. 1, (2021) 021, arXiv:2007.04190 [hep-th].
  149. L. Grans-Samuelsson, R. Nivesvivat, J. L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault, and H. Saleur, “Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensional O⁢(n)𝑂𝑛O(n)italic_O ( italic_n ) model,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 5, (2022) 147, arXiv:2111.01106 [hep-th].
  150. S. Ribault, “Diagonal fields in critical loop models,” SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 020, arXiv:2209.09706 [hep-th].
  151. M. F. Paulos and Z. Zheng, “Bounding 3d CFT correlators,” JHEP 04 (2022) 102, arXiv:2107.01215 [hep-th].
  152. N. Afkhami-Jeddi, “Conformal bootstrap deformations,” JHEP 09 (2022) 225, arXiv:2111.01799 [hep-th].
  153. W. Landry. https://github.com/davidsd/sdpb/tree/outer.
  154. K. Ghosh and Z. Zheng, “Numerical Conformal bootstrap with Analytic Functionals and Outer Approximation,” arXiv:2307.11144 [hep-th].
  155. G. Kántor, V. Niarchos, and C. Papageorgakis, “Conformal bootstrap with reinforcement learning,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 2, (2022) 025018, arXiv:2108.09330 [hep-th].
  156. U. A. Luviano Valenzuela, Stochastic Minimization in the Conformal Bootstrap. PhD thesis, SISSA, Trieste, 2022.
  157. A. Laio, U. L. Valenzuela, and M. Serone, “Monte Carlo approach to the conformal bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 2, (2022) 025019, arXiv:2206.05193 [hep-th].
  158. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, “Anomalies and Bounds on Charged Operators,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 2, (2019) 025013, arXiv:1904.04833 [hep-th].
  159. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, “ℤNsubscriptℤ𝑁\mathbb{Z}_{N}roman_ℤ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetries, anomalies, and the modular bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 12, (2021) 125001, arXiv:2101.08343 [hep-th].
  160. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, “Bootstrapping noninvertible symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 125025, arXiv:2302.13900 [hep-th].
  161. A. Grigoletto and P. Putrov, “Spin-Cobordisms, Surgeries and Fermionic Modular Bootstrap,” Commun. Math. Phys. 401 no. 3, (2023) 3169–3245, arXiv:2106.16247 [hep-th].
  162. A. Grigoletto, “Anomalies of fermionic CFTs via cobordism and bootstrap,” arXiv:2112.01485 [hep-th].
  163. L.-Y. Chiang, T.-C. Huang, Y.-t. Huang, W. Li, L. Rodina, and H.-C. Weng, “The Geometry of the Modular Bootstrap,” arXiv:2308.11692 [hep-th].
  164. A. L. Fitzpatrick and W. Li, “Improving Modular Bootstrap Bounds with Integrality,” arXiv:2308.08725 [hep-th].
  165. Y.-T. Huang, W. Li, and G.-L. Lin, “The geometry of optimal functionals,” arXiv:1912.01273 [hep-th].
  166. J.-B. Bae, S. Lee, and J. Song, “Modular Constraints on Superconformal Field Theories,” JHEP 01 (2019) 209, arXiv:1811.00976 [hep-th].
  167. J.-B. Bae, “Constraining Two dimensional CFTs with Modular Invariance,” PoS ICHEP2018 (2019) 318.
  168. T. Hartman, D. Mazáč, and L. Rastelli, “Sphere Packing and Quantum Gravity,” JHEP 12 (2019) 048, arXiv:1905.01319 [hep-th].
  169. N. Benjamin and Y.-H. Lin, “Lessons from the Ramond sector,” SciPost Phys. 9 no. 5, (2020) 065, arXiv:2005.02394 [hep-th].
  170. N. Benjamin and C.-H. Chang, “Scalar modular bootstrap and zeros of the Riemann zeta function,” JHEP 11 (2022) 143, arXiv:2208.02259 [hep-th].
