Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum holographic surface anomalies

Published 24 Nov 2023 in hep-th | (2311.14797v1)

Abstract: Expectation values of surface operators suffer from logarithmic divergences reflecting a conformal anomaly. In a holographic setting, where surface operators can be computed by a minimal surface in $AdS$, the leading contribution to the anomaly comes from a divergence in the classical action (or area) of the minimal surface. We study the subleading correction to it due to quantum fluctuations of the minimal surface. In the same way that the divergence in the area does not require a global solution but only a near-boundary analysis, the same holds for the quantum corrections. We study the asymptotic form of the fluctuation determinant and show how to use the heat kernel to calculate the quantum anomaly. In the case of M2-branes describing surface operators in the ${\cal N}=(2,0)$ theory in 6d, our calculation of the one-loop determinant reproduces expressions for the anomaly that have been found by less direct methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (76)
  1. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, “Critical behaviour of semi-infinite systems,” J. Phys. A 10 no. 11, (1977) 1927.
  2. K. Ohno and Y. Okabe, “The 1/N1𝑁1/N1 / italic_N expansion for the extraordinary transition of semi-infinite system,” Prog. Th. Phys. 72 no. 4, (1984) 736–745.
  3. J. L. Cardy, “Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior,” Nuclear Physics B 240 no. 4, (1984) 514–532.
  4. M. A. Metlitski, “Boundary criticality of the O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) model in d=3𝑑3d=3italic_d = 3 critically revisited,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 4, (2022) 131, arXiv:2009.05119.
  5. D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “A scaling limit for line and surface defects,” JHEP 06 (2022) 071, arXiv:2202.03471.
  6. T. Shachar, R. Sinha, and M. Smolkin, “RG flows on two-dimensional spherical defects,” arXiv:2212.08081.
  7. M. Trépanier, “Surface defects in the O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) model,” JHEP 09 (2023) 074, arXiv:2305.10486.
  8. S. Giombi and B. Liu, “Notes on a surface defect in the O⁢(N)𝑂𝑁O(N)italic_O ( italic_N ) model,” arXiv:2305.11402.
  9. A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong, “Phases of surface defects in scalar field theories,” JHEP 08 (2023) 143, arXiv:2305.11370.
  10. S. N. Solodukhin, “Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry,” Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 305–309, arXiv:0802.3117.
  11. L. Bianchi, M. Meineri, R. C. Myers, and M. Smolkin, “Rényi entropy and conformal defects,” JHEP 07 (2016) 076, arXiv:1511.06713.
  12. S. Gukov and E. Witten, “Gauge theory, ramification, and the geometric Langlands program,” hep-th/0612073.
  13. S. Gukov and E. Witten, “Rigid surface operators,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14 no. 1, (2010) 87–178, arXiv:0804.1561.
  14. J. Gomis and B. Le Floch, “M2-brane surface operators and gauge theory dualities in Toda,” JHEP 04 (2016) 183, arXiv:1407.1852.
  15. E. Witten, “Some comments on string dynamics,” in STRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp. 501–523. 7, 1995. hep-th/9507121.
  16. A. Strominger, “Open p𝑝pitalic_p-branes,” Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 44–47, hep-th/9512059.
  17. O. J. Ganor, “Six-dimensional tensionless strings in the large N𝑁Nitalic_N limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 489 (1997) 95–121, hep-th/9605201.
  18. D. Gaiotto, “Surface operators in 𝒩=2𝒩2\mathcal{N}=2caligraphic_N = 2 4d gauge theories,” JHEP 11 (2012) 090, arXiv:0911.1316.
  19. A. Schwimmer and S. Theisen, “Entanglement entropy, trace anomalies and holography,” Nucl. Phys. B 801 (2008) 1–24, arXiv:0802.1017.
  20. J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,” Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95–97.
  21. S. Deser and A. Schwimmer, “Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 279–284, hep-th/9302047.
  22. N. Boulanger, “General solutions of the Wess-Zumino consistency condition for the Weyl anomalies,” JHEP 07 (2007) 069, arXiv:0704.2472.
  23. N. Drukker, M. Probst, and M. Trépanier, “Surface operators in the 6d 𝒩=(2,0)𝒩20\mathcal{N}=(2,0)caligraphic_N = ( 2 , 0 ) theory,” J. Phys. A 53 no. 36, (2020) 365401, arXiv:2003.12372.
  24. C. R. Graham and E. Witten, “Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in A⁢d⁢S𝐴𝑑𝑆AdSitalic_A italic_d italic_S/CFT correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999) 52–64, hep-th/9901021.
  25. J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N𝑁Nitalic_N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862, hep-th/9803002.
  26. D. E. Berenstein, R. Corrado, W. Fischler, and J. M. Maldacena, “The operator product expansion for Wilson loops and surfaces in the large N𝑁Nitalic_N limit,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 105023, hep-th/9809188.
  27. M. Mezei, S. S. Pufu, and Y. Wang, “Chern-Simons theory from M5-branes and calibrated M2-branes,” JHEP 08 (2019) 165, arXiv:1812.07572.
