Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimize the event selection strategy to study the anomalous quartic gauge couplings at muon colliders using the support vector machine and quantum support vector machine

Published 26 Nov 2023 in hep-ph | (2311.15280v3)

Abstract: The search of the new physics~(NP) beyond the Standard Model is one of the most important topics in current high energy physics. With the increasing luminosities at the colliders, the search for NP signals requires the analysis of more and more data, and the efficiency in data processing becomes particularly important. As a machine learning algorithm, support vector machine~(SVM) is expected to to be useful in the search of NP. Meanwhile, the quantum computing has the potential to offer huge advantages when dealing with large amounts of data, which suggests that quantum SVM~(QSVM) is a potential tool in future phenomenological studies of the NP. How to use SVM and QSVM to optimize event selection strategies to search for NP signals are studied in this paper. Taking the tri-photon process at a muon collider as an example, it can be shown that the event selection strategies optimized by the SVM and QSVM are effective in the search of the dimension-8 operators contributing to the anomalous quartic gauge couplings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (68)
  1. J. Ellis, Outstanding questions: Physics beyond the Standard Model, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 370, 818 (2012).
  2. S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  3. S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64, 83 (2014), arXiv:1401.0470 [hep-ph] .
  4. E. Massó, An effective guide to beyond the standard model physics, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 10.1007/jhep10(2014)128 (2014).
  5. M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144, 425 (1934).
  6. J. Ellis and S.-F. Ge, Constraining Gluonic Quartic Gauge Coupling Operators with gg→γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 041801 (2018), arXiv:1802.02416 [hep-ph] .
  7. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You, Light-by-Light Scattering Constraint on Born-Infeld Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 261802 (2017), arXiv:1703.08450 [hep-ph] .
  8. J. Ellis, H.-J. He, and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing new physics in dimension-8 neutral gauge couplings at e+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTe−{}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT colliders, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64, 221062 (2021), arXiv:2008.04298 [hep-ph] .
  9. G. J. Gounaris, J. Layssac, and F. M. Renard, Off-shell structure of the anomalous Z𝑍Zitalic_Z and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ selfcouplings, Phys. Rev. D 62, 073012 (2000a), arXiv:hep-ph/0005269 .
  10. G. J. Gounaris, J. Layssac, and F. M. Renard, Signatures of the anomalous Zγsubscript𝑍𝛾Z_{\gamma}italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Z⁢Z𝑍𝑍ZZitalic_Z italic_Z production at the lepton and hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 61, 073013 (2000b), arXiv:hep-ph/9910395 .
  11. C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 10.1007/jhep02(2014)101 (2014).
  12. S. Jahedi and J. Lahiri, Probing anomalous ZZγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ and Zγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ couplings at the e+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTe−{}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT colliders using optimal observable technique, JHEP 04, 085, arXiv:2212.05121 [hep-ph] .
  13. S. Jahedi, Optimal estimation of dimension-8 neutral triple gauge couplings at the e+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTe−{}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT colliders, JHEP 12, 031, arXiv:2305.11266 [hep-ph] .
  14. C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095003 (2019a), arXiv:1808.00010 [hep-ph] .
  15. Q. Bi, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space, JHEP 06, 137, arXiv:1902.08977 [hep-ph] .
  16. C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective to the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201601 (2020), arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph] .
  17. C. F. Anders et al., Vector boson scattering: Recent experimental and theory developments, Rev. Phys. 3, 44 (2018a), arXiv:1801.04203 [hep-ph] .
  18. P. Baldi, P. Sadowski, and D. Whiteson, Searching for Exotic Particles in High-Energy Physics with Deep Learning, Nature Commun. 5, 4308 (2014), arXiv:1402.4735 [hep-ph] .
  19. J. Ren, L. Wu, and J. M. Yang, Unveiling CP property of top-Higgs coupling with graph neural networks at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135198 (2020), arXiv:1901.05627 [hep-ph] .