  171. S. Collier, D. Mazac, and Y. Wang, “Bootstrapping boundaries and branes,” JHEP 02 (2023) 019, arXiv:2112.00750 [hep-th].
  172. N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman, D. de Laat, and A. Tajdini, “High-dimensional sphere packing and the modular bootstrap,” JHEP 12 (2020) 066, arXiv:2006.02560 [hep-th].
  173. R. A. Lanzetta and L. Fidkowski, “Bootstrapping Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies,” Phys. Rev. B 107 no. 20, (2023) 205137, arXiv:2207.05092 [cond-mat.str-el].
  174. J. Bonifacio and K. Hinterbichler, “Bootstrap Bounds on Closed Einstein Manifolds,” JHEP 10 (2020) 069, arXiv:2007.10337 [hep-th].
  175. J. Bonifacio, “Bootstrap bounds on closed hyperbolic manifolds,” JHEP 02 (2022) 025, arXiv:2107.09674 [hep-th].
  176. P. Kravchuk, D. Mazac, and S. Pal, “Automorphic Spectra and the Conformal Bootstrap,” arXiv:2111.12716 [hep-th].
  177. J. Bonifacio, “Bootstrapping closed hyperbolic surfaces,” JHEP 03 (2022) 093, arXiv:2111.13215 [hep-th].
  178. J. Bonifacio, D. Mazac, and S. Pal, “Spectral Bounds on Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds: Associativity and the Trace Formula,” arXiv:2308.11174 [math.SP].
  179. E. Gesteau, S. Pal, D. Simmons-Duffin, and Y. Xu, “Bounds on spectral gaps of Hyperbolic spin surfaces,” arXiv:2311.13330 [math.SP].
  180. M. Kruczenski, J. Penedones, and B. C. van Rees, “Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap,” arXiv:2203.02421 [hep-th].
  181. P. D. Anderson and M. Kruczenski, “Loop Equations and bootstrap methods in the lattice,” Nucl. Phys. B 921 (2017) 702–726, arXiv:1612.08140 [hep-th].
  182. V. Kazakov and Z. Zheng, “Bootstrap for lattice Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 5, (2023) L051501, arXiv:2203.11360 [hep-th].
  183. M. Cho, B. Gabai, Y.-H. Lin, V. A. Rodriguez, J. Sandor, and X. Yin, “Bootstrapping the Ising Model on the Lattice,” arXiv:2206.12538 [hep-th].
  184. H. W. Lin, “Bootstraps to strings: solving random matrix models with positivity,” JHEP 06 (2020) 090, arXiv:2002.08387 [hep-th].
  185. V. Kazakov and Z. Zheng, “Analytic and numerical bootstrap for one-matrix model and “unsolvable” two-matrix model,” JHEP 06 (2022) 030, arXiv:2108.04830 [hep-th].
  186. X. Han, S. A. Hartnoll, and J. Kruthoff, “Bootstrapping Matrix Quantum Mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 4, (2020) 041601, arXiv:2004.10212 [hep-th].
  187. H. W. Lin, “Bootstrap bounds on D0-brane quantum mechanics,” JHEP 06 (2023) 038, arXiv:2302.04416 [hep-th].
  188. N. Afkhami-Jeddi, T. Hartman, and A. Tajdini, “Fast Conformal Bootstrap and Constraints on 3d Gravity,” JHEP 05 (2019) 087, arXiv:1903.06272 [hep-th].
  189. M. F. Paulos and B. Zan, “A functional approach to the numerical conformal bootstrap,” JHEP 09 (2020) 006, arXiv:1904.03193 [hep-th].
  190. K. Ghosh, A. Kaviraj, and M. F. Paulos, “Charging up the functional bootstrap,” JHEP 10 (2021) 116, arXiv:2107.00041 [hep-th].
  191. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025022, arXiv:1203.6064 [hep-th].
Citations (15)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free