  28. N. Drukker and M. Trépanier, “M2-doughnuts,” JHEP 02 (2022) 071, arXiv:2111.09385.
  29. N. Drukker and M. Trépanier, “Ironing out the crease,” JHEP 08 (2022) 193, arXiv:2204.12627.
  30. N. Drukker and M. Trépanier, “BPS surface operators and calibrations,” J. Phys. A 56 no. 17, (2023) 175403, arXiv:2210.07251.
  31. K. Jensen, A. O’Bannon, B. Robinson, and R. Rodgers, “From the Weyl anomaly to entropy of two-dimensional boundaries and defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 24, (2019) 241602, arXiv:1812.08745.
  32. S. A. Gentle, M. Gutperle, and C. Marasinou, “Entanglement entropy of Wilson surfaces from bubbling geometries in M-theory,” JHEP 08 (2015) 019, arXiv:1506.00052.
  33. R. Rodgers, “Holographic entanglement entropy from probe M-theory branes,” JHEP 03 (2019) 092, arXiv:1811.12375.
  34. J. Estes, D. Krym, A. O’Bannon, B. Robinson, and R. Rodgers, “Wilson surface central charge from holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP 05 (2019) 032, arXiv:1812.00923.
  35. Y. Wang, “Surface defect, anomalies and b𝑏bitalic_b-extremization,” JHEP 11 (2021) 122, arXiv:2012.06574.
  36. M. Bullimore and H.-C. Kim, “The superconformal index of the (2,0) theory with defects,” JHEP 05 (2015) 048, arXiv:1412.3872.
  37. A. Chalabi, A. O’Bannon, B. Robinson, and J. Sisti, “Central charges of 2d superconformal defects,” JHEP 05 (2020) 095, arXiv:2003.02857.
  38. C. Meneghelli and M. Trépanier, “Bootstrapping string dynamics in the 6d 𝒩=(2,0)𝒩20\mathcal{N}=(2,0)caligraphic_N = ( 2 , 0 ) theories,” JHEP 07 (2023) 165, arXiv:2212.05020.
  39. L. Bianchi and M. Lemos, “Superconformal surfaces in four dimensions,” JHEP 06 (2020) 056, arXiv:1911.05082.
  40. N. Drukker, M. Probst, and M. Trépanier, “Defect CFT techniques in the 6d 𝒩=(2,0)𝒩20\mathcal{N}=(2,0)caligraphic_N = ( 2 , 0 ) theory,” JHEP 03 (2021) 261, arXiv:2009.10732.
  41. R. Corrado, B. Florea, and R. McNees, “Correlation functions of operators and Wilson surfaces in the d=6𝑑6d=6italic_d = 6, (0,2) theory in the large N𝑁Nitalic_N limit,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 085011, hep-th/9902153.
  42. N. Drukker, S. Giombi, A. A. Tseytlin, and X. Zhou, “Defect CFT in the 6d (2,0)20(2,0)( 2 , 0 ) theory from M2 brane dynamics in A⁢d⁢S7×S4𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆7superscript𝑆4AdS_{7}\times S^{4}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” JHEP 07 (2020) 101, arXiv:2004.04562.
  43. D. V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual,” Phys. Rept. 388 (2003) 279–360, hep-th/0306138.
  44. R. Camporesi, “Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces,” Phys. Rept. 196 (1990) 1–134.
  45. S. Giombi, A. Maloney, and X. Yin, “One-loop partition functions of 3D gravity,” JHEP 08 (2008) 007, arXiv:0804.1773.
  46. S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov, “One loop tests of higher spin AdS/CFT,” JHEP 12 (2013) 068, arXiv:1308.2337.
  47. V. Forini, A. A. Tseytlin, and E. Vescovi, “Perturbative computation of string one-loop corrections to Wilson loop minimal surfaces in A⁢d⁢S5×S5𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆5superscript𝑆5AdS_{5}\times S^{5}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” JHEP 03 (2017) 003, arXiv:1702.02164.
  48. C. Fefferman, “Conformal invariants,” “Elie Cartan et les mathématiques d’aujourd’hui,” Astérisque, hors série (1985) 95–116.
  49. E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and P. K. Townsend, “Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 75–78.
  50. N. Drukker, D. J. Gross, and H. Ooguri, “Wilson loops and minimal surfaces,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 125006, hep-th/9904191.
  51. H. Mori and S. Yamaguchi, “M5-branes and Wilson surfaces in A⁢d⁢S7𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆7AdS_{7}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT/CFT66{}_{6}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 6 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 2, (2014) 026005, 1404.0930.
  52. Princeton University Press, 1989. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1bpmb28.7.
  53. R. Camporesi, “The spinor heat kernel in maximally symmetric spaces,” Commun. Math. Phys. 148 (1992) 283–308.
  54. R. Camporesi and A. Higuchi, “On the eigen functions of the Dirac operator on spheres and real hyperbolic spaces,” J. Geom. Phys. 20 (1996) 1–18, gr-qc/9505009.