  20. R. T. D’Agnolo and A. Wulzer, Learning New Physics from a Machine, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015014 (2019), arXiv:1806.02350 [hep-ph] .
  21. J.-C. Yang, J.-H. Chen, and Y.-C. Guo, Extract the energy scale of anomalous γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ → W+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTW−{}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT scattering in the vector boson scattering process using artificial neural networks, JHEP 2021 (9), 085, arXiv:2107.13624 [hep-ph] .
  22. L. Jiang, Y.-C. Guo, and J.-C. Yang, Detecting anomalous quartic gauge couplings using the isolation forest machine learning algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035021 (2021), arXiv:2103.03151 [hep-ph] .
  23. A. De Simone and T. Jacques, Guiding New Physics Searches with Unsupervised Learning, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 289 (2019), arXiv:1807.06038 [hep-ph] .
  24. G. Kasieczka et al., The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 124201 (2021), arXiv:2101.08320 [hep-ph] .
  25. Y.-C. Guo, L. Jiang, and J.-C. Yang, Detecting anomalous quartic gauge couplings using the isolation forest machine learning algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035021 (2021), arXiv:2103.03151 [hep-ph] .
  26. J.-C. Yang, Y.-C. Guo, and L.-H. Cai, Using a nested anomaly detection machine learning algorithm to study the neutral triple gauge couplings at an e+e−-- collider, Nucl. Phys. B 977, 115735 (2022b), arXiv:2111.10543 [hep-ph] .
  27. Y.-F. Dong, Y.-C. Mao, and J.-C. Yang, Searching for anomalous quartic gauge couplings at muon colliders using principal component analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 555 (2023), arXiv:2304.01505 [hep-ph] .
  28. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory (1992).
  29. P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, Quantum support vector machine for big data classification, Physical Review Letters 113, 10.1103/physrevlett.113.130503 (2014).
  30. M. Schuld and N. Killoran, Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040504 (2019).
  31. Z. Özpolat and M. Karabatak, Exploring the Potential of Quantum-Based Machine Learning: A Comparative Study of QSVM and Classical Machine Learning Algorithms (2023).
  32. G. Aksoy and M. Karabatak, Comparison of QSVM with Other Machine Learning Algorithms on EEG Signals (2023).
  33. S. L. Wu et al., Application of quantum machine learning using the quantum variational classifier method to high energy physics analysis at the LHC on IBM quantum computer simulator and hardware with 10 qubits, J. Phys. G 48, 125003 (2021a), arXiv:2012.11560 [quant-ph] .
  34. S. L. Wu et al., Application of quantum machine learning using the quantum kernel algorithm on high energy physics analysis at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033221 (2021b), arXiv:2104.05059 [quant-ph] .
  35. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Evidence for Electroweak Production of W±⁢W±⁢j⁢jsuperscript𝑊plus-or-minussuperscript𝑊plus-or-minus𝑗𝑗W^{\pm}W^{\pm}jjitalic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j italic_j in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p Collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 141803 (2014), arXiv:1405.6241 [hep-ex] .
  36. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135710 (2020a), arXiv:2005.01173 [hep-ex] .
  37. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Studies of Z⁢γ𝑍𝛾Z\gammaitalic_Z italic_γ production in association with a high-mass dijet system in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 2017 (7), 107, arXiv:1705.01966 [hep-ex] .
  38. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of Zγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ in association with two jets and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in proton–proton collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 770, 380 (2017a), arXiv:1702.03025 [hep-ex] .
  39. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a Z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings, JHEP 2020 (6), 76, arXiv:2002.09902 [hep-ex] .
  40. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Measurement of electroweak-induced production of Wγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ with two jets in pp collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, JHEP 2017 (6), 106, arXiv:1612.09256 [hep-ex] .
  41. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Measurement of vector boson scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings from events with four leptons and two jets in proton–proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 774, 682 (2017), arXiv:1708.02812 [hep-ex] .
