Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Revealing Cortical Layers In Histological Brain Images With Self-Supervised Graph Convolutional Networks Applied To Cell-Graphs

Published 26 Nov 2023 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and q-bio.QM | (2311.15262v1)

Abstract: Identifying cerebral cortex layers is crucial for comparative studies of the cytoarchitecture aiming at providing insights into the relations between brain structure and function across species. The absence of extensive annotated datasets typically limits the adoption of machine learning approaches, leading to the manual delineation of cortical layers by neuroanatomists. We introduce a self-supervised approach to detect layers in 2D Nissl-stained histological slices of the cerebral cortex. It starts with the segmentation of individual cells and the creation of an attributed cell-graph. A self-supervised graph convolutional network generates cell embeddings that encode morphological and structural traits of the cellular environment and are exploited by a community detection algorithm for the final layering. Our method, the first self-supervised of its kind with no spatial transcriptomics data involved, holds the potential to accelerate cytoarchitecture analyses, sidestepping annotation needs and advancing cross-species investigation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. K. Amunts, A. Schleicher, and K. Zilles, “Cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex—more than localization,” NeuroImage, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1061–1065, 2007.
  2. J.-M. Graïc, A. Peruffo, L. Corain, L. Finos, E. Grisan, and B. Cozzi, “The primary visual cortex of cetartiodactyls: organization, cytoarchitectonics and comparison with perissodactyls and primates,” Brain Structure and Function, vol. 227, no. 4, pp. 1195–1225, 2022.
  3. J.-M. Graïc, L. Finos, V. Vadori, B. Cozzi, R. Luisetto, T. Gerussi, M. Gatto, A. Doria, E. Grisan, L. Corain et al., “Cytoarchitectureal changes in hippocampal subregions of the nzb/w f1 mouse model of lupus,” Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health, vol. 32, p. 100662, 2023.
  4. A. Štajduhar, T. Lipić, S. Lončarić, M. Judaš, and G. Sedmak, “Interpretable machine learning approach for neuron-centric analysis of human cortical cytoarchitecture,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5567, 2023.
  5. K. Wagstyl, S. Larocque, G. Cucurull, C. Lepage, J. P. Cohen, S. Bludau, N. Palomero-Gallagher, L. B. Lewis, T. Funck, H. Spitzer et al., “Bigbrain 3d atlas of cortical layers: Cortical and laminar thickness gradients diverge in sensory and motor cortices,” PLoS biology, vol. 18, no. 4, p. e3000678, 2020.
  6. J. Hu, X. Li, K. Coleman, A. Schroeder, N. Ma, D. J. Irwin, E. B. Lee, R. T. Shinohara, and M. Li, “Spagcn: Integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network,” Nature methods, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1342–1351, 2021.
  7. Y. Long, K. S. Ang, M. Li, K. L. K. Chong, R. Sethi, C. Zhong, H. Xu, Z. Ong, K. Sachaphibulkij, A. Chen et al., “Spatially informed clustering, integration, and deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics with graphst,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1155, 2023.
  8. J. Li, S. Chen, X. Pan, Y. Yuan, and H.-B. Shen, “Cell clustering for spatial transcriptomics data with graph neural networks,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 399–408, 2022.
  9. H. Ren, B. L. Walker, Z. Cang, and Q. Nie, “Identifying multicellular spatiotemporal organization of cells with spaceflow,” Nature communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4076, 2022.
  10. V. Vadori, A. Peruffo, J.-M. Graïc, L. Finos, L. Corain, and E. Grisan, “Ncis: Deep color gradient maps regression and three-class pixel classification for enhanced neuronal cell instance segmentation in nissl-stained histological images,” in International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.   Springer, 2023, pp. 457–466.
  11. B. Yener, “Cell-graphs: image-driven modeling of structure-function relationship,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2016.
  12. J. M. Phillip, K.-S. Han, W.-C. Chen, D. Wirtz, and P.-H. Wu, “A robust unsupervised machine-learning method to quantify the morphological heterogeneity of cells and nuclei,” Nature protocols, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 754–774, 2021.
  13. S. E. Jones, B. R. Buchbinder, and I. Aharon, “Three-dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using laplace’s equation,” Human brain mapping, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12–32, 2000.
  14. C. L. Adamson, A. G. Wood, J. Chen, S. Barton, D. C. Reutens, C. Pantelis, D. Velakoulis, and M. Walterfang, “Thickness profile generation for the corpus callosum using laplace’s equation,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2131–2140, 2011.
  15. T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907, 2016.
  16. Y. You, T. Chen, Y. Sui, T. Chen, Z. Wang, and Y. Shen, “Graph contrastive learning with augmentations,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 5812–5823, 2020.
  17. J. Mitrovic, B. McWilliams, and M. Rey, “Less can be more in contrastive learning,” in Proceedings on ”I Can’t Believe It’s Not Better!” at NeurIPS Workshops, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 137.   PMLR, 12 Dec 2020, pp. 70–75.
  18. P. Veličković, W. Fedus, W. L. Hamilton, P. Liò, Y. Bengio, and R. D. Hjelm, “Deep graph infomax,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10341, 2018.
  19. K. Sohn, “Improved deep metric learning with multi-class n-pair loss objective,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 29, 2016.
  20. T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2020, pp. 1597–1607.
  21. S. Lloyd, “Least squares quantization in pcm,” IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 1982.
  22. V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, and N. J. Van Eck, “From louvain to leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 5233, 2019.
  23. L. McInnes, J. Healy, and J. Melville, “Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426, 2018.
  24. A. Clauset, M. E. Newman, and C. Moore, “Finding community structure in very large networks,” Physical review E, vol. 70, no. 6, p. 066111, 2004.
  25. L. L. IJsseldijk, A. C. Brownlow, and S. Mazzariol, “Best practice on cetacean post mortem investigation and tissue sampling,” Jt. ACCOBAMS ASCOBANS Doc, pp. 1–73, 2019.
  26. E. Amigó, J. Gonzalo, J. Artiles, and F. Verdejo, “A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints,” Information retrieval, vol. 12, pp. 461–486, 2009.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.