  55. J. R. David, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “The heat kernel on A⁢d⁢S3𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆3AdS_{3}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and its applications,” JHEP 04 (2010) 125, arXiv:0911.5085.
  56. R. Bergamin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Heat kernels on cone of A⁢d⁢S2𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆2AdS_{2}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and k𝑘kitalic_k-wound circular Wilson loop in A⁢d⁢S5×S5𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆5superscript𝑆5AdS_{5}\times S^{5}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT superstring,” J. Phys. A 49 no. 14, (2016) 14LT01, arXiv:1510.06894.
  57. Förste, Stefan, “Membrany corrections to the string anti-string potential in M5-brane theory,” JHEP 05 (1999) 002, hep-th/9902068.
  58. S. Giombi and A. A. Tseytlin, “Wilson loops at large N𝑁Nitalic_N and the quantum M2-brane,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 20, (2023) 201601, arXiv:2303.15207.
  59. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes,” JHEP 10 (2023) 029, arXiv:2307.14112.
  60. F. K. Seibold and A. A. Tseytlin, “S-matrix on effective string and compactified membrane,” J. Phys. A 56 no. 48, (2023) 485401, arXiv:2308.12189.
  61. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, “(2,0) theory on S5×S1superscript𝑆5superscript𝑆1S^{5}\times S^{1}italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and quantum M2 branes,” arXiv:2309.10786.
  62. N. Drukker and M. Trépanier, “Observations on BPS observables in 6d,” J. Phys. A 54 no. 20, (2021) 20, arXiv:2012.11087.
  63. J. Polchinski and J. Sully, “Wilson loop renormalization group flows,” JHEP 10 (2011) 059, arXiv:1104.5077.
  64. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. Tseytlin, “Non-supersymmetric Wilson loop in 𝒩=4𝒩4\mathcal{N}=4caligraphic_N = 4 SYM and defect 1d CFT,” JHEP 03 (2018) 131, arXiv:1712.06874.
  65. B. Chen, W. He, J.-B. Wu, and L. Zhang, “M5-branes and Wilson surfaces,” JHEP 08 (2007) 067, arXiv:0707.3978.
  66. A. Lewkowycz and E. Perlmutter, “Universality in the geometric dependence of Rényi entropy,” JHEP 01 (2015) 080, arXiv:1407.8171.
  67. N. Drukker, J. Gomis, and S. Matsuura, “Probing 𝒩=4𝒩4{\cal N}=4caligraphic_N = 4 SYM with surface operators,” JHEP 10 (2008) 048, arXiv:0805.4199.
  68. A. Chalabi, C. P. Herzog, A. O’Bannon, B. Robinson, and J. Sisti, “Weyl anomalies of four dimensional conformal boundaries and defects,” JHEP 02 (2022) 166, arXiv:2111.14713.
  69. P. Capuozzo, J. Estes, B. Robinson, and B. Suzzoni, “Holographic Weyl anomalies for 4d defects in 6d SCFTs,” arXiv:2310.17447.
  70. N. Drukker, D. J. Gross, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Green-Schwarz string in A⁢d⁢S5×S5𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆5superscript𝑆5AdS_{5}\times S^{5}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT: semiclassical partition function,” JHEP 04 (2000) 021, hep-th/0001204.
  71. V. Forini, V. G. M. Puletti, L. Griguolo, D. Seminara, and E. Vescovi, “Remarks on the geometrical properties of semiclassically quantized strings,” J. Phys. A 48 no. 47, (2015) 475401, arXiv:1507.01883.
  72. R. de León Ardón, “Semiclassical p𝑝pitalic_p-branes in hyperbolic space,” Class. Quant. Grav. 37 no. 23, (2020) 237001, arXiv:2007.03591.
  73. G. Goon, S. Melville, and J. Noller, “Quantum corrections to generic branes: DBI, NLSM, and more,” JHEP 01 (2021) 159, arXiv:2010.05913.
  74. B. de Wit, K. Peeters, and J. Plefka, “Superspace geometry for supermembrane backgrounds,” Nucl. Phys. B 532 (1998) 99–123, hep-th/9803209.
  75. B. de Wit, K. Peeters, J. Plefka, and A. Sevrin, “The M-theory two-brane in A⁢d⁢S4×S7𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆4superscript𝑆7AdS_{4}\times S^{7}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and A⁢d⁢S7×S4𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆7superscript𝑆4AdS_{7}\times S^{4}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” Phys. Lett. B 443 (1998) 153–158, hep-th/9808052.
  76. M. Sakaguchi, H. Shin, and K. Yoshida, “Semiclassical analysis of M2-brane in A⁢d⁢S4×S7/Zk𝐴𝑑subscript𝑆4superscript𝑆7subscript𝑍𝑘AdS_{4}\times S^{7}/Z_{k}italic_A italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,” JHEP 12 (2010) 012, arXiv:1007.3354.
Citations (8)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.