  42. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Measurement of differential cross sections for Z boson pair production in association with jets at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 and 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 789, 19 (2019a), arXiv:1806.11073 [hep-ex] .
  43. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Observation of electroweak W±⁢Zsuperscript𝑊plus-or-minus𝑍W^{\pm}Zitalic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Z boson pair production in association with two jets in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 793, 469 (2019), arXiv:1812.09740 [hep-ex] .
  44. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Measurement of electroweak WZ boson production and search for new physics in WZ + two jets events in pp collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 795, 281 (2019b), arXiv:1901.04060 [hep-ex] .
  45. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Evidence for exclusive γ⁢γ→W+⁢W−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝑊superscript𝑊\gamma\gamma\to W^{+}W^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 2016 (8), 119, arXiv:1604.04464 [hep-ex] .
  46. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 081801 (2018), arXiv:1709.05822 [hep-ex] .
  47. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134985 (2019c), arXiv:1905.07445 [hep-ex] .
  48. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Observation of electroweak production of Wγ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ with two jets in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135988 (2020c), arXiv:2008.10521 [hep-ex] .
  49. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 812, 135992 (2021), arXiv:2008.07013 [hep-ex] .
  50. D. R. Green, P. Meade, and M.-A. Pleier, Multiboson interactions at the LHC, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035008 (2017), arXiv:1610.07572 [hep-ex] .
  51. C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095003 (2019b), arXiv:1808.00010 [hep-ph] .
  52. Y.-C. Guo, Y.-Y. Wang, and J.-C. Yang, Constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings by γ⁢γ→W+⁢W−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝑊superscript𝑊\gamma\gamma\to W^{+}W^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 961, 115222 (2020b), arXiv:1912.10686 [hep-ph] .
  53. H. Al Ali et al., The muon Smasher’s guide, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85, 084201 (2022), arXiv:2103.14043 [hep-ph] .
  54. R. Franceschini and M. Greco, Higgs and BSM Physics at the Future Muon Collider, Symmetry 13, 851 (2021), arXiv:2104.05770 [hep-ph] .
  55. W. Liu and K.-P. Xie, Probing electroweak phase transition with multi-TeV muon colliders and gravitational waves, JHEP 2021 (4), 015, arXiv:2101.10469 [hep-ph] .
  56. W. Liu, K.-P. Xie, and Z. Yi, Testing leptogenesis at the LHC and future muon colliders: A Z’ scenario, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095034 (2022a), arXiv:2109.15087 [hep-ph] .
  57. C. Anders et al., Vector boson scattering: Recent experimental and theory developments, Rev. Phys. 3, 44 (2018b), arXiv:1801.04203 [hep-ph] .
  58. O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. K. Mizukoshi, p p —>>> j j e+- mu+- nu nu and j j e+- mu-+ nu nu at O( alpha(em)**6) and O(alpha(em)**4 alpha(s)**2) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 74, 073005 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606118 .
  59. O. J. P. Éboli and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D 93, 093013 (2016), arXiv:1604.03555 [hep-ph] .
  60. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Machine Learning 20, 273 (1995).
  61. J. H. Friedman, Recent advances in (machine) learning, eConf C030908, WEAT003 (2003).
  62. M. Alhroob, Search for new physics in single top channel at the lhc (2012), arXiv:1212.4236 [hep-ex] .
  63. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614 (2009), arXiv:0806.4194 [hep-ph] .
  64. D. Donoho and J. Jin, Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures, The Annals of Statistics 32, 10.1214/009053604000000265 (2004).
  65. P. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  66. C. Gill, 5 year update to the next steps in quantum computing workshop, Computing Community Consortium  (2023).
  67. A. A. Sherstov, A. A. Storozhenko, and P. Wu, An optimal separation of randomized and Quantum query complexity, SIAM J. Comput. 52, 525 (2023), arXiv:2008.10223 [cs.CC] .
  68. Y. Liu, S. Arunachalam, and K. Temme, A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning, Nature Phys. 17, 1013 (2021), arXiv:2010.02174 [quant-ph] .
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free