Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Cosmic-Ray Physics at the South Pole

Published 24 Nov 2023 in astro-ph.HE and physics.hist-ph | (2311.14474v2)

Abstract: The geographic South Pole provides unique opportunities to study cosmic particles in the Southern Hemisphere. It represents an optimal location to deploy large-scale neutrino telescopes in the deep Antarctic ice, such as AMANDA or IceCube. In both cases, the presence of an array, constructed to observe extensive air showers, enables hybrid measurements of cosmic rays. While additional neutron monitors can provide information on solar cosmic rays, large detector arrays, like SPASE or IceTop, allow for precise measurements of cosmic rays with energies above several 100 TeV100\,\rm{TeV}. In coincidence with the signals recorded in the deep ice, which are mostly due to the high-energy muons produced in air showers, this hybrid detector setup provides important information about the nature of cosmic rays. In this review, we will discuss the historical motivation and developments towards measurements of cosmic rays at the geographic South Pole and highlight recent results reported by the IceCube Collaboration. We will emphasize the important contributions by Thomas K. Gaisser and his colleagues that ultimately led to the rich Antarctic research program which today provides crucial insights into cosmic-ray physics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (90)
  1. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.90.934.
  2. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.768.
  3. doi:10.1139/p64-222.
  4. doi:10.7529/ICRC2011/V11/0622.
  5. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb46f.
  6. doi:10.1086/595679.
  7. doi:10.1086/184021.
  8. doi:10.1038/305784a0.
  9. doi:10.1098/rsta.1981.0144.
  10. doi:10.1038/329314a0.
  11. doi:10.1038/329807a0.
  12. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(89)90595-0.
  13. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/22/6/010.
  14. doi:10.1007/BF02724869.
  15. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/14/5/019.
  16. doi:10.1007/BF01341486.
  17. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(91)90025-L.
  18. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2292.
  19. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1425.
  20. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4504.
  21. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4495.
  22. doi:10.1038/353331a0.
  23. doi:10.1016/0920-5632(95)00482-O.
  24. doi:10.1126/science.267.5201.1147.
  25. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.012005.
  26. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00788-3.
  27. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00789-5.
  28. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2003.12.007.
  29. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2004.04.007.
  30. doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.15.3-A1.
  31. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201920808007.
  32. arXiv:1909.04423, doi:10.22323/1.358.0014.
  33. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012.
  34. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.10.067.
  35. doi:10.22323/1.358.0445.
  36. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.122001.
  37. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.02.010.
  38. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.082002.
  39. doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0319-7.
  40. doi:10.22323/1.301.0533.
  41. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/375/1/052026.
  42. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.042004.
  43. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.02.004.
  44. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.094003.
  45. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103018.
  46. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063002.
  47. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906.
  48. doi:10.22323/1.236.0337.
  49. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.014026.
  50. doi:10.1051/epjconf/20125202001.
  51. doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)80426-7.
  52. arXiv:hep-ph/0012252, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18211-2_166.
  53. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032010.
  54. doi:10.22323/1.444.0207.
  55. doi:10.22323/1.395.0357.
  56. arXiv:1408.1421, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.032003.
  57. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.192001.
  58. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921002004.
  59. doi:10.22323/1.395.0349.
  60. doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04054-5.
  61. doi:10.22323/1.444.0366.
  62. doi:10.22323/1.444.0357.
  63. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043005.
  64. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.01.006.
  65. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1701.04067.
  66. doi:10.22323/1.358.0894.
  67. doi:10.1007/BF02740917.
  68. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.012005.
  69. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102630.
  70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2024.102985.
  71. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11679-5.
  72. doi:10.22323/1.444.0993.
  73. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.01.004.
  74. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/l18.
  75. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf5cc.
  76. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/220.
  77. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/55.
  78. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.042005.
  79. doi:10.22323/1.395.0225.
  80. doi:10.22323/1.444.0342.
  81. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/T02002.
  82. doi:10.22323/1.395.0276.
  83. arXiv:2307.13969, doi:10.22323/1.444.0367.
  84. doi:10.22323/1.358.0418.
  85. doi:10.22323/1.395.0336.
  86. doi:10.22323/1.444.0326.
  87. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d67.
  88. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48.
  89. doi:10.22323/1.395.0407.
  90. doi:10.22323/1.444.0205.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.